AIM： To determine factors related to disease severity, mortality and morbidity in acute pancreatitis.METHODS： One hundred and ninety-nine consecutive patients were admitted with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis ...AIM： To determine factors related to disease severity, mortality and morbidity in acute pancreatitis.METHODS： One hundred and ninety-nine consecutive patients were admitted with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis （AP） in a 5-year period （1998-2002）. In a prospective design, demographic data, etiology, mean hospital admission time, clinical, radiological, biochemical findings, treatment modalities, mortality and morbidity were recorded. Endocrine insufficiency was investigated with oral glucose tolerance test. The relations between these parameters, scoring systems （Ranson, Imrie and APACHE Ⅱ） and patients＇ outcome were determined by using invariable tests and the receiver operating characteristics curve.RESULTS： One hundred patients were men and 99 were women; the mean age was 55 years. Biliary pancreatitis was the most common form, followed by idiopathic pancreatitis （53% and 26%, respectively）. Sixty-three patients had severe pancreatitis and 136 had mild disease. Respiratory rate 〉 20/min, pulse rate 〉 90min, increased C-reactive protein （CRP）, lactate dehydrogenase （LDH） and aspartate aminotransferase （AST） levels, organ necrosis 〉 30% on computed tornography （CT） and leukocytosis were associated with severe disease. The rate of glucose intolerance, morbidity and mortality were 24.1%, 24.8% and 13.6%, respectively. CRP 〉 142 mg/L, BUN 〉 22 mg/dL, LDH 〉 667 U/L, base excess 〉 -5, CT severity index 〉 3 and APACHE score 〉 8 were related to morbidity and mortality.CONCLUSION： APACHE Ⅱ score, LDH, base excess and CT severity index have prognostic value and CRP is a reliable marker for predicting both mortality and morbidity.展开更多
AIM： Acute pancreatitis （AP） is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE Ⅱ） syst...AIM： Acute pancreatitis （AP） is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE Ⅱ） systems and Balthazar computed tomography severity index （CTSI）. The purpose of this review study was to assess the accuracy of CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE II score in course and outcome prediction of AP. METHODS： We reviewed 121 patients who underwent helical CT within 48 h after onset of symptoms of a first episode of AP between 1999 and 2003. Fourteen inappropriate subjects were excluded; we reviewed the 107 contrastenhanced CT images to calculate the CTSI. We also reviewed their Ranson and APACHE Ⅱ score. In addition, complications, duration of hospitalization, mortality rate, and other pathology history also were our comparison parameters. RESULTS： We classified 85 patients （79%） as having mild AP （CTSI 〈5） and 22 patients （21%） as having severe AP （CTSI ≥5）. In mild group, the mean APACHE II score and Ranson score was 8.6±1.9 and 2.4±1.2, and those of severe group was 10.2±2.1 and 3.1±0.8, respectively. The most common complication was pseudocyst and abscess and it presented in 21 （20%） patients and their CTSI was 5.9±1.4. A CTSI ≥5 significantly correlated with death, complication present, and prolonged length of stay. Patients with a CTSI ≥5 were 15 times to die than those CTSI 〈5, and the prolonged length of stay and complications present were 17 times and 8 times than that in CTSI 〈5, respectively. CONCLUSION： CTSI is a useful tool in assessing the severity and outcome of AP and the CTSI ≥5 is an index in our study. Although Ranson score and APACHE II score also are choices to be the predictors for complications, mortality and the length of stay of AP, the sensitivity of them are lower than CTSI.展开更多
目的探讨动态监测序贯器官衰竭估计(SOFA)评分在危重病患者预后评估中的应用价值。方法选取本院重症科2010年5月—2011年9月收治的危重病患者84例为研究对象,4周内存活60例(存活组),死亡24例(死亡组)。分别于患者入ICU后第1、3、5、7天...目的探讨动态监测序贯器官衰竭估计(SOFA)评分在危重病患者预后评估中的应用价值。方法选取本院重症科2010年5月—2011年9月收治的危重病患者84例为研究对象,4周内存活60例(存活组),死亡24例(死亡组)。分别于患者入ICU后第1、3、5、7天进行急性生理学和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)和SOFA评分,比较两组不同时间APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分,分析器官损伤数与病死率及最大SOFA评分的关系及两组受损器官数和最大SOFA评分的差异。采用SPSS 13.0统计软件进行数据处理,计量资料采用t检验和方差分析,计数资料采用χ2检验。结果存活组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分与死亡组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.00)。存活组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d APACHEⅡ评分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=14.76,P=0.00);其中入住ICU内3、5、7 d与1 d时比较,差异均有统计学意义(q值分别为5.95、7.84和8.39,P=0.00)。死亡组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d APACHEⅡ评分比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.15,P=0.93)。存活组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d SOFA评分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=18.27,P=0.00);其中入住ICU内3、5、7 d与1 d时比较,差异均有统计学意义(q值分别为5.04、8.06和9.74,P=0.00)。死亡组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d SOFA评分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=5.35,P=0.00);其中入住ICU内5、7 d与1 d时比较,差异均有统计学意义(q值分别为2.98和5.03,P=0.00)。以受损器官3个为界,分为受损器官≥3个组和受损器官<3个组。受损器官≥3个组65例,死亡24例,病死率为36.92%;受损器官<3个组19例,无死亡患者,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.82,P=0.00)。受损器官≥3个组存活患者最大SOFA评分为(7.73±2.23)分,死亡患者最大SOFA评分为(12.70±2.82)分,差异有统计学意义(t=-7.85,P=0.00);受损器官<3个组患者最大SOFA评分为(4.63±1.30)分。存活组和死亡组患者平均器官损伤数比较,差异有展开更多
