Objective： To investigate the effects of Chang-ChuI-Eui-Ee-ln-Tang （苍术薏苡仁汤, CCEET）, modified CCEET （MCCEET）, and Semen Coicis （SC, a major component of CCEET） on energy and glucose homeostasis. The possib...Objective： To investigate the effects of Chang-ChuI-Eui-Ee-ln-Tang （苍术薏苡仁汤, CCEET）, modified CCEET （MCCEET）, and Semen Coicis （SC, a major component of CCEET） on energy and glucose homeostasis. The possible mechanism of action of CCEET was also determined. Methods： A total of 100 Sprague Dawley female rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups, with 20 in each group. Rats in 4 groups were fed with a high fat diet supplementation （2 g/kg body weight）, and water extracts of CCEET, MCCEET, SC, and cellulose （negative control）, respectively. The last group was fed with a low-fat diet as a positive control. Results： CCEET and MCCEET decreased body weight and body fat （mesenteric and retroperitoneal fat） more than SC. This decrease was due to decreased energy intake and increased energy expenditure and fat oxidation. The improvement in energy homeostasis was associated with the enhancement of the hypothalamic leptin signalling pathway involving potentiating the phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription-3, as well as attenuating the phosphorylation of 5＇ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase （AMPK）. Both CCEET and MCCEET improved glucose tolerance without changing serum insulin levels during an oral glucose tolerance test but MCCEET had a better effect than CCEET. Conclusions： Both CCEET and MCCEET safely exerted anti-obesity effects by enhancing energy balance in female rats with diet-induced obesity; MCCEET showed a better effect on glucose homeostasis.展开更多
基金Supported by the Korea Health 21 R&D Project,Ministry of Health and Welfare,Republic of Korea(HMP-08-A-0-80958)
文摘Objective： To investigate the effects of Chang-ChuI-Eui-Ee-ln-Tang （苍术薏苡仁汤, CCEET）, modified CCEET （MCCEET）, and Semen Coicis （SC, a major component of CCEET） on energy and glucose homeostasis. The possible mechanism of action of CCEET was also determined. Methods： A total of 100 Sprague Dawley female rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups, with 20 in each group. Rats in 4 groups were fed with a high fat diet supplementation （2 g/kg body weight）, and water extracts of CCEET, MCCEET, SC, and cellulose （negative control）, respectively. The last group was fed with a low-fat diet as a positive control. Results： CCEET and MCCEET decreased body weight and body fat （mesenteric and retroperitoneal fat） more than SC. This decrease was due to decreased energy intake and increased energy expenditure and fat oxidation. The improvement in energy homeostasis was associated with the enhancement of the hypothalamic leptin signalling pathway involving potentiating the phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription-3, as well as attenuating the phosphorylation of 5＇ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase （AMPK）. Both CCEET and MCCEET improved glucose tolerance without changing serum insulin levels during an oral glucose tolerance test but MCCEET had a better effect than CCEET. Conclusions： Both CCEET and MCCEET safely exerted anti-obesity effects by enhancing energy balance in female rats with diet-induced obesity; MCCEET showed a better effect on glucose homeostasis.
