Stress urinary incontinence （SUI） and end-stage erectile dysfunction （ED） after radical prostatectomy （RP） can decrease a patient＇s quality of life （QoL）. We describe a surgical technique involving scrotal in...Stress urinary incontinence （SUI） and end-stage erectile dysfunction （ED） after radical prostatectomy （RP） can decrease a patient＇s quality of life （QoL）. We describe a surgical technique involving scrotal incision for simultaneous dual implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter （AUS） and an inflatable penile prosthesis （IPP）. Patients with moderate to severe SUI （〉3 pads per day） and end-stage ED following RP were selected for dual implantation. An upper transverse scrotal incision was made, followed by bulbar urethra dissection and AUS cuff placement. Through the same incision, the corpora cavernosa was exposed, and an IPP positioned. Followed by extraperitoneal reservoirs placement and pumps introduced in the scrotum. Short-term, intra- and post-operative complications; continence status and erectile function; and patient satisfaction and QoL were recorded. A total of 32 patients underwent dual implantation. Early AUS-related complications were： AUS reservoir migration and urethral erosion. One case of distal corporal extrusion occurred. No prosthetic infection was reported. Over 96% of patients were socially the continent （≤1 pad per day） and 〉95% had sufficient erections for intercourse. Limitations of the study were the small number of patients, the lack of the control group using a perineal approach for AUS placement and only a 12 months follow-up. IPP and AUS dual implantation using a single scrotal incision technique is a safe and effective option in patients with SUI and ED after RP. Further studies on larger numbers of patients are warranted.展开更多
文摘Stress urinary incontinence （SUI） and end-stage erectile dysfunction （ED） after radical prostatectomy （RP） can decrease a patient＇s quality of life （QoL）. We describe a surgical technique involving scrotal incision for simultaneous dual implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter （AUS） and an inflatable penile prosthesis （IPP）. Patients with moderate to severe SUI （〉3 pads per day） and end-stage ED following RP were selected for dual implantation. An upper transverse scrotal incision was made, followed by bulbar urethra dissection and AUS cuff placement. Through the same incision, the corpora cavernosa was exposed, and an IPP positioned. Followed by extraperitoneal reservoirs placement and pumps introduced in the scrotum. Short-term, intra- and post-operative complications; continence status and erectile function; and patient satisfaction and QoL were recorded. A total of 32 patients underwent dual implantation. Early AUS-related complications were： AUS reservoir migration and urethral erosion. One case of distal corporal extrusion occurred. No prosthetic infection was reported. Over 96% of patients were socially the continent （≤1 pad per day） and 〉95% had sufficient erections for intercourse. Limitations of the study were the small number of patients, the lack of the control group using a perineal approach for AUS placement and only a 12 months follow-up. IPP and AUS dual implantation using a single scrotal incision technique is a safe and effective option in patients with SUI and ED after RP. Further studies on larger numbers of patients are warranted.
