目的观察老年反杓型血压节律者中,日间血压控制是否达标的影响因素、用药选择以及对心脏重构的影响。方法连续入选2016年1月至2019年1月在我院老年内科住院的年龄≥65岁的高血压患者,通过24小时动态血压监测(24 h ABPM)筛选出反杓型血...目的观察老年反杓型血压节律者中,日间血压控制是否达标的影响因素、用药选择以及对心脏重构的影响。方法连续入选2016年1月至2019年1月在我院老年内科住院的年龄≥65岁的高血压患者,通过24小时动态血压监测(24 h ABPM)筛选出反杓型血压节律患者共300例,根据日间手测血压结果是否达标分为达标组148例和未达标组152例。比较2组患者的特征及药物使用的差异,通过超声心动图方法比较血压控制是否达标对心脏结构和功能的影响。结果2组日间手测血压比较,未达标组收缩压更高,而舒张压差异无统计学意义;ABPM结果显示,2组间除舒张压外,不同时段的平均收缩压和平均脉压之间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。2组患者中,年龄、性别、冠心病、外周血管疾病、肾功能不全共患病率、血脂水平之间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);糖尿病共患病率、体重指数(BMI)、氮末端脑钠肽(NT-pro-BNP)水平在血压未达标组中明显高于达标组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。药物治疗方面,绝大多数患者(272例,90.67%)为联合用药,钙离子拮抗剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ACEI/ARB)以及α受体拮抗剂的应用比例差异均无统计学意义,而噻嗪类利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂的应用,在日间血压达标组较未达标组明显增多。应用超声心动图评估心脏结构功能,2组患者的左心室射血分数(LVEF)之间差异无统计学意义;室间隔厚度、左心室重量指数(left ventricular mass index,LVMI)、左心房内径、E/e’值在血压未达标组均高于达标组(均P<0.05)。结论在老年反杓型节律高血压患者中,噻嗪类利尿剂及β受体阻滞剂的应用更有利于血压降至目标值。血压控制未达标患者的NT-pro-BNP水平升高,且室间隔厚度、LVMI、左心房内径和E/e’值均明显升高,显示即使同为反杓型血压节律患者中,血压控制未达展开更多
Introduction: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM) is a non- invasive examination recommended for subjects at high cardiovascular risk, and those requiring a nocturnal drop in BP such as elderly and obese...Introduction: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM) is a non- invasive examination recommended for subjects at high cardiovascular risk, and those requiring a nocturnal drop in BP such as elderly and obese subjects, those with secondary hypertension or resistant, diabetics, subjects with metabolic syndrome or sleep apnea syndrome. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of ABPM in the diagnosis and evaluation of the level of control of hypertension under treatment at the Bel Air international clinic. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study, carried out at the Bel Air International Clinic in Conakry (Guinea) between January 2019 and November 30, 2022. It included a consecutive series of 180 consenting patients recruited through an ambulatory measurement of 24-hour blood pressure from a FUGADA brand device. Results: We collected 180 patients, with a male predominance (sex-ratio M/F = 2.46). The mean age of the patients was 48.48 ± 14.23 years. The most represented age group was that of 32 to 42 years with 50 cases (27.8%) followed by that of 43 to 52 years with 42 cases or 23.3%. The indication was for diagnostic purposes in 106 cases 58.9%, the therapeutic evaluation in 58 patients (32.2%). The examination was prescribed by a cardiologist in 98 cases (54.4%), a general practitioner in 71 cases (39.4%), a neurologist in 11 cases (6.1%). In the therapeutic evaluation, high blood pressure was controlled in 24 patients (13.3%) and uncontrolled in 34 cases (18.9%). In the diagnostic indication, high blood pressure was confirmed in 79 cases (43.9%) with a statistically significant link (Chi2</sup> = 4.57 and p-value = 0.032). The nycthemeral mean was 187.27 ± 26.22 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 110.37 ± 19.06 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), during the day, 151.64 ± 21.45 mmHg for SBP and 71.59 ± 8.67 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. During the study 65 patients (36.1%) were identified as dippers and 115 patients (6展开更多
文摘目的观察老年反杓型血压节律者中,日间血压控制是否达标的影响因素、用药选择以及对心脏重构的影响。方法连续入选2016年1月至2019年1月在我院老年内科住院的年龄≥65岁的高血压患者,通过24小时动态血压监测(24 h ABPM)筛选出反杓型血压节律患者共300例,根据日间手测血压结果是否达标分为达标组148例和未达标组152例。比较2组患者的特征及药物使用的差异,通过超声心动图方法比较血压控制是否达标对心脏结构和功能的影响。结果2组日间手测血压比较,未达标组收缩压更高,而舒张压差异无统计学意义;ABPM结果显示,2组间除舒张压外,不同时段的平均收缩压和平均脉压之间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。2组患者中,年龄、性别、冠心病、外周血管疾病、肾功能不全共患病率、血脂水平之间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);糖尿病共患病率、体重指数(BMI)、氮末端脑钠肽(NT-pro-BNP)水平在血压未达标组中明显高于达标组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。药物治疗方面,绝大多数患者(272例,90.67%)为联合用药,钙离子拮抗剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ACEI/ARB)以及α受体拮抗剂的应用比例差异均无统计学意义,而噻嗪类利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂的应用,在日间血压达标组较未达标组明显增多。应用超声心动图评估心脏结构功能,2组患者的左心室射血分数(LVEF)之间差异无统计学意义;室间隔厚度、左心室重量指数(left ventricular mass index,LVMI)、左心房内径、E/e’值在血压未达标组均高于达标组(均P<0.05)。结论在老年反杓型节律高血压患者中,噻嗪类利尿剂及β受体阻滞剂的应用更有利于血压降至目标值。血压控制未达标患者的NT-pro-BNP水平升高,且室间隔厚度、LVMI、左心房内径和E/e’值均明显升高,显示即使同为反杓型血压节律患者中,血压控制未达
文摘Introduction: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM) is a non- invasive examination recommended for subjects at high cardiovascular risk, and those requiring a nocturnal drop in BP such as elderly and obese subjects, those with secondary hypertension or resistant, diabetics, subjects with metabolic syndrome or sleep apnea syndrome. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of ABPM in the diagnosis and evaluation of the level of control of hypertension under treatment at the Bel Air international clinic. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study, carried out at the Bel Air International Clinic in Conakry (Guinea) between January 2019 and November 30, 2022. It included a consecutive series of 180 consenting patients recruited through an ambulatory measurement of 24-hour blood pressure from a FUGADA brand device. Results: We collected 180 patients, with a male predominance (sex-ratio M/F = 2.46). The mean age of the patients was 48.48 ± 14.23 years. The most represented age group was that of 32 to 42 years with 50 cases (27.8%) followed by that of 43 to 52 years with 42 cases or 23.3%. The indication was for diagnostic purposes in 106 cases 58.9%, the therapeutic evaluation in 58 patients (32.2%). The examination was prescribed by a cardiologist in 98 cases (54.4%), a general practitioner in 71 cases (39.4%), a neurologist in 11 cases (6.1%). In the therapeutic evaluation, high blood pressure was controlled in 24 patients (13.3%) and uncontrolled in 34 cases (18.9%). In the diagnostic indication, high blood pressure was confirmed in 79 cases (43.9%) with a statistically significant link (Chi2</sup> = 4.57 and p-value = 0.032). The nycthemeral mean was 187.27 ± 26.22 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 110.37 ± 19.06 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), during the day, 151.64 ± 21.45 mmHg for SBP and 71.59 ± 8.67 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. During the study 65 patients (36.1%) were identified as dippers and 115 patients (6
