With the increasing prevalence of living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),some authors have reported a potential increase in the HCC recurrence rates among LDLT recipie...With the increasing prevalence of living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),some authors have reported a potential increase in the HCC recurrence rates among LDLT recipients compared to deceased-donor liver transplantation(DDLT) recipients.The aim of this review is to encompass current opinions and clinical reports regarding differences in the outcome,especially the recurrence of HCC,between LDLT and DDLT.While some studies report impaired recurrence- free survival and increased recurrence rates among LDLT recipients,others,including large database studies,report comparable recurrence- free survival and recurrence rates between LDLT and DDLT.Studies supporting the increased recurrence in LDLT have linked graft regeneration to tumor progression,but we found no association between graft regeneration/initial graft volume and tumor recurrence among our 125 consecutive LDLTs for HCC cases.In the absence of a prospective study regarding the use of LDLT vs DDLT for HCC patients,there is no evidence to support the higher HCC recurrence after LDLT than DDLT,and LDLT remains a reasonable treatment option for HCC patients with cirrhosis.展开更多
Background Organ transplantation represents an important advance in modern medical science,and it has benefited many patients with organ failure; however,the severe deficiency of organ sources has been a bottleneck th...Background Organ transplantation represents an important advance in modern medical science,and it has benefited many patients with organ failure; however,the severe deficiency of organ sources has been a bottleneck that has limited the benefits -this technology can bring.The aim of this study was to show the results of a survey on Chinese people＇s awareness and attitudes toward organ donation.Methods We designed a questionnaire regarding organ donation consisting of 20 short questions,which were distributed to 10 groups.Most of the questions were multiple-choice; the core question related to people＇s attitudes to organ donation and the development of organ donation.The survey was held in the outpatient hall of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital,a commercial district,and four professional colleges.Participants were randomly selected,and answered questions about gender,age,educational background,profession,and study major.Results In all,2930 valid responses were received.Male：female ratio was nearly 1：1.2 （mean age 38 years）.Over 90.0% of participants knew about organ transplantation and which organs could be transplanted; more than 95.0% knew about organ donation,but the time they had been aware of it varied.Nearly 90.0% of the participants approved of deceased organ donation; 73.0% indicated they would like to donate their organs post mortem.Participants who knew more about organ failure and organ transplantation were more likely to support organ donation.College students were very positive about organ donation,though as they gain professional knowledge their attitudes may change.Altogether,65.3% of participants approved of living organ donation,which was obviously lower than the figure for deceased organ donation （P 〈0.05）.In all,85.7% of participants approved of compensation to the deceased donor＇s family.To promote organ donation in China,62.9% of participants indicated that the public＇s knowledge about organ donation should be increased via the media and various kinds of education.Only 20.0% of 展开更多
AIM: to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver ...AIM: to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data from 408 liver cancer patients from February 1999 to September 2012. We used the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test to analyze the characteristics of LDLT and DDLT. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the RFS and OS in HCC. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty HBV-positive patients (276 DDLT and 84 LDLT) were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 27.1 mo (range 1.1-130.8 mo). One hundred eighty-five (51.2%) patients died during follow-up. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates for LDLT were 85.2%, 55.7%, and 52.9%, respectively; for DDLT, the RFS rates were 73.2%, 49.1%, and 45.3% (P = 0.115). The OS rates were similar between the LDLT and DDLT recipients, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 81.8%, 49.5%, and 43.0% vs 69.5%, 43.0%, and 38.3%, respectively (P = 0.30). The outcomes of HCC according to the Milan criteria after LDLT and DDLT were not significantly different (for LDLT: 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS: 94.7%, 78.7%, and 78.7% vs 89.2%, 77.5%, and 74.5%, P = 0.50; for DDLT: 86.1%, 68.8%, and 68.8% vs 80.5%, 62.2%, and 59.8% P = 0.53). CONCLUSION: The outcomes of LDLT for HCC are not worse compared to the outcomes of DDLT. LDLT does not increase tumor recurrence of HCC compared to DDLT. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.展开更多
