Background: Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on l...Background: Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large(> 10 cm) stage A-B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX(mFOLFOX) regimen and those ofTACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC.Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen(oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m^2 intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin,400 mg/m^2 intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m^2 continuous infusion)every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression(TTP), and safety were assessed.Results: A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group(52.6% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001;83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months(hazard radio[HR] = 2.35,95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection(10 vs. 3,P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3-4 adverse events(AE) and serious adverse events(SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group(grade 3-4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007;SAEs: 6 vs. 15,p = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent(10 vs. 2,P = 0.026).Conclusions: HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly bette展开更多
AIM:To identify prognostic factors from pretreatment variables of the initial transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)procedure in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). METHODS:One thousand and five hundred and six...AIM:To identify prognostic factors from pretreatment variables of the initial transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)procedure in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). METHODS:One thousand and five hundred and sixtynine patients with unresectable HCC underwent TACE as initial treatment were retrospectively studied.Pretreatment variables of the initial TACE procedure with a P value less than 0.05 by univariate analysis were subjected to Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS:The median overall survival time and 1-, 5-,10-year survival rates were 10.37 mo,47%,10%, and 7%,respectively.A Cox proportional hazard model showed that 8 pretreatment factors of regional lymphnodes metastasis,Child-Pugh class,macrovascular invasion,greatest dimension,α-fetoprotein(AFP), Hepatitis virus B,tumor capsule,and nodules were independent prognostic factors.Patients with multimodality therapy have better survival than those with TACE treatment only. CONCLUSION:Tumor status,hepatic function reserve,AFP,and hepatitis virus B status were independent prognostic factors for unresectable HCC.Distant metastasis might not be a contraindication to TACE. Multimodality therapy might improve survival.展开更多
The natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)with portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT)is dismal(approximately 2-4 mo),and PVTT is reportedly found in 10%-40%of HCC patients at diagnosis.According to the Barcelona...The natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)with portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT)is dismal(approximately 2-4 mo),and PVTT is reportedly found in 10%-40%of HCC patients at diagnosis.According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC)Staging System(which is the most widely adopted HCC management guideline),sorafenib is the standard of care for advanced HCC(i.e.,BCLC stage C)and the presence of PVTT is included in this category.However,sorafenib treatment only marginally prolongs patient survival and,notably,its therapeutic efficacy is reduced in patients with PVTT.In this context,there have been diverse efforts to develop alternatives to current standard systemic chemotherapies or combination treatment options.To date,many studies on transarterial chemoembolization,3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy,hepatic arterial chemotherapy,and transarterial radioembolization report better overall survival than sorafenib therapy alone,but their outcomes need to be verified in future prospective,randomized controlled studies in order to be incorporated into current treatment guidelines.Additionally,combination strategies have been applied to treat HCC patients with PVTT,with the hope that the possible synergistic actions among different treatment modalities would provide promising results.This narrative review describes the current status of the management options for HCC with PVTT,with a focus on overall survival.展开更多
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignant tumors worldwide:Portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT)occurs in about 35%-50%of patients and represents a strong negative prognostic factor,due to the increa...Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignant tumors worldwide:Portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT)occurs in about 35%-50%of patients and represents a strong negative prognostic factor,due to the increased risk of tumor spread into the bloodstream,leading to a high recurrence risk.For this reason,it is a contraindication to liver transplantation and in several prognostic scores sorafenib represents its standard of care,due to its antiangiogenetic action,although it can grant only a poor prolongation of life expectancy.Recent scientific evidences lead to consider PVTT as a complex anatomical and clinical condition,including a wide range of patients with different prognosis and new treatment possibilities according to the degree of portal system involvement,tumor biological aggressiveness,complications caused by portal hypertension,patient’s clinical features and tolerance to antineoplastic treatments.The median survival has been reported to range between 2.7 and 4 mo in absence of therapy,but it can vary from 5 mo to 5 years,thus depicting an extremely variable scenario.For this reason,it is extremely important to focus on the most adequate strategy to be applied to each group of PVTT patients.展开更多
Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the current standard of care for patients with large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), preserved liver function, absence of cancer-related symptoms and no evidence...Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the current standard of care for patients with large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), preserved liver function, absence of cancer-related symptoms and no evidence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread(i.e., those classified as intermediate stage according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system). The rationale for TACE is that the intra-arterial injection of a chemotherapeutic drug such as doxorubicin or cisplatin followed by embolization of the blood vessel will result in a strong cytotoxic effect enhanced by ischemia. However, TACE is a very heterogeneous operative technique and varies in terms of chemotherapeutic agents, treatment devices and schedule. In order to overcome the major drawbacks of conventional TACE(c TACE), non-resorbable drug-eluting beads(DEBs) loaded with cytotoxic drugs have been developed. DEBs are able to slowly release the drug upon injection and increase the intensity and duration of ischemia while enhancing the drug delivery to the tumor. Unfortunately, despite the theoretical advantages of this new device and the promising results of the pivotal studies, definitive data in favor of its superiority over c TACE are still lacking. The recommendation for TACE as the standard-of-care for intermediate-stage HCC is based on the demonstration of improved survival compared with best supportive care or suboptimal therapies in a meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials, but other therapeutic options(namely, surgery and radioembolization) proved competitive in selected subsets of intermediate HCC patients. Other potential fields of application of TACE in hepato-oncology are the pre-transplant setting(as downstaging/bridging treatment) and the early stage(in patients unsuitable to curative therapy). The potential of TACE in selectedadvanced patients with segmental portal vein thrombosis and preserved liver function deserves further reports.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81625017 and No.81572385)the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China(No.16ykjc36)