文摘AIM： To determine factors related to disease severity, mortality and morbidity in acute pancreatitis.METHODS： One hundred and ninety-nine consecutive patients were admitted with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis （AP） in a 5-year period （1998-2002）. In a prospective design, demographic data, etiology, mean hospital admission time, clinical, radiological, biochemical findings, treatment modalities, mortality and morbidity were recorded. Endocrine insufficiency was investigated with oral glucose tolerance test. The relations between these parameters, scoring systems （Ranson, Imrie and APACHE Ⅱ） and patients＇ outcome were determined by using invariable tests and the receiver operating characteristics curve.RESULTS： One hundred patients were men and 99 were women; the mean age was 55 years. Biliary pancreatitis was the most common form, followed by idiopathic pancreatitis （53% and 26%, respectively）. Sixty-three patients had severe pancreatitis and 136 had mild disease. Respiratory rate 〉 20/min, pulse rate 〉 90min, increased C-reactive protein （CRP）, lactate dehydrogenase （LDH） and aspartate aminotransferase （AST） levels, organ necrosis 〉 30% on computed tornography （CT） and leukocytosis were associated with severe disease. The rate of glucose intolerance, morbidity and mortality were 24.1%, 24.8% and 13.6%, respectively. CRP 〉 142 mg/L, BUN 〉 22 mg/dL, LDH 〉 667 U/L, base excess 〉 -5, CT severity index 〉 3 and APACHE score 〉 8 were related to morbidity and mortality.CONCLUSION： APACHE Ⅱ score, LDH, base excess and CT severity index have prognostic value and CRP is a reliable marker for predicting both mortality and morbidity.
文摘AIM： Acute pancreatitis （AP） is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE Ⅱ） systems and Balthazar computed tomography severity index （CTSI）. The purpose of this review study was to assess the accuracy of CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE II score in course and outcome prediction of AP. METHODS： We reviewed 121 patients who underwent helical CT within 48 h after onset of symptoms of a first episode of AP between 1999 and 2003. Fourteen inappropriate subjects were excluded; we reviewed the 107 contrastenhanced CT images to calculate the CTSI. We also reviewed their Ranson and APACHE Ⅱ score. In addition, complications, duration of hospitalization, mortality rate, and other pathology history also were our comparison parameters. RESULTS： We classified 85 patients （79%） as having mild AP （CTSI 〈5） and 22 patients （21%） as having severe AP （CTSI ≥5）. In mild group, the mean APACHE II score and Ranson score was 8.6±1.9 and 2.4±1.2, and those of severe group was 10.2±2.1 and 3.1±0.8, respectively. The most common complication was pseudocyst and abscess and it presented in 21 （20%） patients and their CTSI was 5.9±1.4. A CTSI ≥5 significantly correlated with death, complication present, and prolonged length of stay. Patients with a CTSI ≥5 were 15 times to die than those CTSI 〈5, and the prolonged length of stay and complications present were 17 times and 8 times than that in CTSI 〈5, respectively. CONCLUSION： CTSI is a useful tool in assessing the severity and outcome of AP and the CTSI ≥5 is an index in our study. Although Ranson score and APACHE II score also are choices to be the predictors for complications, mortality and the length of stay of AP, the sensitivity of them are lower than CTSI.
文摘目的探讨动态监测序贯器官衰竭估计(SOFA)评分在危重病患者预后评估中的应用价值。方法选取本院重症科2010年5月—2011年9月收治的危重病患者84例为研究对象,4周内存活60例(存活组),死亡24例(死亡组)。分别于患者入ICU后第1、3、5、7天进行急性生理学和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)和SOFA评分,比较两组不同时间APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分,分析器官损伤数与病死率及最大SOFA评分的关系及两组受损器官数和最大SOFA评分的差异。采用SPSS 13.0统计软件进行数据处理,计量资料采用t检验和方差分析,计数资料采用χ2检验。结果存活组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d APACHEⅡ和SOFA评分与死亡组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.00)。存活组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d APACHEⅡ评分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=14.76,P=0.00);其中入住ICU内3、5、7 d与1 d时比较,差异均有统计学意义(q值分别为5.95、7.84和8.39,P=0.00)。死亡组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d APACHEⅡ评分比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.15,P=0.93)。存活组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d SOFA评分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=18.27,P=0.00);其中入住ICU内3、5、7 d与1 d时比较,差异均有统计学意义(q值分别为5.04、8.06和9.74,P=0.00)。死亡组患者入住ICU内1、3、5、7 d SOFA评分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=5.35,P=0.00);其中入住ICU内5、7 d与1 d时比较,差异均有统计学意义(q值分别为2.98和5.03,P=0.00)。以受损器官3个为界,分为受损器官≥3个组和受损器官<3个组。受损器官≥3个组65例,死亡24例,病死率为36.92%;受损器官<3个组19例,无死亡患者,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.82,P=0.00)。受损器官≥3个组存活患者最大SOFA评分为(7.73±2.23)分,死亡患者最大SOFA评分为(12.70±2.82)分,差异有统计学意义(t=-7.85,P=0.00);受损器官<3个组患者最大SOFA评分为(4.63±1.30)分。存活组和死亡组患者平均器官损伤数比较,差异有