Background： The outcome of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation （LT） has not been well studied, especially pediatric deceased donor livers used in adult transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the e...Background： The outcome of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation （LT） has not been well studied, especially pediatric deceased donor livers used in adult transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LT using pediatric deceased donor livers and compare the outcomes between pediatric-to-pediatric LT and pediatric-to-adult LT. Methods： A retrospective review of LT using pediatric deceased donor livers from June 2013 to August 2016 was performed. The patients were divided into the pediatric-to-pediatric LT group and pediatric-to-adult LT group based on the ages of the recipients. The survival and incidence of early vascular complications （VCs） were observed between the two groups. We also analyzed the risk factors of early VCs in pediatric LT and the effect of donor hypernatremia on the prognosis of recipients. Results： There were 102 cases of LT using pediatric deceased donor livers in our hospital from June 2013 to August 2016. 83 pediatric-to-pediatric LT （recipients＇ age ≤13 years） and 19 pediatric-to-adult LT （recipients＇ age≥19 years）. The ratio of early VC was similar in the two groups （19.3% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.514）. Low body weight of recipient was an independent risk factor of early VC in pediatric LT （odds ratio： 0.856, 95% confidence interval： 0.752-0.975, P = 0.019）. The 1-year cumulative survival rates of grafts and patients were 89.16% and 91.57% in pediatric-to-pediatric LT and 89.47% and 94.74% in pediatric-to-adult LT, respectively （all P 〉 0.05）. In all cases. patients using donors with hypernatremia （serum sodium levels ≥ 150mmol/L） had worse graft survival （χ2=4.330, P = 0.037）. Conclusions： Pediatric-to-pediatric LT group has similar graft and patient survival rates with those of pediatric-to-adult LT group. Low body weight of recipients is an independent risk factor of early VC in pediatric LT. Patients using donors with hypernatremia have worse graft survival.展开更多
Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many c...Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many cases there are available alternative treatments such as resection or locoregional therapy.Deciding upon the best option for a patient with HCC is complicated,involving numerous ethical principles including:urgency,utility,intention-to-treat survival,transplant benefit,harm to candidates on waiting list,and harm to living donors.The potential contrast between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with HCC for several reasons:(1)HCC candidates to liver transplantation are increasing;(2)the great prognostic heterogeneity within the HCC population;(3)in HCC patients tumor progression before liver transplantation may significantly impair post transplant outcome;and(4)effective alternative therapies are often available for HCC candidates to liver transplantation.In this paper we suggest that allocating organs by transplant benefit could help balance these competing principles,and also introduce equity between patients with HCC and nonmalignant liver disease.We also propose a triangular equipoise model to help decide between deceased donor liver transplantation,living donor liver transplantation,or alternative therapies.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) has been widely accepted as the treatment of choice for end-stage liver diseases. Due to the scarcity of cadaveric donors, adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT...BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) has been widely accepted as the treatment of choice for end-stage liver diseases. Due to the scarcity of cadaveric donors, adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is advocated as a practical alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, some reports suggest that the long-term and recurrence-free survival rates of LDLT are poorer than those of DDLT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to compare the long-term and recurrence-free survival rates of HCC between LDLT and DDLT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 150 patients with HCC from January 2005 to March 2009. Eleven patients who died of complications during the perioperative period were excluded. The remaining 139 eligible patients (101 DDLT and 38 LDLT) were regularly followed up to October 2009. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare the characteristics of LDLT and DDLT. The long-term and recurrence-free survival curves of both groups were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons performed using the log-rank test. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the waiting time of the two groups. RESULTS: Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years for LDLT were 81%, 62%, 53%, and 45% and for DDLT were 86%, 60%, 50%, and 38%, respectively. The overall 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year recurrence-free rates for LDLT were 71%, 49%, 42%, and 38%, and for DDLT were 76%, 52%, 41%, and 37%, respectively. No significant differences were found by the log-rank test on both long-term and recurrence-free survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: The role of LDLT is reinforced by our study. It may expand the donor pool and achieve the same long-term and recurrence-free survival rates of DDLT.展开更多
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary neoplasm of the liver and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) has become one of the best curative therap...Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary neoplasm of the liver and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) has become one of the best curative therapeutic options for patients with HCC, although tumor recurrence after LT is a major and unaddressed cause of mortality. Furthermore, the factors that are associated with recurrence are not fully understood, and most previous studies have focused on the biological properties of HCC, such as the number and size of the HCC nodules, the degree of differentiation, the presence of hepatic vascular invasion, elevated serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and the tumor stage outside of the Milan criteria. Thus, little attention has been given to factors that are not directly related to HCC (i.e., “non-oncological factors”), which have emerged as predictors of tumor recurrence. This review was performed to assess the effects of non-oncological factors on tumor recurrence after LT. The identification of these factors may provide new research directions and clinical strategies for the prophylaxis and surveillance of tumor recurrence after LT, which can help reduce recurrence and improve patient survival.展开更多
