幸福(Well-being)有快乐幸福(Hedonia)和心盛幸福(Eudaimonia)两种取向。心盛(Flourishing)是一种新兴的具有整体性、综合性和结构性的幸福评价指标,越来越受研究者关注。生命意义(Meaning in life)与幸福密切相关;它反映了人的存在价...幸福(Well-being)有快乐幸福(Hedonia)和心盛幸福(Eudaimonia)两种取向。心盛(Flourishing)是一种新兴的具有整体性、综合性和结构性的幸福评价指标,越来越受研究者关注。生命意义(Meaning in life)与幸福密切相关;它反映了人的存在价值和人生目标,具有动力作用,并体现于人的行动之中。生命意义包括意义拥有(Presence of Meaning)和意义追求(Search for Meaning)两个维度。意义拥有体现了意义与幸福的积极联系;而意义追求则反映了意义与幸福的消极联系,但这种消极联系具有短暂性和变化性。从心盛幸福(Eudaimonia)的视角来看,虽然负性经历和消极情绪会降低人当下的幸福感,但是人能在意义追求的过程中实现自我目标并体会到自我价值,从而获得内在而持久的幸福。展开更多
The study aims to examine the role of mastery and self-esteem as a potential mediator of the relationship of meaning in life and well-being among older Chinese stroke survivors. A cross-sectional study was conducted i...The study aims to examine the role of mastery and self-esteem as a potential mediator of the relationship of meaning in life and well-being among older Chinese stroke survivors. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 214 community-dwelling older stroke survivors (128 men and 86 women), ranging from 60 years to 88 years old. The meaning in life, mastery, self-esteem and subjective well-being were measured. The results indicated that: 1) The meaning in life and subjective well-being of stroke survivors were significantly positive correlated;2) Mastery and self-esteem played partial mediating roles between existential vacuum and subjective well-being;Self-esteem played full a mediating role between suffer acceptance and subjective well-being;Mastery played a full mediating role between life control and subjective well-being;Mastery played a partial mediating role between death acceptance and subjective well-being;Self-esteem also played a partial mediating role between mastery and subjective well-being.展开更多
In this article I argue how in the history of philosophy the meaning of the term“to be”was disputed over by two research programmes:the Platonic-Aristotelian one up to Heidegger and the Pythagorean-Parmenidean-Democ...In this article I argue how in the history of philosophy the meaning of the term“to be”was disputed over by two research programmes:the Platonic-Aristotelian one up to Heidegger and the Pythagorean-Parmenidean-Democritean one through Hobbes and Boole up to Peano.I call the first of“grammatical”type,the other of“linguistic algebraic”type.As in the grammatical classifications,in the former,formal or linguistic distinctions are mistaken for distinctions of logical type,or even of real or,as it is said,metaphysical type;hence its empty philosophical verbalism.In the latter,the term“to be”is taken in its merely linguistic meaning to build the science of reality,which should be known starting from rational principles,the“ideas”,as Democritus called them,through an adequate language.展开更多
文摘幸福(Well-being)有快乐幸福(Hedonia)和心盛幸福(Eudaimonia)两种取向。心盛(Flourishing)是一种新兴的具有整体性、综合性和结构性的幸福评价指标,越来越受研究者关注。生命意义(Meaning in life)与幸福密切相关;它反映了人的存在价值和人生目标,具有动力作用,并体现于人的行动之中。生命意义包括意义拥有(Presence of Meaning)和意义追求(Search for Meaning)两个维度。意义拥有体现了意义与幸福的积极联系;而意义追求则反映了意义与幸福的消极联系,但这种消极联系具有短暂性和变化性。从心盛幸福(Eudaimonia)的视角来看,虽然负性经历和消极情绪会降低人当下的幸福感,但是人能在意义追求的过程中实现自我目标并体会到自我价值,从而获得内在而持久的幸福。
文摘The study aims to examine the role of mastery and self-esteem as a potential mediator of the relationship of meaning in life and well-being among older Chinese stroke survivors. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 214 community-dwelling older stroke survivors (128 men and 86 women), ranging from 60 years to 88 years old. The meaning in life, mastery, self-esteem and subjective well-being were measured. The results indicated that: 1) The meaning in life and subjective well-being of stroke survivors were significantly positive correlated;2) Mastery and self-esteem played partial mediating roles between existential vacuum and subjective well-being;Self-esteem played full a mediating role between suffer acceptance and subjective well-being;Mastery played a full mediating role between life control and subjective well-being;Mastery played a partial mediating role between death acceptance and subjective well-being;Self-esteem also played a partial mediating role between mastery and subjective well-being.
文摘In this article I argue how in the history of philosophy the meaning of the term“to be”was disputed over by two research programmes:the Platonic-Aristotelian one up to Heidegger and the Pythagorean-Parmenidean-Democritean one through Hobbes and Boole up to Peano.I call the first of“grammatical”type,the other of“linguistic algebraic”type.As in the grammatical classifications,in the former,formal or linguistic distinctions are mistaken for distinctions of logical type,or even of real or,as it is said,metaphysical type;hence its empty philosophical verbalism.In the latter,the term“to be”is taken in its merely linguistic meaning to build the science of reality,which should be known starting from rational principles,the“ideas”,as Democritus called them,through an adequate language.
