Objective： To search for the best procedure on preparation ofacellular bovine pericardium,so to provide scaffolds for constructing tissue-engineering Methods： The bovine pericardiums were treated with 5 methods, whi...Objective： To search for the best procedure on preparation ofacellular bovine pericardium,so to provide scaffolds for constructing tissue-engineering Methods： The bovine pericardiums were treated with 5 methods, which were divided into 6 groupsGroup A： Fresh bovinepericardium; Group B： Trypsin-detergent group;Group C： Freeze-thaw-detergent 24 h group; Group I）： Freeze-thaw-detergent 48 h group; Group Fz Freeze-thaw-nuclease group; Group F： Detergent-nuclease group. Then, by HE staining and scanning electron microscope to observe the effects ofdecellularization and fibrous changes among the 6 groups; by water content testingonechanical testing to observe the changes in physical properties of the matrix; by detecting the DNA content of each group to determine the effect of deeellularization qualitatively; by eytotoxieity test to detect the biocompatibility of bovine pericardium in each group. Results： The 5 methods can all remove the cellular components effectively, compared with the fresh bovine pericardium,the water content of each deeellularized group were increased （P〈0.05）, while the DNA content decreased （P〈0.05）, with statistically significant differences. Of group E, the fibers were a little disorder, with the largest tension and the elastic modulus increased, while the rupture tensile rate decreased. Compared with fresh bovine pericardium,the largest tension of the other decellularization groups were all decreased （P〈0.05）. The fibers of group B, group D were irregularly arranged and also with ruptures, both the elastic modulus and the rupture tensile rate decreased（P〈0.05）. In group C and F, the fibers were dense and their direction was normal, the elastic modulus and the rupture tensile rate were similar to the fresh bovine pericardium （P〉0.05）. Cytotoxicity results showed that the cell toxicity of group B, group C, group D, group E and group F were respectively 0.9, 0.6, 1.0, 1.0 and 0.5, each group were qualified toxicity test, in which group C and group 展开更多
文摘Objective： To search for the best procedure on preparation ofacellular bovine pericardium,so to provide scaffolds for constructing tissue-engineering Methods： The bovine pericardiums were treated with 5 methods, which were divided into 6 groupsGroup A： Fresh bovinepericardium; Group B： Trypsin-detergent group;Group C： Freeze-thaw-detergent 24 h group; Group I）： Freeze-thaw-detergent 48 h group; Group Fz Freeze-thaw-nuclease group; Group F： Detergent-nuclease group. Then, by HE staining and scanning electron microscope to observe the effects ofdecellularization and fibrous changes among the 6 groups; by water content testingonechanical testing to observe the changes in physical properties of the matrix; by detecting the DNA content of each group to determine the effect of deeellularization qualitatively; by eytotoxieity test to detect the biocompatibility of bovine pericardium in each group. Results： The 5 methods can all remove the cellular components effectively, compared with the fresh bovine pericardium,the water content of each deeellularized group were increased （P〈0.05）, while the DNA content decreased （P〈0.05）, with statistically significant differences. Of group E, the fibers were a little disorder, with the largest tension and the elastic modulus increased, while the rupture tensile rate decreased. Compared with fresh bovine pericardium,the largest tension of the other decellularization groups were all decreased （P〈0.05）. The fibers of group B, group D were irregularly arranged and also with ruptures, both the elastic modulus and the rupture tensile rate decreased（P〈0.05）. In group C and F, the fibers were dense and their direction was normal, the elastic modulus and the rupture tensile rate were similar to the fresh bovine pericardium （P〉0.05）. Cytotoxicity results showed that the cell toxicity of group B, group C, group D, group E and group F were respectively 0.9, 0.6, 1.0, 1.0 and 0.5, each group were qualified toxicity test, in which group C and group