Background:Although a number of technical problems and donor safety issues associated with living donor liver transplantation(LDLT)have been resolved,some initial clinical studies showed an increased risk of hepatocel...Background:Although a number of technical problems and donor safety issues associated with living donor liver transplantation(LDLT)have been resolved,some initial clinical studies showed an increased risk of hepatocellular car cinoma(HCC)recurrence in LDLT.This meta-analysis was conducted to assess differences in tumor recurrence between LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation(DDLT).Methods:After systematic retrievals of studies about LDLT and DDLT for HCC,articles were selected with a rationale of emphasizing inter-group comparability.Results from multivariate analyses were combined and discussed together with univariate analyses.In subgroup analysis,the impact of organ allocation policy was taken into consideration.Results:Seven articles were included in the meta-analysis.Overall,a salient result that emerged from the seven studies was a significant increased risk of HCC recurrence in the LDLT group than in the DDLT group(P=0.01).The most significant increase in hazard ratio was found in studies where organs tended to be allocated to non-tumor patients.Conclusions:An increased risk for HCC recurrence in LDLT as compared with DDLT patients was found.The relatively shorter preoperative observation windows in LDLT may lead to fewer cases of HCC with invasive features being screened out,which may provide a possible explanation for the high rates of HCC recurrence.展开更多
AIM To analyse the risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function(DGF) in patients receiving a steroid sparing protocol. METHODS Four hundred and twenty-seven recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were ...AIM To analyse the risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function(DGF) in patients receiving a steroid sparing protocol. METHODS Four hundred and twenty-seven recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were studied of which 135(31.6%) experienced DGF. All patients received monoclonal antibody induction with a tacrolimus based, steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.RESULTS Five year patient survival was 87.2% and 94.9% in the DGF and primary graft function(PGF) group respectively, P = 0.047. Allograft survival was 77.9% and 90.2% in the DGF and PGF group respectively, P < 0.001. Overall rejection free survival was no different between the DGF and PGF groups with a 1 and 5 year rejection free survival in the DGF group of 77.7% and 67.8% compared with 81.3% and 75.3% in the PGF group, P = 0.19. Patients with DGF who received IL2 receptor antibody induction were at significantly higher risk of rejection in the early post-transplant period than the group with DGF who received alemtuzumab induction. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for DGF were male recipients, recipients of black ethnicity, circulatory death donation, preformed DSA, increasing cold ischaemic time, older donor age and dialysis vintage.CONCLUSION Alemtuzumab induction may be of benefit in preventing early rejection episodes associated with DGF. Prospective trials are required to determine optimal immunotherapy protocols for patients at high risk of DGF.展开更多
AIM:To investigate health-related quality of life(HRQoL) and psychological outcomes in 256 adults who had undergone liver transplantation(LT).METHODS:A stratified random sampling method was used in this follow-up mult...AIM:To investigate health-related quality of life(HRQoL) and psychological outcomes in 256 adults who had undergone liver transplantation(LT).METHODS:A stratified random sampling method was used in this follow-up multicenter study to select a representative sample of recipients undergoing either living donor liver transplantation(LDLT) or deceased donor liver transplantation(DDLT).HRQoL was measured by using the Chinese version of Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36(SF-36),and psychological outcomes by using the beck anxiety inventory(BAI) and the self-rating depression scale(SDS).Clinical and demographic data were collected from the records of the Chinese Liver Transplant Registry and via questionnaires.RESULTS:A total of 256 patients were sampled,including 66(25.8%) receiving LDLT and 190(74.2%) undergoing DDLT;15(5.9%) recipients had anxiety and four(1.6%) developed severe depression after the operation.Compared with LDLT recipients,DDLT patients had higher scores in general health(60.33 ± 16.97 vs 66.86 ± 18.42,P = 0.012),role-physical(63.64 ± 42.55 vs 74.47 ± 36.46,P = 0.048),roleemotional(61.11 ± 44.37 vs 78.95 ± 34.31,P = 0.001),social functioning(78.60 ± 22.76 vs 88.16 ± 21.85,P = 0.003),vitality(70.30 ± 15.76 vs 75.95 ± 16.40,P = 0.016),mental health(65.88 ± 12.94 vs 71.85 ± 15.45,P = 0.005),physical component summary scale(PCS,60.07 ± 7.36 vs 62.58 ± 6.88,P = 0.013) and mental component summary scale(MCS,52.65 ± 7.66 vs 55.95 ± 10.14,P = 0.016).Recipients > 45 years old at the time of transplant scored higher in vitality(77.33 ± 15.64 vs 72.52 ± 16.66,P = 0.020),mental health(73.64 ± 15.06 vs 68.00 ± 14.65,P = 0.003) and MCS(56.61 ± 10.00 vs 54.05 ± 9.30,P = 0.037) than those aged ≤ 45 years.MCS was poorer in recipients with than in those without complications(52.92 ± 12.21 vs 56.06 ± 8.16,P = 0.017).Regarding MCS(55.10 ± 9.66 vs 50.0 ± 10.0,P < 0.05) and PCS(61.93 ± 7.08 vs 50.0 ± 10.0,P < 0.05),recipients scored better than the Sichuan general and had improved overall QoL展开更多
