Since modern time, Western philosophy has been attached to natural sciences as its “cultural matrix”. However, it does not catch up with the change from the mechanistic paradigm of the evolutionary paradigm of Darwi...Since modern time, Western philosophy has been attached to natural sciences as its “cultural matrix”. However, it does not catch up with the change from the mechanistic paradigm of the evolutionary paradigm of Darwin. The contemporary philosophy has confused the mechanisticand determinist model of sciences in the early modern time with scientism. Under the circumstances of anti-scientism, the specific and thematic studies of man in philosophy have undergone a crisis. The paper justifies the Darwinian paradigm in terms of empirical confirmation, convergence and divergence. Achievements of sociology and new archeology have provided problems and materials for philosophical treatment. The new synthesis by philosophy on studies of man is crucial not only for the outlet of philosophy itself, but also for an insight into the Chinese culture in terms of co-evolution genes and culture.展开更多
文摘Since modern time, Western philosophy has been attached to natural sciences as its “cultural matrix”. However, it does not catch up with the change from the mechanistic paradigm of the evolutionary paradigm of Darwin. The contemporary philosophy has confused the mechanisticand determinist model of sciences in the early modern time with scientism. Under the circumstances of anti-scientism, the specific and thematic studies of man in philosophy have undergone a crisis. The paper justifies the Darwinian paradigm in terms of empirical confirmation, convergence and divergence. Achievements of sociology and new archeology have provided problems and materials for philosophical treatment. The new synthesis by philosophy on studies of man is crucial not only for the outlet of philosophy itself, but also for an insight into the Chinese culture in terms of co-evolution genes and culture.
