目的探讨一次性包皮环切缝合器手术治疗包茎、包皮过长患者的疗效及安全性分析。方法选取我院2016年3月~2017年10月治疗的包茎、包皮过长的192例患者作为研究对象,采用随机计数器将其分为A组、B组和C组,每组64例。其中A组行一次性包皮...目的探讨一次性包皮环切缝合器手术治疗包茎、包皮过长患者的疗效及安全性分析。方法选取我院2016年3月~2017年10月治疗的包茎、包皮过长的192例患者作为研究对象,采用随机计数器将其分为A组、B组和C组,每组64例。其中A组行一次性包皮环切缝合器手术治疗,B组行包皮环扎术治疗,C组行传统包皮环切术治疗。比较三组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、外观满意度及并发症发生情况。结果 A组患者的手术时间短于B、C组,术中失血量少于B、C组、术后24 h VAS评分低于B、C组,外观满意度评分高于B、C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组的并发症总发生率低于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论一次性包皮环切缝合器手术应用于包茎、包皮过长患者,临床疗效明确,可缩短手术时间,减少术中失血量,并降低术后疼痛程度,减少并发症发生,安全性较高。展开更多
Introduction: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) reduces chances of contracting HIV during heterosexual intercourse in males, and risk of cervical cancer in their female sexual partners. However, its uptake am...Introduction: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) reduces chances of contracting HIV during heterosexual intercourse in males, and risk of cervical cancer in their female sexual partners. However, its uptake among traditionally circumcising communities, where male circumcision carries a cultural significance, has not been studied. Previous research has focused on barriers to uptake of VMMC in non-circumcising communities. This study was conducted to determine socio-cultural barriers to VMMC uptake in order to identify culture-sensitive and evidence-based interventions to increase its uptake. Methodology: This exploratory mixed methods cross-sectional study generated quantitative data from 262 randomly sampled sexually active men;and qualitative data through four focus-group discussions with 58 purposely selected male participants and 10 key informants. Results: The study established that only 6.3% (n = 15) of those circumcised (90.8%, n = 238) were circumcised in clinical setting. Limited access to VMMC services, cost, pain, being attended to by female providers and cultural influences were the major hindrances to uptake of VMMC. Conclusion: Although there is a paradigm shift of preference from traditional male circumcision to VMMC in this community, its uptake is low. The study recommends that besides introducing mobile VMMC services, the Ministry of Health should collaborate with traditional circumcisers and local leaders to provide gender-and-culture-sensitive safer medical male circumcision services.展开更多
文摘目的探讨一次性包皮环切缝合器手术治疗包茎、包皮过长患者的疗效及安全性分析。方法选取我院2016年3月~2017年10月治疗的包茎、包皮过长的192例患者作为研究对象,采用随机计数器将其分为A组、B组和C组,每组64例。其中A组行一次性包皮环切缝合器手术治疗,B组行包皮环扎术治疗,C组行传统包皮环切术治疗。比较三组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、外观满意度及并发症发生情况。结果 A组患者的手术时间短于B、C组,术中失血量少于B、C组、术后24 h VAS评分低于B、C组,外观满意度评分高于B、C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组的并发症总发生率低于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论一次性包皮环切缝合器手术应用于包茎、包皮过长患者,临床疗效明确,可缩短手术时间,减少术中失血量,并降低术后疼痛程度,减少并发症发生,安全性较高。
文摘Introduction: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) reduces chances of contracting HIV during heterosexual intercourse in males, and risk of cervical cancer in their female sexual partners. However, its uptake among traditionally circumcising communities, where male circumcision carries a cultural significance, has not been studied. Previous research has focused on barriers to uptake of VMMC in non-circumcising communities. This study was conducted to determine socio-cultural barriers to VMMC uptake in order to identify culture-sensitive and evidence-based interventions to increase its uptake. Methodology: This exploratory mixed methods cross-sectional study generated quantitative data from 262 randomly sampled sexually active men;and qualitative data through four focus-group discussions with 58 purposely selected male participants and 10 key informants. Results: The study established that only 6.3% (n = 15) of those circumcised (90.8%, n = 238) were circumcised in clinical setting. Limited access to VMMC services, cost, pain, being attended to by female providers and cultural influences were the major hindrances to uptake of VMMC. Conclusion: Although there is a paradigm shift of preference from traditional male circumcision to VMMC in this community, its uptake is low. The study recommends that besides introducing mobile VMMC services, the Ministry of Health should collaborate with traditional circumcisers and local leaders to provide gender-and-culture-sensitive safer medical male circumcision services.
