OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for children with cerebral palsy. DATA SOURCES： We conducted electronic searches of PUBMED（1950/2017）, EMBASE（1974/2017）, Science Direct（198...OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for children with cerebral palsy. DATA SOURCES： We conducted electronic searches of PUBMED（1950/2017）, EMBASE（1974/2017）, Science Direct（1986/2017）, Academic Source Premier（1887/2017）, the Cochrane Library（Issue 4, April 2017）, Science Citation Index Expanded（1900/2017）, China National Knowledge Infrastructure（1915/2017）, China Biological Medicine（1990/2017-04）, Wan Fang（1980/2017）, VIP（1989/2017）, and Chinese Science Citation Database（1989/2017）. DATA SELECTION： We included randomized controlled trials that aimed to compare the effect of acupuncture plus rehabilitation training versus rehabilitation training alone. Data about functional motor abilities, daily activity/social participation, effective rate, intellectual development, and adverse effects were included. We used Revman 5.2 software for statistical analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES： The primary outcomes included functional motor abilities, daily activity, and effective rate. The secondary outcomes included intellectual development and adverse effects.RESULTS： Twenty-one studies with a total of 1718 participants met the inclusion criteria. The effect size of gross motor function（SMD = 0.64, 95% CI： 0.52 to 0.76, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 0%, P = 0.69; in 13 studies with 1144 patients） and the total effective rate（RR = 1.28, 95% CI： 1.20 to 1.37, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 18%, P = 0.27; in 12 studies with 1106 patients） suggested that acupuncture plus rehabilitation produced a significant improvement in gross motor function and a high total effective rate. The pooled fine motor function（SMD = 3.48, 95% CI： 2.62 to 4.34, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 64%, P = 0.10; in 2 studies with 193 patients）, modified Ashworth scale scores（SMD = –0.31, 95% CI： –0.52 to –0.11, P = 0.003; I^2 = 74%, P = 0.004; in 5 studies with 363 patients） and activities of daily living（SMD = 1.45, 95% CI： 1.20 to 1.71, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 78%, P = 0.00展开更多
基金financially supported by the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province of China,No.2016SZ0039,2016a grant from the Sichuan Province Medical Association in China,No.S15063,2015
文摘OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for children with cerebral palsy. DATA SOURCES： We conducted electronic searches of PUBMED（1950/2017）, EMBASE（1974/2017）, Science Direct（1986/2017）, Academic Source Premier（1887/2017）, the Cochrane Library（Issue 4, April 2017）, Science Citation Index Expanded（1900/2017）, China National Knowledge Infrastructure（1915/2017）, China Biological Medicine（1990/2017-04）, Wan Fang（1980/2017）, VIP（1989/2017）, and Chinese Science Citation Database（1989/2017）. DATA SELECTION： We included randomized controlled trials that aimed to compare the effect of acupuncture plus rehabilitation training versus rehabilitation training alone. Data about functional motor abilities, daily activity/social participation, effective rate, intellectual development, and adverse effects were included. We used Revman 5.2 software for statistical analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES： The primary outcomes included functional motor abilities, daily activity, and effective rate. The secondary outcomes included intellectual development and adverse effects.RESULTS： Twenty-one studies with a total of 1718 participants met the inclusion criteria. The effect size of gross motor function（SMD = 0.64, 95% CI： 0.52 to 0.76, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 0%, P = 0.69; in 13 studies with 1144 patients） and the total effective rate（RR = 1.28, 95% CI： 1.20 to 1.37, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 18%, P = 0.27; in 12 studies with 1106 patients） suggested that acupuncture plus rehabilitation produced a significant improvement in gross motor function and a high total effective rate. The pooled fine motor function（SMD = 3.48, 95% CI： 2.62 to 4.34, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 64%, P = 0.10; in 2 studies with 193 patients）, modified Ashworth scale scores（SMD = –0.31, 95% CI： –0.52 to –0.11, P = 0.003; I^2 = 74%, P = 0.004; in 5 studies with 363 patients） and activities of daily living（SMD = 1.45, 95% CI： 1.20 to 1.71, P 〈 0.00001; I^2 = 78%, P = 0.00
