Two principles are claimed in this paper,namely,the lest harm principle and the best compatibility principle,and argued to improve democracy in voting system and public sphere.It is said that a new voting system in wh...Two principles are claimed in this paper,namely,the lest harm principle and the best compatibility principle,and argued to improve democracy in voting system and public sphere.It is said that a new voting system in which one person with two votes(for and against)could be better than the one vote system in reducing the success of a lest loved dangerous candidate,so that it will be a justified reflection of the two sides of one’s preference.It is also argued that the principle of majority is not a right thing in public sphere.An opinion is justified to be the more reasonable only because of its compatibility to the universal reason and the proved virtues rather than the often misled majority of people.展开更多
文摘Two principles are claimed in this paper,namely,the lest harm principle and the best compatibility principle,and argued to improve democracy in voting system and public sphere.It is said that a new voting system in which one person with two votes(for and against)could be better than the one vote system in reducing the success of a lest loved dangerous candidate,so that it will be a justified reflection of the two sides of one’s preference.It is also argued that the principle of majority is not a right thing in public sphere.An opinion is justified to be the more reasonable only because of its compatibility to the universal reason and the proved virtues rather than the often misled majority of people.
