数据是电子商务发展的生命线,但是数据要素的发展也带来了数据泄露、数据垄断、不正当使用数据等问题,尤其是如何在电子商务数据保护和电子商务数据流通之间取得平衡的问题。本文旨在借鉴“日本限定提供数据”条款的有利经验,为我国构...数据是电子商务发展的生命线,但是数据要素的发展也带来了数据泄露、数据垄断、不正当使用数据等问题,尤其是如何在电子商务数据保护和电子商务数据流通之间取得平衡的问题。本文旨在借鉴“日本限定提供数据”条款的有利经验,为我国构建一个既有利于保护数据提供者的积极性,又促进数据流通的机制框架提供建议。鉴于此,本文首先明确电子商务数据保护立法的两种路径选择,随后分析“限定提供数据”这一条款以及该条的法定构成要件。同时,法律和现实之间存在差异,日本公布“限定提供数据”条款之后,其弊端初见端倪。最后结合我国电子商务数据保护的现状,以完善电子商务数据保护的法律法规体系为目标给出几点启示。Data is the lifeline of the development of e-commerce, but the development of data elements has also brought about problems such as data leakage, data monopoly, and improper use of data, especially how to strike a balance between e-commerce data protection and e-commerce data circulation. This article aims to draw on the favorable experience of the “Japanese limited data provision” clause, and provide suggestions for China to build a mechanism framework that is both conducive to protecting the enthusiasm of data providers and promoting data circulation. In view of this, this article first clarifies two paths for legislation on e-commerce data protection, and then analyzes the clause of “limiting the provision of data” and its statutory constituent elements. At the same time, there are differences between law and reality, and the drawbacks of Japan’s “limited data provision” clause have begun to emerge. Finally, based on the current situation of e-commerce data protection in China, several insights are provided with the goal of improving the legal and regulatory system for e-commerce data protection.展开更多
文摘数据是电子商务发展的生命线,但是数据要素的发展也带来了数据泄露、数据垄断、不正当使用数据等问题,尤其是如何在电子商务数据保护和电子商务数据流通之间取得平衡的问题。本文旨在借鉴“日本限定提供数据”条款的有利经验,为我国构建一个既有利于保护数据提供者的积极性,又促进数据流通的机制框架提供建议。鉴于此,本文首先明确电子商务数据保护立法的两种路径选择,随后分析“限定提供数据”这一条款以及该条的法定构成要件。同时,法律和现实之间存在差异,日本公布“限定提供数据”条款之后,其弊端初见端倪。最后结合我国电子商务数据保护的现状,以完善电子商务数据保护的法律法规体系为目标给出几点启示。Data is the lifeline of the development of e-commerce, but the development of data elements has also brought about problems such as data leakage, data monopoly, and improper use of data, especially how to strike a balance between e-commerce data protection and e-commerce data circulation. This article aims to draw on the favorable experience of the “Japanese limited data provision” clause, and provide suggestions for China to build a mechanism framework that is both conducive to protecting the enthusiasm of data providers and promoting data circulation. In view of this, this article first clarifies two paths for legislation on e-commerce data protection, and then analyzes the clause of “limiting the provision of data” and its statutory constituent elements. At the same time, there are differences between law and reality, and the drawbacks of Japan’s “limited data provision” clause have begun to emerge. Finally, based on the current situation of e-commerce data protection in China, several insights are provided with the goal of improving the legal and regulatory system for e-commerce data protection.