The increasing demand for organ donors to supply the increasing number of patients on kidney waiting lists has led to most transplant centers developing protocols that allow safe utilization from donors with special c...The increasing demand for organ donors to supply the increasing number of patients on kidney waiting lists has led to most transplant centers developing protocols that allow safe utilization from donors with special clinical situations which previously were regarded as contraindications. Deceased donors with previous hepatitis C infection may represent a safe resource to expand the donor pool. When allocated to serology-matched recipients, kidney transplantation from donors with hepatitis C may result in an excellent short-term outcome and a significant reduction of time on the waiting list. Special care must be dedicated to the pre-transplant evaluation of potential candidates, particularly with regard to liver functionality and evidence of liver histological damage, such as cirrhosis, that could be a contraindication to transplantation. Pre-transplant antiviral therapy could be useful to reduce the viral load and to improve the long-term results, which may be affected by the progression of liver disease in the recipients. An accurate selection of both donor and recipient is mandatory to achieve a satisfactory long-term outcome.展开更多
BACKGROUND The outcomes of liver transplantation(LT)from different grafts have been studied individually and in combination,but the reports were conflicting with some researchers finding no difference in both short-te...BACKGROUND The outcomes of liver transplantation(LT)from different grafts have been studied individually and in combination,but the reports were conflicting with some researchers finding no difference in both short-term and long-term outcomes between the deceased donor split LT(DD-SLT)and living donor LT(LDLT).AIM To compare the outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS This systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.The following databases were searched for articles comparing outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT:PubMed;Google Scholar;Embase;Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials;the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;and Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/).The search terms used were:“liver transplantation;”“liver transplant;”“split liver transplant;”“living donor liver transplant;”“partial liver transplant;”“partial liver graft;”“ex vivo splitting;”and“in vivo splitting.”RESULTS Ten studies were included for the data synthesis and meta-analysis.There were a total of 4836 patients.The overall survival rate at 1 year,3 years and 5 years was superior in patients that received LDLT compared to DD-SLT.At 1 year,the hazard ratios was 1.44(95%confidence interval:1.16-1.78;P=0.001).The graft survival rate at 3 years and 5 years was superior in the LDLT group(3 year hazard ratio:1.28;95%confidence interval:1.01-1.63;P=0.04).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that LDLT has better graft survival and overall survival when compared to DD-SLT.展开更多
Background and aims:Many centers do not offer living donor transplants for patients in need of a liver retransplant.We aimed to study our liver retransplant outcomes using living donors and compared them with those of...Background and aims:Many centers do not offer living donor transplants for patients in need of a liver retransplant.We aimed to study our liver retransplant outcomes using living donors and compared them with those of retransplants performed using deceased donors.Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed all retransplants performed at our center between 2009 and 2023,and outcomes of living donor retransplants were compared with deceased donor retransplants using standard statistical tests.Results:Between January 2009 and March 2023,a total of 77 retransplants,60 with deceased donors and 17 with living donors,were performed.Important demographic differences between the two groups included a higher model for end-stage liver disease score in the deceased donor group(32.1±6.1 vs.19.4±5.7,P<0.001)and a higher number of early retransplants(within 3 months of the initial transplant),which accounted for 35% of deceased donor transplants but 0 of living donor transplants(P<0.01).Overall,the patient and graft survival rates were comparable between the two groups.The patient survival rates at 1 and 3 years after transplant were 73% and 67% in the deceased donor group and 84% and 73% in the living donor group,respectively(P=0.57).The hospital length of stay and blood product use were both better in the living donor group.Biliary complications did not show significant different between the two groups(P=0.33).Conclusions:Living donors can provide acceptable outcomes for those in need of a retransplant,with results comparable to those seen with deceased donors.A systematic approach to the patient in the pre-,peri-,and post-transplantation period is important in these complicated cases.展开更多
AIM To systematically review reports on deceased-donor-lobar lung transplantation(dd LLTx) and uniformly describe sizematching using the donor-to-recipient predicted-total lung-capacity(pT LC) ratio. METHODS We set ou...AIM To systematically review reports on deceased-donor-lobar lung transplantation(dd LLTx) and uniformly describe sizematching using the donor-to-recipient predicted-total lung-capacity(pT LC) ratio. METHODS We set out to systematically review reports on ddL LTx and uniformly describe size matching using the donorto-recipient pT LC ratio and to summarize reported oneyear survival data of ddL LTx and conventional-LTx. We searched in Pub Med, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Wiley(CDSR),Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Wiley(DARE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Wiley(CENTRAL), Scopus(which includes EMBASE abstracts), and Web of Science for original reports on ddL LTx. RESULTS Nine observational cohort studies reporting on 301 ddL LTx met our inclusion criteria for systematic review of size matching, and eight for describing one-year-survival. The dd LLTx-group was often characterized by high acuity;however there was heterogeneity in transplant indications and pre-operative characteristics between studies. Data to calculate the pT LC ratio was available for 242 ddL LTx(80%). The mean pT LCratio before lobar resection was1.25 ± 0.3 and the transplanted pT LCratio after lobar resection was 0.76 ± 0.2. One-year survival in the ddL LTxgroup ranged from 50%-100%, compared to 72%-88%in the conventional-LTx group. In the largest study ddL LTx(n = 138) was associated with a lower one-year-survival compared to conventional-LTx(n = 539)(65.1% vs84.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Further investigations of optimal donor-to-recipient size matching parameters for ddL LTx could improve outcomes of this important surgical option.展开更多
