China's proposal to build a 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road is aimed at exploring the unique values and concepts of the ancient road, enriching it with new meaning for the present era and actively developing econ...China's proposal to build a 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road is aimed at exploring the unique values and concepts of the ancient road, enriching it with new meaning for the present era and actively developing economic partnerships with countries situated along the route. Specifically, the partnerships the proposal seeks to further integrate current cooperation in order to achieve positive effects.展开更多
This trend was apparent in the late 1920s but has long failed to attract the attention of historians. The author explores the point at which the old and new schools of historical research diverged, the ways in which t...This trend was apparent in the late 1920s but has long failed to attract the attention of historians. The author explores the point at which the old and new schools of historical research diverged, the ways in which this trend was related to the contemporary skeptical approach to Chinas early history, and to the socalled “double evidence,” a method that emphasized the combination of literary and archaeological data in historical studies. The scholars of the new school adopted a heretical, antitradition stance in their efforts to join the international intellectual community, and were interested in the topics studied by Western sinologists. These factors were responsible for their paradoxical attitude toward historical data: They liked to see more but hated to read literary sources.展开更多
文摘China's proposal to build a 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road is aimed at exploring the unique values and concepts of the ancient road, enriching it with new meaning for the present era and actively developing economic partnerships with countries situated along the route. Specifically, the partnerships the proposal seeks to further integrate current cooperation in order to achieve positive effects.
文摘This trend was apparent in the late 1920s but has long failed to attract the attention of historians. The author explores the point at which the old and new schools of historical research diverged, the ways in which this trend was related to the contemporary skeptical approach to Chinas early history, and to the socalled “double evidence,” a method that emphasized the combination of literary and archaeological data in historical studies. The scholars of the new school adopted a heretical, antitradition stance in their efforts to join the international intellectual community, and were interested in the topics studied by Western sinologists. These factors were responsible for their paradoxical attitude toward historical data: They liked to see more but hated to read literary sources.