Background： Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia （PKD） is the most common subtype of paroxysmal dyskinesias and is caused by mutations in PRRT2 gene. The majority of familial PKD was identified to harbor PRRT2 mutatio...Background： Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia （PKD） is the most common subtype of paroxysmal dyskinesias and is caused by mutations in PRRT2 gene. The majority of familial PKD was identified to harbor PRRT2 mutations. However, over two-third of sporadic PKD patients did not carry anyPRRT2 mutation, suggesting an existence of additional genetic mutations or possible misdiagnosis due to clinical overlap. Methods： A cohort of 28 Chinese patients clinically diagnosed with sporadic PKD and excluded PRRT2 mutations were recruited, Clinical features were evaluated, and all subjects were screened for MR-l, SLC2A1, and CLCN1 genes, which are the causative genes of paroxysmal nonkinesigenic dyskinesia （PNKD）, paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia, and myotonia congenita （MC）, respectively, In addition, 200 genetically matched healthy individuals were recruited as controls. Results： A total of 16 genetic variants including 4 in MR-1 gene, 8 in SLC2A1 gene, and 4 in CLCN1 gene were detected. Among them, SLC2A1 c.363G〉A mutation was detected in one case, and CLCN1 c. 1205C〉T mutation was detected in other two cases. Neither of them was found in 200 controls as well as 1000 Genomes database and ExAC database. Both mutations were predicted to be pathogenic by SIFT and PolyPhen2. The SLC2A 1 c.363G〉A mutation was novel. Conclusions： The phenotypic overlap may lead to the difficulty in distinguishing PKD from PNKD and MC. For those PRRT2-negative PKD cases, screening of SLC2A1 and CLCN1 genes are useful in confirming the diagnosis.展开更多
Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia（PKD） and myotonia congenita（MC） are independent disorders that share some clinical features. We aimed to investigate the sequences of PRRT2 and CLCN1 in a proband diagnosed with P...Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia（PKD） and myotonia congenita（MC） are independent disorders that share some clinical features. We aimed to investigate the sequences of PRRT2 and CLCN1 in a proband diagnosed with PKD and suspected MC. Clinical evaluation and auxiliary examinations were performed. Direct sequencing of the entire coding regions of the PRRT2 and CLCN1 genes was conducted. Haplotype analysis confirmed the relationships among the family members. The proband suffered choreoathetosis attacks triggered by sudden movements, and lower-limb weakness a n d s t i ff n e s s t h a t w o r s e n e d i n c o l d w e a t h e r. Carbamazepine monotherapy completely controlled his choreoathetosis and significantly relieved his limb weakness and stiffness. His father, when young, had similar limb stiffness, while his mother and brother were asymptomatic. Genetic analysis revealed that the proband and his father harbored a PRRT2 c.649 dup C mutation, and CLCN1 c.1723C〉T and c.2492A〉G mutations. His brother carried only the two CLCN1 mutations. None of these mutations were identified in his mother and 150 unrelated controls. This is the first report showing the coexistence ofPRRT2 and CLCN1 mutations. Our results also indicate that both the PRRT2 and CLCN1 genes need to be screened if we fail to identify PRRT2 mutations in PKD patients or CLCN1 mutations in MC patients.展开更多
基金Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Chinese Medical Journal website.This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China to Zhi-Ying Wu （No. 81330025 and No. 81125009）.
文摘Background： Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia （PKD） is the most common subtype of paroxysmal dyskinesias and is caused by mutations in PRRT2 gene. The majority of familial PKD was identified to harbor PRRT2 mutations. However, over two-third of sporadic PKD patients did not carry anyPRRT2 mutation, suggesting an existence of additional genetic mutations or possible misdiagnosis due to clinical overlap. Methods： A cohort of 28 Chinese patients clinically diagnosed with sporadic PKD and excluded PRRT2 mutations were recruited, Clinical features were evaluated, and all subjects were screened for MR-l, SLC2A1, and CLCN1 genes, which are the causative genes of paroxysmal nonkinesigenic dyskinesia （PNKD）, paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia, and myotonia congenita （MC）, respectively, In addition, 200 genetically matched healthy individuals were recruited as controls. Results： A total of 16 genetic variants including 4 in MR-1 gene, 8 in SLC2A1 gene, and 4 in CLCN1 gene were detected. Among them, SLC2A1 c.363G〉A mutation was detected in one case, and CLCN1 c. 1205C〉T mutation was detected in other two cases. Neither of them was found in 200 controls as well as 1000 Genomes database and ExAC database. Both mutations were predicted to be pathogenic by SIFT and PolyPhen2. The SLC2A 1 c.363G〉A mutation was novel. Conclusions： The phenotypic overlap may lead to the difficulty in distinguishing PKD from PNKD and MC. For those PRRT2-negative PKD cases, screening of SLC2A1 and CLCN1 genes are useful in confirming the diagnosis.
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81330025 and 81125009)
文摘Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia（PKD） and myotonia congenita（MC） are independent disorders that share some clinical features. We aimed to investigate the sequences of PRRT2 and CLCN1 in a proband diagnosed with PKD and suspected MC. Clinical evaluation and auxiliary examinations were performed. Direct sequencing of the entire coding regions of the PRRT2 and CLCN1 genes was conducted. Haplotype analysis confirmed the relationships among the family members. The proband suffered choreoathetosis attacks triggered by sudden movements, and lower-limb weakness a n d s t i ff n e s s t h a t w o r s e n e d i n c o l d w e a t h e r. Carbamazepine monotherapy completely controlled his choreoathetosis and significantly relieved his limb weakness and stiffness. His father, when young, had similar limb stiffness, while his mother and brother were asymptomatic. Genetic analysis revealed that the proband and his father harbored a PRRT2 c.649 dup C mutation, and CLCN1 c.1723C〉T and c.2492A〉G mutations. His brother carried only the two CLCN1 mutations. None of these mutations were identified in his mother and 150 unrelated controls. This is the first report showing the coexistence ofPRRT2 and CLCN1 mutations. Our results also indicate that both the PRRT2 and CLCN1 genes need to be screened if we fail to identify PRRT2 mutations in PKD patients or CLCN1 mutations in MC patients.