文摘With the increasing prevalence of living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),some authors have reported a potential increase in the HCC recurrence rates among LDLT recipients compared to deceased-donor liver transplantation(DDLT) recipients.The aim of this review is to encompass current opinions and clinical reports regarding differences in the outcome,especially the recurrence of HCC,between LDLT and DDLT.While some studies report impaired recurrence- free survival and increased recurrence rates among LDLT recipients,others,including large database studies,report comparable recurrence- free survival and recurrence rates between LDLT and DDLT.Studies supporting the increased recurrence in LDLT have linked graft regeneration to tumor progression,but we found no association between graft regeneration/initial graft volume and tumor recurrence among our 125 consecutive LDLTs for HCC cases.In the absence of a prospective study regarding the use of LDLT vs DDLT for HCC patients,there is no evidence to support the higher HCC recurrence after LDLT than DDLT,and LDLT remains a reasonable treatment option for HCC patients with cirrhosis.
文摘Background Organ transplantation represents an important advance in modern medical science,and it has benefited many patients with organ failure; however,the severe deficiency of organ sources has been a bottleneck that has limited the benefits -this technology can bring.The aim of this study was to show the results of a survey on Chinese people＇s awareness and attitudes toward organ donation.Methods We designed a questionnaire regarding organ donation consisting of 20 short questions,which were distributed to 10 groups.Most of the questions were multiple-choice; the core question related to people＇s attitudes to organ donation and the development of organ donation.The survey was held in the outpatient hall of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital,a commercial district,and four professional colleges.Participants were randomly selected,and answered questions about gender,age,educational background,profession,and study major.Results In all,2930 valid responses were received.Male：female ratio was nearly 1：1.2 （mean age 38 years）.Over 90.0% of participants knew about organ transplantation and which organs could be transplanted; more than 95.0% knew about organ donation,but the time they had been aware of it varied.Nearly 90.0% of the participants approved of deceased organ donation; 73.0% indicated they would like to donate their organs post mortem.Participants who knew more about organ failure and organ transplantation were more likely to support organ donation.College students were very positive about organ donation,though as they gain professional knowledge their attitudes may change.Altogether,65.3% of participants approved of living organ donation,which was obviously lower than the figure for deceased organ donation （P 〈0.05）.In all,85.7% of participants approved of compensation to the deceased donor＇s family.To promote organ donation in China,62.9% of participants indicated that the public＇s knowledge about organ donation should be increased via the media and various kinds of education.Only 20.0% of
基金Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project of China,No.2012ZX10002-016 and No.2012ZX10002017-017
文摘AIM: to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data from 408 liver cancer patients from February 1999 to September 2012. We used the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test to analyze the characteristics of LDLT and DDLT. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the RFS and OS in HCC. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty HBV-positive patients (276 DDLT and 84 LDLT) were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 27.1 mo (range 1.1-130.8 mo). One hundred eighty-five (51.2%) patients died during follow-up. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates for LDLT were 85.2%, 55.7%, and 52.9%, respectively; for DDLT, the RFS rates were 73.2%, 49.1%, and 45.3% (P = 0.115). The OS rates were similar between the LDLT and DDLT recipients, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 81.8%, 49.5%, and 43.0% vs 69.5%, 43.0%, and 38.3%, respectively (P = 0.30). The outcomes of HCC according to the Milan criteria after LDLT and DDLT were not significantly different (for LDLT: 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS: 94.7%, 78.7%, and 78.7% vs 89.2%, 77.5%, and 74.5%, P = 0.50; for DDLT: 86.1%, 68.8%, and 68.8% vs 80.5%, 62.2%, and 59.8% P = 0.53). CONCLUSION: The outcomes of LDLT for HCC are not worse compared to the outcomes of DDLT. LDLT does not increase tumor recurrence of HCC compared to DDLT. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
