BACKGROUND:Pancreatoduodenectomy offers the only chance of cure for patients with periampullary cancers.This,however,is a major undertaking in most patients and is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality...BACKGROUND:Pancreatoduodenectomy offers the only chance of cure for patients with periampullary cancers.This,however,is a major undertaking in most patients and is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality.A multidisciplinary approach to the workup and follow-up of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy was initiated at our institution to improve the diagnosis,resection rate,mortality and morbidity.We undertook the study to assess the effect of this approach on diagnosis,resection rates and short-term outcomes such as morbidity and mortality.METHODS:A prospective database of patients presenting with periampullary cancers to a single surgeon between April 2004 and April 2010 was reviewed.All cases were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting comprising surgeons,gastroenterologists,radiologists,oncologists,radiation oncologists,pathologists and nursing staff.A standardized investigation and management algorithm was followed.Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.RESULTS:A total of 295 patients with a periampullary lesion were discussed and 178 underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (resection rate 60%).Sixty-one patients (34%) required either a vascular or an additional organ resection.Eighty-nine patients experienced complications,of which the commonest was blood transfusion (12%).Thirty-four patients (19%) had major complications,i.e.grade 3 or above.There was no in-hospital,30-day or 60-day mortality.CONCLUSIONS:Pancreatoduodenectomy can safely be performed in high-volume centers with very low mortality.The surgeon’s role should be careful patient selection,intensive preoperative investigations,use of a team approach,and an unbiased discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting to optimize the outcome in these patients.展开更多
Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer with vascular involvement remains a surgical challenge because high perioperative risk an...Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer with vascular involvement remains a surgical challenge because high perioperative risk and the uncertainty of a survival benefit. Whilst portal vein resection has started to gather momentum because the perioperative morbidity and long term survival is comparable to standard pancreatectomy, there isn't yet a consensus on arterial resections. There have been various reports and case series of arterial resections in pancreatic cancer, with mixed survival results. Mollberg et al have appraised the heterogeneous published literature available on arterial resection in pancreatic cancer in an attempt to compare this to standard pancreatectomy. In this article, we discuss the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, and the limitations associated with analysing results from heterogenous data. We have outlined the important features in surgery for pancreatic cancer and specifically to arterial resections, and compared arterial resections to the published literature on venous resections.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate long-term survival after the Whipple operation with superior mesenteric vein/portal vein resection(SMV/PVR)in relation to resection length.METHODS:We evaluated 118 patients who underwent the Whipple op...AIM:To evaluate long-term survival after the Whipple operation with superior mesenteric vein/portal vein resection(SMV/PVR)in relation to resection length.METHODS:We evaluated 118 patients who underwent the Whipple operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma at our Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery between 2005 and 2010.Fifty-eight of these patients were diagnosed with microscopic PV/SMV invasion by frozen-section examination and underwent SMV/PVR.In 28 patients,the length of SMV/PVR was≤3 cm.In the other 30 patients,the length of SMV/PVR was>3cm.Clinical and survival data were analyzed.RESULTS:SMV/PVR was performed successfully in 58patients.There was a significant difference between the two groups(SMV/PVR≤3 cm and SMV/PVR>3 cm)in terms of the mean survival time(18 mo vs 11 mo)and the overall 1-and 3-year survival rates(67.9%and14.3%vs 41.3%and 5.7%,P<0.02).However,there was no significant difference in age(64 years vs 58years,P=0.06),operative time(435 min vs 477 min,P=0.063),blood loss(300 mL vs 383 mL,P=0.071)and transfusion volume(85.7 mL vs 166.7 mL,P=0.084)between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Patients who underwent the Whipple operation with SMV/PVR≤3 cm had better long-term survival than those with>3 cm resection.展开更多
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death and is one of the most aggressive malignant tumors with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 4%.Surgical resection remains the...Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death and is one of the most aggressive malignant tumors with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 4%.Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment but is only possible for 15%-20% of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.About 40% of patients have locally advanced nonresectable disease.In the past,determination of pancreatic cancer resectability was made at surgical exploration.The development of modern imaging techniques has allowed preoperative staging of patients.Institutions disagree about the criteria used to classify patients.Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancers plays a very important role in determining treatment and prognosis.There is no evidence-based consensus on the optimal preoperative imaging assessment of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer and a unified definition ofborderline resectable pancreatic cancer is also lacking.Thus,there is much room for improvement in all aspects of treatment for pancreatic cancer.Multi-detector computed tomography has been widely accepted as the imaging technique of choice for diagnosing and staging pancreatic cancer.With improved surgical techniques and advanced perioperative management,vascular resection and reconstruction are performed more frequently;patients thought once to be unresectable are undergoing radical surgery.However,when attempting heroic surgery,a realistic approach concerning the patient's age and health status,probability of recovery after surgery,perioperative morbidity and mortality and life quality after tumor resection is necessary.