本文以评价理论为视角,运用批评话语分析的方法,探究中美媒体在关于新冠肺炎疫情的新闻报道中所呈现出的态度。研究发现,整体而言,中美新闻报道中“判断”和“鉴赏”均占有较高的比例,但中美新闻报道的态度资源分布仍存在差异。在判断...本文以评价理论为视角,运用批评话语分析的方法,探究中美媒体在关于新冠肺炎疫情的新闻报道中所呈现出的态度。研究发现,整体而言,中美新闻报道中“判断”和“鉴赏”均占有较高的比例,但中美新闻报道的态度资源分布仍存在差异。在判断资源中,China Daily侧重于使用“坚忍不拔”和“能力”,而Los Angeles Times侧重于使用“能力”和“行为规范”;在鉴赏资源中,China Daily和Los Angeles Times均侧重于使用“价值”。China Daily中的正面态度资源明显多于Los Angeles Times。展开更多
Presidential victory speeches are intentionally employed to achieve certain communicative goals.Based on Appraisal Theory,this paper attempts to reveal evaluation features and to explore realizations and functions of ...Presidential victory speeches are intentionally employed to achieve certain communicative goals.Based on Appraisal Theory,this paper attempts to reveal evaluation features and to explore realizations and functions of prosodies in Trump’s victory speech.The research results prove that an appreciation of the functioning of discourse prosodies can better facilitate our understanding of the stances of writers or speakers.The present study contributes to specifying features of appraisal resources in presidential victory speeches and sheds light on the function of discourse prosodies.展开更多
文摘本文以评价理论为视角,运用批评话语分析的方法,探究中美媒体在关于新冠肺炎疫情的新闻报道中所呈现出的态度。研究发现,整体而言,中美新闻报道中“判断”和“鉴赏”均占有较高的比例,但中美新闻报道的态度资源分布仍存在差异。在判断资源中,China Daily侧重于使用“坚忍不拔”和“能力”,而Los Angeles Times侧重于使用“能力”和“行为规范”;在鉴赏资源中,China Daily和Los Angeles Times均侧重于使用“价值”。China Daily中的正面态度资源明显多于Los Angeles Times。
文摘Presidential victory speeches are intentionally employed to achieve certain communicative goals.Based on Appraisal Theory,this paper attempts to reveal evaluation features and to explore realizations and functions of prosodies in Trump’s victory speech.The research results prove that an appreciation of the functioning of discourse prosodies can better facilitate our understanding of the stances of writers or speakers.The present study contributes to specifying features of appraisal resources in presidential victory speeches and sheds light on the function of discourse prosodies.