文摘Background: Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large(> 10 cm) stage A-B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX(mFOLFOX) regimen and those ofTACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC.Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen(oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m^2 intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin,400 mg/m^2 intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m^2 continuous infusion)every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression(TTP), and safety were assessed.Results: A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group(52.6% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001;83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months(hazard radio[HR] = 2.35,95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection(10 vs. 3,P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3-4 adverse events(AE) and serious adverse events(SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group(grade 3-4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007;SAEs: 6 vs. 15,p = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent(10 vs. 2,P = 0.026).Conclusions: HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly bette
基金Supported by The Eleventh Five-Year Key Plan of the China National Science and Technique Foundation,No.2006BAI02A04the 5010 Foundation of Sun Yat-sen University,No.2007043
文摘AIM:To identify prognostic factors from pretreatment variables of the initial transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)procedure in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). METHODS:One thousand and five hundred and sixtynine patients with unresectable HCC underwent TACE as initial treatment were retrospectively studied.Pretreatment variables of the initial TACE procedure with a P value less than 0.05 by univariate analysis were subjected to Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS:The median overall survival time and 1-, 5-,10-year survival rates were 10.37 mo,47%,10%, and 7%,respectively.A Cox proportional hazard model showed that 8 pretreatment factors of regional lymphnodes metastasis,Child-Pugh class,macrovascular invasion,greatest dimension,α-fetoprotein(AFP), Hepatitis virus B,tumor capsule,and nodules were independent prognostic factors.Patients with multimodality therapy have better survival than those with TACE treatment only. CONCLUSION:Tumor status,hepatic function reserve,AFP,and hepatitis virus B status were independent prognostic factors for unresectable HCC.Distant metastasis might not be a contraindication to TACE. Multimodality therapy might improve survival.
文摘The natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)with portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT)is dismal(approximately 2-4 mo),and PVTT is reportedly found in 10%-40%of HCC patients at diagnosis.According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC)Staging System(which is the most widely adopted HCC management guideline),sorafenib is the standard of care for advanced HCC(i.e.,BCLC stage C)and the presence of PVTT is included in this category.However,sorafenib treatment only marginally prolongs patient survival and,notably,its therapeutic efficacy is reduced in patients with PVTT.In this context,there have been diverse efforts to develop alternatives to current standard systemic chemotherapies or combination treatment options.To date,many studies on transarterial chemoembolization,3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy,hepatic arterial chemotherapy,and transarterial radioembolization report better overall survival than sorafenib therapy alone,but their outcomes need to be verified in future prospective,randomized controlled studies in order to be incorporated into current treatment guidelines.Additionally,combination strategies have been applied to treat HCC patients with PVTT,with the hope that the possible synergistic actions among different treatment modalities would provide promising results.This narrative review describes the current status of the management options for HCC with PVTT,with a focus on overall survival.
文摘Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignant tumors worldwide:Portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT)occurs in about 35%-50%of patients and represents a strong negative prognostic factor,due to the increased risk of tumor spread into the bloodstream,leading to a high recurrence risk.For this reason,it is a contraindication to liver transplantation and in several prognostic scores sorafenib represents its standard of care,due to its antiangiogenetic action,although it can grant only a poor prolongation of life expectancy.Recent scientific evidences lead to consider PVTT as a complex anatomical and clinical condition,including a wide range of patients with different prognosis and new treatment possibilities according to the degree of portal system involvement,tumor biological aggressiveness,complications caused by portal hypertension,patient’s clinical features and tolerance to antineoplastic treatments.The median survival has been reported to range between 2.7 and 4 mo in absence of therapy,but it can vary from 5 mo to 5 years,thus depicting an extremely variable scenario.For this reason,it is extremely important to focus on the most adequate strategy to be applied to each group of PVTT patients.
文摘Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the current standard of care for patients with large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), preserved liver function, absence of cancer-related symptoms and no evidence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread(i.e., those classified as intermediate stage according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system). The rationale for TACE is that the intra-arterial injection of a chemotherapeutic drug such as doxorubicin or cisplatin followed by embolization of the blood vessel will result in a strong cytotoxic effect enhanced by ischemia. However, TACE is a very heterogeneous operative technique and varies in terms of chemotherapeutic agents, treatment devices and schedule. In order to overcome the major drawbacks of conventional TACE(c TACE), non-resorbable drug-eluting beads(DEBs) loaded with cytotoxic drugs have been developed. DEBs are able to slowly release the drug upon injection and increase the intensity and duration of ischemia while enhancing the drug delivery to the tumor. Unfortunately, despite the theoretical advantages of this new device and the promising results of the pivotal studies, definitive data in favor of its superiority over c TACE are still lacking. The recommendation for TACE as the standard-of-care for intermediate-stage HCC is based on the demonstration of improved survival compared with best supportive care or suboptimal therapies in a meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials, but other therapeutic options(namely, surgery and radioembolization) proved competitive in selected subsets of intermediate HCC patients. Other potential fields of application of TACE in hepato-oncology are the pre-transplant setting(as downstaging/bridging treatment) and the early stage(in patients unsuitable to curative therapy). The potential of TACE in selectedadvanced patients with segmental portal vein thrombosis and preserved liver function deserves further reports.