文摘Background： The outcome of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation （LT） has not been well studied, especially pediatric deceased donor livers used in adult transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LT using pediatric deceased donor livers and compare the outcomes between pediatric-to-pediatric LT and pediatric-to-adult LT. Methods： A retrospective review of LT using pediatric deceased donor livers from June 2013 to August 2016 was performed. The patients were divided into the pediatric-to-pediatric LT group and pediatric-to-adult LT group based on the ages of the recipients. The survival and incidence of early vascular complications （VCs） were observed between the two groups. We also analyzed the risk factors of early VCs in pediatric LT and the effect of donor hypernatremia on the prognosis of recipients. Results： There were 102 cases of LT using pediatric deceased donor livers in our hospital from June 2013 to August 2016. 83 pediatric-to-pediatric LT （recipients＇ age ≤13 years） and 19 pediatric-to-adult LT （recipients＇ age≥19 years）. The ratio of early VC was similar in the two groups （19.3% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.514）. Low body weight of recipient was an independent risk factor of early VC in pediatric LT （odds ratio： 0.856, 95% confidence interval： 0.752-0.975, P = 0.019）. The 1-year cumulative survival rates of grafts and patients were 89.16% and 91.57% in pediatric-to-pediatric LT and 89.47% and 94.74% in pediatric-to-adult LT, respectively （all P 〉 0.05）. In all cases. patients using donors with hypernatremia （serum sodium levels ≥ 150mmol/L） had worse graft survival （χ2=4.330, P = 0.037）. Conclusions： Pediatric-to-pediatric LT group has similar graft and patient survival rates with those of pediatric-to-adult LT group. Low body weight of recipients is an independent risk factor of early VC in pediatric LT. Patients using donors with hypernatremia have worse graft survival.
文摘Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many cases there are available alternative treatments such as resection or locoregional therapy.Deciding upon the best option for a patient with HCC is complicated,involving numerous ethical principles including:urgency,utility,intention-to-treat survival,transplant benefit,harm to candidates on waiting list,and harm to living donors.The potential contrast between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with HCC for several reasons:(1)HCC candidates to liver transplantation are increasing;(2)the great prognostic heterogeneity within the HCC population;(3)in HCC patients tumor progression before liver transplantation may significantly impair post transplant outcome;and(4)effective alternative therapies are often available for HCC candidates to liver transplantation.In this paper we suggest that allocating organs by transplant benefit could help balance these competing principles,and also introduce equity between patients with HCC and nonmalignant liver disease.We also propose a triangular equipoise model to help decide between deceased donor liver transplantation,living donor liver transplantation,or alternative therapies.
文摘BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) has been widely accepted as the treatment of choice for end-stage liver diseases. Due to the scarcity of cadaveric donors, adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is advocated as a practical alternative to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, some reports suggest that the long-term and recurrence-free survival rates of LDLT are poorer than those of DDLT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to compare the long-term and recurrence-free survival rates of HCC between LDLT and DDLT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 150 patients with HCC from January 2005 to March 2009. Eleven patients who died of complications during the perioperative period were excluded. The remaining 139 eligible patients (101 DDLT and 38 LDLT) were regularly followed up to October 2009. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare the characteristics of LDLT and DDLT. The long-term and recurrence-free survival curves of both groups were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons performed using the log-rank test. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the waiting time of the two groups. RESULTS: Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years for LDLT were 81%, 62%, 53%, and 45% and for DDLT were 86%, 60%, 50%, and 38%, respectively. The overall 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year recurrence-free rates for LDLT were 71%, 49%, 42%, and 38%, and for DDLT were 76%, 52%, 41%, and 37%, respectively. No significant differences were found by the log-rank test on both long-term and recurrence-free survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: The role of LDLT is reinforced by our study. It may expand the donor pool and achieve the same long-term and recurrence-free survival rates of DDLT.
基金Supported by National High-Tech R and D Program(863 Program,No.2012AA021003)the Tianjin Municipal Health Bureau Key Project,No.13KG103
文摘Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary neoplasm of the liver and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) has become one of the best curative therapeutic options for patients with HCC, although tumor recurrence after LT is a major and unaddressed cause of mortality. Furthermore, the factors that are associated with recurrence are not fully understood, and most previous studies have focused on the biological properties of HCC, such as the number and size of the HCC nodules, the degree of differentiation, the presence of hepatic vascular invasion, elevated serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and the tumor stage outside of the Milan criteria. Thus, little attention has been given to factors that are not directly related to HCC (i.e., “non-oncological factors”), which have emerged as predictors of tumor recurrence. This review was performed to assess the effects of non-oncological factors on tumor recurrence after LT. The identification of these factors may provide new research directions and clinical strategies for the prophylaxis and surveillance of tumor recurrence after LT, which can help reduce recurrence and improve patient survival.
基金grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.71603272)National Science and Technology Major Project(No.2017ZX10203205-001-005).
