分析规范化康复治疗臂丛神经损伤的临床疗效。方法:将我科室治疗的臂丛神经损伤患者 86例为研究对象,按照治疗方法划分为两组,即观察组和对照组,每组各43例。对照组患者进行常规康复治疗,观察组患者进行规范化康复治疗。结果:观察组患...分析规范化康复治疗臂丛神经损伤的临床疗效。方法:将我科室治疗的臂丛神经损伤患者 86例为研究对象,按照治疗方法划分为两组,即观察组和对照组,每组各43例。对照组患者进行常规康复治疗,观察组患者进行规范化康复治疗。结果:观察组患者的治疗总有效率为 97.67%,对照组为 79.07%,(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗 4周和治疗 8周后的 VAS 评分,与对照组相比,均明显更低,(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗的臂丛神经功能评分,与对照组相比,均明显更高,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对臂丛神经损伤患者开展规范化康复治疗,能够显著提高患者的临床疗效,且在缓解患者疼痛程度,改善患者臂丛神经功能中具有表现出了显著的促进作用。Abstract:Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy of standardized rehabilitation for brachial plexus injury. Methods: A total of 86 patients with brachial plexus injury who were treated in our department were selected as the research objects. According to the treatment method, they were divided into two groups, namely the observation group and the control group, with 43 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment, and patients in the observation group received standardized rehabilitation treatment. Results: The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.67% and that in the control group was 79.07%, (P<0.05). The VAS scores of patients in the observation group after treatment for 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment were both comparable to those of the control group. Significantly lower, (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the brachial plexus function scores of the patients in the observation group were significantly Higher, the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Standardized rehabilitation treatment for patients with brachial plexus injury can significantly improve the cli展开更多
文摘分析规范化康复治疗臂丛神经损伤的临床疗效。方法:将我科室治疗的臂丛神经损伤患者 86例为研究对象,按照治疗方法划分为两组,即观察组和对照组,每组各43例。对照组患者进行常规康复治疗,观察组患者进行规范化康复治疗。结果:观察组患者的治疗总有效率为 97.67%,对照组为 79.07%,(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗 4周和治疗 8周后的 VAS 评分,与对照组相比,均明显更低,(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗的臂丛神经功能评分,与对照组相比,均明显更高,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对臂丛神经损伤患者开展规范化康复治疗,能够显著提高患者的临床疗效,且在缓解患者疼痛程度,改善患者臂丛神经功能中具有表现出了显著的促进作用。Abstract:Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy of standardized rehabilitation for brachial plexus injury. Methods: A total of 86 patients with brachial plexus injury who were treated in our department were selected as the research objects. According to the treatment method, they were divided into two groups, namely the observation group and the control group, with 43 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment, and patients in the observation group received standardized rehabilitation treatment. Results: The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.67% and that in the control group was 79.07%, (P<0.05). The VAS scores of patients in the observation group after treatment for 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment were both comparable to those of the control group. Significantly lower, (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the brachial plexus function scores of the patients in the observation group were significantly Higher, the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Standardized rehabilitation treatment for patients with brachial plexus injury can significantly improve the cli
