以输送稠油的90°弯管为研究对象,对稠油流经弯管进行流场和应力的分析。利用Anton Paar MCR302可视化流变仪测得了稠油的粘温曲线,并借助Fluent与Ansys软件对弯管进行热流固耦合模拟计算。对稠油样品在不同温度及流速下流经管道弯...以输送稠油的90°弯管为研究对象,对稠油流经弯管进行流场和应力的分析。利用Anton Paar MCR302可视化流变仪测得了稠油的粘温曲线,并借助Fluent与Ansys软件对弯管进行热流固耦合模拟计算。对稠油样品在不同温度及流速下流经管道弯头进行了流场和应力的研究和分析。研究结论可为进一步研究稠油流经弯管的冲蚀机理提供理论依据。展开更多
While finite volume methodologies (FVM) have predominated in fluid flow computations, many flow problems, including groundwater models, would benefit from the use of boundary methods, such as the Complex Variable Boun...While finite volume methodologies (FVM) have predominated in fluid flow computations, many flow problems, including groundwater models, would benefit from the use of boundary methods, such as the Complex Variable Boundary Element Method (CVBEM). However, to date, there has been no reporting of a comparison of computational results between the FVM and the CVBEM in the assessment of flow field characteristics. In this work, the CVBEM is used to develop a flow field vector outcome of ideal fluid flow in a 90-degree bend which is then compared to the computational results from a finite volume model of the same situation. The focus of the modelling comparison in the current work is flow field trajectory vectors of the fluid flow, with respect to vector magnitude and direction. Such a comparison is necessary to validate the development of flow field vectors from the CVBEM and is of interest to many engineering flow problems, specifically groundwater modelling. Comparison of the CVBEM and FVM flow field trajectory vectors for the target problem of ideal flow in a 90-degree bend shows good agreement between the considered methodologies.展开更多
文摘以输送稠油的90°弯管为研究对象,对稠油流经弯管进行流场和应力的分析。利用Anton Paar MCR302可视化流变仪测得了稠油的粘温曲线,并借助Fluent与Ansys软件对弯管进行热流固耦合模拟计算。对稠油样品在不同温度及流速下流经管道弯头进行了流场和应力的研究和分析。研究结论可为进一步研究稠油流经弯管的冲蚀机理提供理论依据。
文摘While finite volume methodologies (FVM) have predominated in fluid flow computations, many flow problems, including groundwater models, would benefit from the use of boundary methods, such as the Complex Variable Boundary Element Method (CVBEM). However, to date, there has been no reporting of a comparison of computational results between the FVM and the CVBEM in the assessment of flow field characteristics. In this work, the CVBEM is used to develop a flow field vector outcome of ideal fluid flow in a 90-degree bend which is then compared to the computational results from a finite volume model of the same situation. The focus of the modelling comparison in the current work is flow field trajectory vectors of the fluid flow, with respect to vector magnitude and direction. Such a comparison is necessary to validate the development of flow field vectors from the CVBEM and is of interest to many engineering flow problems, specifically groundwater modelling. Comparison of the CVBEM and FVM flow field trajectory vectors for the target problem of ideal flow in a 90-degree bend shows good agreement between the considered methodologies.