文摘Background:Although a number of technical problems and donor safety issues associated with living donor liver transplantation(LDLT)have been resolved,some initial clinical studies showed an increased risk of hepatocellular car cinoma(HCC)recurrence in LDLT.This meta-analysis was conducted to assess differences in tumor recurrence between LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation(DDLT).Methods:After systematic retrievals of studies about LDLT and DDLT for HCC,articles were selected with a rationale of emphasizing inter-group comparability.Results from multivariate analyses were combined and discussed together with univariate analyses.In subgroup analysis,the impact of organ allocation policy was taken into consideration.Results:Seven articles were included in the meta-analysis.Overall,a salient result that emerged from the seven studies was a significant increased risk of HCC recurrence in the LDLT group than in the DDLT group(P=0.01).The most significant increase in hazard ratio was found in studies where organs tended to be allocated to non-tumor patients.Conclusions:An increased risk for HCC recurrence in LDLT as compared with DDLT patients was found.The relatively shorter preoperative observation windows in LDLT may lead to fewer cases of HCC with invasive features being screened out,which may provide a possible explanation for the high rates of HCC recurrence.
文摘AIM To analyse the risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function(DGF) in patients receiving a steroid sparing protocol. METHODS Four hundred and twenty-seven recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were studied of which 135(31.6%) experienced DGF. All patients received monoclonal antibody induction with a tacrolimus based, steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.RESULTS Five year patient survival was 87.2% and 94.9% in the DGF and primary graft function(PGF) group respectively, P = 0.047. Allograft survival was 77.9% and 90.2% in the DGF and PGF group respectively, P < 0.001. Overall rejection free survival was no different between the DGF and PGF groups with a 1 and 5 year rejection free survival in the DGF group of 77.7% and 67.8% compared with 81.3% and 75.3% in the PGF group, P = 0.19. Patients with DGF who received IL2 receptor antibody induction were at significantly higher risk of rejection in the early post-transplant period than the group with DGF who received alemtuzumab induction. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for DGF were male recipients, recipients of black ethnicity, circulatory death donation, preformed DSA, increasing cold ischaemic time, older donor age and dialysis vintage.CONCLUSION Alemtuzumab induction may be of benefit in preventing early rejection episodes associated with DGF. Prospective trials are required to determine optimal immunotherapy protocols for patients at high risk of DGF.
基金Supported by A grant from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China,No.2008ZX10002-025, 2008ZX10002-026
文摘AIM:To investigate health-related quality of life(HRQoL) and psychological outcomes in 256 adults who had undergone liver transplantation(LT).METHODS:A stratified random sampling method was used in this follow-up multicenter study to select a representative sample of recipients undergoing either living donor liver transplantation(LDLT) or deceased donor liver transplantation(DDLT).HRQoL was measured by using the Chinese version of Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36(SF-36),and psychological outcomes by using the beck anxiety inventory(BAI) and the self-rating depression scale(SDS).Clinical and demographic data were collected from the records of the Chinese Liver Transplant Registry and via questionnaires.RESULTS:A total of 256 patients were sampled,including 66(25.8%) receiving LDLT and 190(74.2%) undergoing DDLT;15(5.9%) recipients had anxiety and four(1.6%) developed severe depression after the operation.Compared with LDLT recipients,DDLT patients had higher scores in general health(60.33 ± 16.97 vs 66.86 ± 18.42,P = 0.012),role-physical(63.64 ± 42.55 vs 74.47 ± 36.46,P = 0.048),roleemotional(61.11 ± 44.37 vs 78.95 ± 34.31,P = 0.001),social functioning(78.60 ± 22.76 vs 88.16 ± 21.85,P = 0.003),vitality(70.30 ± 15.76 vs 75.95 ± 16.40,P = 0.016),mental health(65.88 ± 12.94 vs 71.85 ± 15.45,P = 0.005),physical component summary scale(PCS,60.07 ± 7.36 vs 62.58 ± 6.88,P = 0.013) and mental component summary scale(MCS,52.65 ± 7.66 vs 55.95 ± 10.14,P = 0.016).Recipients > 45 years old at the time of transplant scored higher in vitality(77.33 ± 15.64 vs 72.52 ± 16.66,P = 0.020),mental health(73.64 ± 15.06 vs 68.00 ± 14.65,P = 0.003) and MCS(56.61 ± 10.00 vs 54.05 ± 9.30,P = 0.037) than those aged ≤ 45 years.MCS was poorer in recipients with than in those without complications(52.92 ± 12.21 vs 56.06 ± 8.16,P = 0.017).Regarding MCS(55.10 ± 9.66 vs 50.0 ± 10.0,P < 0.05) and PCS(61.93 ± 7.08 vs 50.0 ± 10.0,P < 0.05),recipients scored better than the Sichuan general and had improved overall QoL
文摘The increasing demand for organ donors to supply the increasing number of patients on kidney waiting lists has led to most transplant centers developing protocols that allow safe utilization from donors with special clinical situations which previously were regarded as contraindications. Deceased donors with previous hepatitis C infection may represent a safe resource to expand the donor pool. When allocated to serology-matched recipients, kidney transplantation from donors with hepatitis C may result in an excellent short-term outcome and a significant reduction of time on the waiting list. Special care must be dedicated to the pre-transplant evaluation of potential candidates, particularly with regard to liver functionality and evidence of liver histological damage, such as cirrhosis, that could be a contraindication to transplantation. Pre-transplant antiviral therapy could be useful to reduce the viral load and to improve the long-term results, which may be affected by the progression of liver disease in the recipients. An accurate selection of both donor and recipient is mandatory to achieve a satisfactory long-term outcome.