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) is a disease with dismal prognosis, and the only possibility of cure, albeit small, is based on the combination of complete resection with negative histopathological margins...BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) is a disease with dismal prognosis, and the only possibility of cure, albeit small, is based on the combination of complete resection with negative histopathological margins (R0 resection) with adjuvant treatment. Therefore, a lot of effort has been made during the last decade to assess the role of extensive surgery in both local recurrence and survival of patients with PCa. DATA SOURCES: Medline search and manual cross- referencing were utilized to identify published evidence- based data for PCa surgery between 1973 and 2006, with emphasis to feasibility, efficacy, long-term survival, disease free survival, recurrence rates, pain relief and quality of life. RESULTS: Extended surgery is safe and feasible in high volume surgical centers with comparable short-term results. Organ preserving surgery is a main goal because of quality of life reasons and is performed whenever possible from the tumor extent. Concerning long-term survival major vein resection does not adversely affect outcome. To date, there are no changes in long-term survival attributed to the extended lymph node dissection. However, there is a benefit in locoregional control with fewer local recurrences and extended lymphadenectomy allows better staging for the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Extended PCa surgery is safe and feasible despite the inconclusive results in patient’s survival benefit. In the future, appropriately powered randomized trials of standard vs. extended resections may show improved outcomes for PCa patients.展开更多
Background:Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer may require extended resections in order to achieve tumor-free margins,especially in the case of up-front resections,but it is important to know the limits of surgica...Background:Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer may require extended resections in order to achieve tumor-free margins,especially in the case of up-front resections,but it is important to know the limits of surgical therapy in this disease.This study aimed to investigate the impact of extent of pancreatic and venous resection on short-and long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma(PDAC).Methods:This was a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database of pancreatic resections for PDAC.Short-and long-term outcomes were analyzed in patients having borderline resectable PDAC submitted to up-front total pancreatectomy(TP)or pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)with simultaneous portal vein(PV)and/or superior mesenteric vein(SMV)resection.Venous resections were carried out as tangential venous resection(TVR)or segmental venous resection(SVR).Patients were divided into 4 groups:(1)PD+TVR,(2)PD+SVR,(3)TP+TVR,(4)TP+SVR.Uni-and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with survival.Results:Ninety-nine patients were submitted to simultaneous pancreatic and venous resection for PDAC.Among them,25 were submitted to PD+TVR(25.3%),12 to PD+SVR(12.1%),23 to TP+TVR(23.2%),and 39 to TP+SVR(39.4%).Overall,major morbidity(Clavien-Dindo grade≥IIIA)was 26.3%.Thirty-and 90-day mortality were 3%and 11.1%,respectively.There were no significant differences among groups in terms of short-term outcomes.Median overall survival of patients submitted to PD+TVR was significantly higher than those to TP+SVR(29.5 vs 7.9 months,P=0.001).Multivariate analysis identified TP(HR=2.11;95%CI:1.31–3.44;P=0.002)and SVR(HR=2.01;95%CI:1.27–3.15;P=0.003)as the only independent prognostic factors for overall survival.Conclusions:Up-front TP associated to SVR was predictive of worse survival in borderline resectable PDAC.Perioperative treatments in high-risk surgical groups may improve such poor outcomes.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND:Pancreatoduodenectomy offers the only chance of cure for patients with periampullary cancers.This,however,is a major undertaking in most patients and is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality.A multidisciplinary approach to the workup and follow-up of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy was initiated at our institution to improve the diagnosis,resection rate,mortality and morbidity.We undertook the study to assess the effect of this approach on diagnosis,resection rates and short-term outcomes such as morbidity and mortality.METHODS:A prospective database of patients presenting with periampullary cancers to a single surgeon between April 2004 and April 2010 was reviewed.All cases were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting comprising surgeons,gastroenterologists,radiologists,oncologists,radiation oncologists,pathologists and nursing staff.A standardized investigation and management algorithm was followed.Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.RESULTS:A total of 295 patients with a periampullary lesion were discussed and 178 underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (resection rate 60%).Sixty-one patients (34%) required either a vascular or an additional organ resection.Eighty-nine patients experienced complications,of which the commonest was blood transfusion (12%).Thirty-four patients (19%) had major complications,i.e.grade 3 or above.There was no in-hospital,30-day or 60-day mortality.CONCLUSIONS:Pancreatoduodenectomy can safely be performed in high-volume centers with very low mortality.The surgeon’s role should be careful patient selection,intensive preoperative investigations,use of a team approach,and an unbiased discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting to optimize the outcome in these patients.
文摘Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer with vascular involvement remains a surgical challenge because high perioperative risk and the uncertainty of a survival benefit. Whilst portal vein resection has started to gather momentum because the perioperative morbidity and long term survival is comparable to standard pancreatectomy, there isn't yet a consensus on arterial resections. There have been various reports and case series of arterial resections in pancreatic cancer, with mixed survival results. Mollberg et al have appraised the heterogeneous published literature available on arterial resection in pancreatic cancer in an attempt to compare this to standard pancreatectomy. In this article, we discuss the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, and the limitations associated with analysing results from heterogenous data. We have outlined the important features in surgery for pancreatic cancer and specifically to arterial resections, and compared arterial resections to the published literature on venous resections.
