In Wittgenstein’s later philosophical works "Philosophical Investigations",there are a number of discussions on intentionality.By reading them I guessed that these argumentations had a pertinence,seemed to ...In Wittgenstein’s later philosophical works "Philosophical Investigations",there are a number of discussions on intentionality.By reading them I guessed that these argumentations had a pertinence,seemed to aim at the viewpoints of phenomenological philosophers,such as Franz Brentano and Edmund Husserl.Recently the publication of The Voices of Wittgenstein:The Vienna Circle,Ludwig Wittgenstein and Friedrich Waismann has given some proofs to my conjecture.This paper tries to clarify how Wittgenstein argued again the idea that intentional acts,such as the concepts of "desire","believe","intend","understand" are cognized by immanent perception.According to Wittgenstein,only combined with social practices,are these so-called intentional acts able to be grasped.If Wittgenstein’s argumentation is tenable,then Brentano’s and Husserl’s position about intentionality must be wrong.展开更多
文摘In Wittgenstein’s later philosophical works "Philosophical Investigations",there are a number of discussions on intentionality.By reading them I guessed that these argumentations had a pertinence,seemed to aim at the viewpoints of phenomenological philosophers,such as Franz Brentano and Edmund Husserl.Recently the publication of The Voices of Wittgenstein:The Vienna Circle,Ludwig Wittgenstein and Friedrich Waismann has given some proofs to my conjecture.This paper tries to clarify how Wittgenstein argued again the idea that intentional acts,such as the concepts of "desire","believe","intend","understand" are cognized by immanent perception.According to Wittgenstein,only combined with social practices,are these so-called intentional acts able to be grasped.If Wittgenstein’s argumentation is tenable,then Brentano’s and Husserl’s position about intentionality must be wrong.