文摘BACKGROUND The outcomes of liver transplantation(LT)from different grafts have been studied individually and in combination,but the reports were conflicting with some researchers finding no difference in both short-term and long-term outcomes between the deceased donor split LT(DD-SLT)and living donor LT(LDLT).AIM To compare the outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS This systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.The following databases were searched for articles comparing outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT:PubMed;Google Scholar;Embase;Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials;the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;and Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/).The search terms used were:“liver transplantation;”“liver transplant;”“split liver transplant;”“living donor liver transplant;”“partial liver transplant;”“partial liver graft;”“ex vivo splitting;”and“in vivo splitting.”RESULTS Ten studies were included for the data synthesis and meta-analysis.There were a total of 4836 patients.The overall survival rate at 1 year,3 years and 5 years was superior in patients that received LDLT compared to DD-SLT.At 1 year,the hazard ratios was 1.44(95%confidence interval:1.16-1.78;P=0.001).The graft survival rate at 3 years and 5 years was superior in the LDLT group(3 year hazard ratio:1.28;95%confidence interval:1.01-1.63;P=0.04).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that LDLT has better graft survival and overall survival when compared to DD-SLT.
文摘Background and aims:Many centers do not offer living donor transplants for patients in need of a liver retransplant.We aimed to study our liver retransplant outcomes using living donors and compared them with those of retransplants performed using deceased donors.Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed all retransplants performed at our center between 2009 and 2023,and outcomes of living donor retransplants were compared with deceased donor retransplants using standard statistical tests.Results:Between January 2009 and March 2023,a total of 77 retransplants,60 with deceased donors and 17 with living donors,were performed.Important demographic differences between the two groups included a higher model for end-stage liver disease score in the deceased donor group(32.1±6.1 vs.19.4±5.7,P<0.001)and a higher number of early retransplants(within 3 months of the initial transplant),which accounted for 35% of deceased donor transplants but 0 of living donor transplants(P<0.01).Overall,the patient and graft survival rates were comparable between the two groups.The patient survival rates at 1 and 3 years after transplant were 73% and 67% in the deceased donor group and 84% and 73% in the living donor group,respectively(P=0.57).The hospital length of stay and blood product use were both better in the living donor group.Biliary complications did not show significant different between the two groups(P=0.33).Conclusions:Living donors can provide acceptable outcomes for those in need of a retransplant,with results comparable to those seen with deceased donors.A systematic approach to the patient in the pre-,peri-,and post-transplantation period is important in these complicated cases.
基金the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI)
文摘AIM To systematically review reports on deceased-donor-lobar lung transplantation(dd LLTx) and uniformly describe sizematching using the donor-to-recipient predicted-total lung-capacity(pT LC) ratio. METHODS We set out to systematically review reports on ddL LTx and uniformly describe size matching using the donorto-recipient pT LC ratio and to summarize reported oneyear survival data of ddL LTx and conventional-LTx. We searched in Pub Med, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Wiley(CDSR),Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Wiley(DARE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Wiley(CENTRAL), Scopus(which includes EMBASE abstracts), and Web of Science for original reports on ddL LTx. RESULTS Nine observational cohort studies reporting on 301 ddL LTx met our inclusion criteria for systematic review of size matching, and eight for describing one-year-survival. The dd LLTx-group was often characterized by high acuity;however there was heterogeneity in transplant indications and pre-operative characteristics between studies. Data to calculate the pT LC ratio was available for 242 ddL LTx(80%). The mean pT LCratio before lobar resection was1.25 ± 0.3 and the transplanted pT LCratio after lobar resection was 0.76 ± 0.2. One-year survival in the ddL LTxgroup ranged from 50%-100%, compared to 72%-88%in the conventional-LTx group. In the largest study ddL LTx(n = 138) was associated with a lower one-year-survival compared to conventional-LTx(n = 539)(65.1% vs84.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Further investigations of optimal donor-to-recipient size matching parameters for ddL LTx could improve outcomes of this important surgical option.