文摘AIM:To evaluate long-term survival after the Whipple operation with superior mesenteric vein/portal vein resection(SMV/PVR)in relation to resection length.METHODS:We evaluated 118 patients who underwent the Whipple operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma at our Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery between 2005 and 2010.Fifty-eight of these patients were diagnosed with microscopic PV/SMV invasion by frozen-section examination and underwent SMV/PVR.In 28 patients,the length of SMV/PVR was≤3 cm.In the other 30 patients,the length of SMV/PVR was>3cm.Clinical and survival data were analyzed.RESULTS:SMV/PVR was performed successfully in 58patients.There was a significant difference between the two groups(SMV/PVR≤3 cm and SMV/PVR>3 cm)in terms of the mean survival time(18 mo vs 11 mo)and the overall 1-and 3-year survival rates(67.9%and14.3%vs 41.3%and 5.7%,P<0.02).However,there was no significant difference in age(64 years vs 58years,P=0.06),operative time(435 min vs 477 min,P=0.063),blood loss(300 mL vs 383 mL,P=0.071)and transfusion volume(85.7 mL vs 166.7 mL,P=0.084)between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Patients who underwent the Whipple operation with SMV/PVR≤3 cm had better long-term survival than those with>3 cm resection.
文摘Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death and is one of the most aggressive malignant tumors with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 4%.Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment but is only possible for 15%-20% of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.About 40% of patients have locally advanced nonresectable disease.In the past,determination of pancreatic cancer resectability was made at surgical exploration.The development of modern imaging techniques has allowed preoperative staging of patients.Institutions disagree about the criteria used to classify patients.Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancers plays a very important role in determining treatment and prognosis.There is no evidence-based consensus on the optimal preoperative imaging assessment of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer and a unified definition ofborderline resectable pancreatic cancer is also lacking.Thus,there is much room for improvement in all aspects of treatment for pancreatic cancer.Multi-detector computed tomography has been widely accepted as the imaging technique of choice for diagnosing and staging pancreatic cancer.With improved surgical techniques and advanced perioperative management,vascular resection and reconstruction are performed more frequently;patients thought once to be unresectable are undergoing radical surgery.However,when attempting heroic surgery,a realistic approach concerning the patient's age and health status,probability of recovery after surgery,perioperative morbidity and mortality and life quality after tumor resection is necessary.
文摘BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) is a disease with dismal prognosis, and the only possibility of cure, albeit small, is based on the combination of complete resection with negative histopathological margins (R0 resection) with adjuvant treatment. Therefore, a lot of effort has been made during the last decade to assess the role of extensive surgery in both local recurrence and survival of patients with PCa. DATA SOURCES: Medline search and manual cross- referencing were utilized to identify published evidence- based data for PCa surgery between 1973 and 2006, with emphasis to feasibility, efficacy, long-term survival, disease free survival, recurrence rates, pain relief and quality of life. RESULTS: Extended surgery is safe and feasible in high volume surgical centers with comparable short-term results. Organ preserving surgery is a main goal because of quality of life reasons and is performed whenever possible from the tumor extent. Concerning long-term survival major vein resection does not adversely affect outcome. To date, there are no changes in long-term survival attributed to the extended lymph node dissection. However, there is a benefit in locoregional control with fewer local recurrences and extended lymphadenectomy allows better staging for the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Extended PCa surgery is safe and feasible despite the inconclusive results in patient’s survival benefit. In the future, appropriately powered randomized trials of standard vs. extended resections may show improved outcomes for PCa patients.
文摘Background:Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer may require extended resections in order to achieve tumor-free margins,especially in the case of up-front resections,but it is important to know the limits of surgical therapy in this disease.This study aimed to investigate the impact of extent of pancreatic and venous resection on short-and long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma(PDAC).Methods:This was a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database of pancreatic resections for PDAC.Short-and long-term outcomes were analyzed in patients having borderline resectable PDAC submitted to up-front total pancreatectomy(TP)or pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)with simultaneous portal vein(PV)and/or superior mesenteric vein(SMV)resection.Venous resections were carried out as tangential venous resection(TVR)or segmental venous resection(SVR).Patients were divided into 4 groups:(1)PD+TVR,(2)PD+SVR,(3)TP+TVR,(4)TP+SVR.Uni-and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with survival.Results:Ninety-nine patients were submitted to simultaneous pancreatic and venous resection for PDAC.Among them,25 were submitted to PD+TVR(25.3%),12 to PD+SVR(12.1%),23 to TP+TVR(23.2%),and 39 to TP+SVR(39.4%).Overall,major morbidity(Clavien-Dindo grade≥IIIA)was 26.3%.Thirty-and 90-day mortality were 3%and 11.1%,respectively.There were no significant differences among groups in terms of short-term outcomes.Median overall survival of patients submitted to PD+TVR was significantly higher than those to TP+SVR(29.5 vs 7.9 months,P=0.001).Multivariate analysis identified TP(HR=2.11;95%CI:1.31–3.44;P=0.002)and SVR(HR=2.01;95%CI:1.27–3.15;P=0.003)as the only independent prognostic factors for overall survival.Conclusions:Up-front TP associated to SVR was predictive of worse survival in borderline resectable PDAC.Perioperative treatments in high-risk surgical groups may improve such poor outcomes.
