目的:探讨抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)联合全视网膜光凝术(PRP)治疗重度非增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变(sNPDR)合并黄斑水肿(DME)对黄斑区血流密度变化的影响。方法:回顾性选取2018-10/2019-04在我院确诊的sNPDR合并DME患者30例30眼,根据治疗...目的:探讨抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)联合全视网膜光凝术(PRP)治疗重度非增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变(sNPDR)合并黄斑水肿(DME)对黄斑区血流密度变化的影响。方法:回顾性选取2018-10/2019-04在我院确诊的sNPDR合并DME患者30例30眼,根据治疗方案进行分组,其中A组15例15眼采用“1+PRN”方案采用玻璃体腔内注射雷珠单抗7d后行PRP治疗,B组15例15眼采用单纯PRP治疗。对比两组治疗前后黄斑区6mm×6mm浅层毛细血管(SCP)和深层毛细血管(DCP)血流密度、黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)变化情况。结果:与术前相比,A组患者术后2wk,1mo DCP血流密度显著增加、CMT明显降低、BCVA明显改善(均P<0.05),B组患者术后1mo CMT降低、BCVA改善(均P<0.05)。术后2wk、1mo,A组患者DCP血流密度较B组明显增加(43.37%±2.72%vs 41.03%±2.60%,45.01%±2.28%vs 41.20%±2.43%,均P<0.05),CMT较B组明显降低(303.4±30.36μm vs 329.60±31.47μm,268.67±30.27μm vs 319.40±28.63μm,均P<0.05),BCVA(LogMAR)较B组明显改善(0.28±0.11 vs 0.40±0.13,0.23±0.14 vs 0.38±0.15,均P<0.05)。结论:抗VEGF联合PRP治疗sNPDR合并DME患者短期内可有效增加DCP血流密度,减轻黄斑水肿,改善视力。展开更多
●AIM:To evaluate the long-term effects of pattern scan laser(PASCAL)pan-retinal photocoagulation(PRP)on diabetic retinopathy(DR)in Chinese patients.●METHODS:In this retrospective study,we evaluated clinical data of ...●AIM:To evaluate the long-term effects of pattern scan laser(PASCAL)pan-retinal photocoagulation(PRP)on diabetic retinopathy(DR)in Chinese patients.●METHODS:In this retrospective study,we evaluated clinical data of 29 patients(53 eyes)with severe non-proliferative DR(SNPDR)or proliferative DR(PDR)who received PRP and follow-up at our hospital from 2008 to 2013.Sixteen patients(29 eyes)received PASCAL PRP and 13 patients(24 eyes)received 100-ms conventional laser PRP.●RESULTS:After long-term follow-up(mean,min-max days:719.8,290-1666 for PASCAL PRP vs 743.5,240-1348 for conventional PRP,P=0.569),patients receiving PASCAL PRP required fewer photocoagulation sessions than the conventional PRP group(2.6±1.0 vs 3.9±0.9,P<0.01).Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)was reduced slightly in PASCAL PRP group while reduced significantly in conventional PRP group.At last visit,24 eyes in the PASCAL group(88.9%)and 21 eyes in the conventional group(91.7%)were improved or stable.Two eyes in PASCAL PRP group(7.4%)and 3 eyes in the conventional PRP group(12.5%)developed vitreous hemorrhage or vitreous fibrovascular proliferation.●CONCLUSION:PASCAL PRP is as effective and may be more conducive to maintaining visual acuity with less treatment sessions for DR treatment compared to conventional laser PRP.展开更多
文摘目的:探讨抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)联合全视网膜光凝术(PRP)治疗重度非增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变(sNPDR)合并黄斑水肿(DME)对黄斑区血流密度变化的影响。方法:回顾性选取2018-10/2019-04在我院确诊的sNPDR合并DME患者30例30眼,根据治疗方案进行分组,其中A组15例15眼采用“1+PRN”方案采用玻璃体腔内注射雷珠单抗7d后行PRP治疗,B组15例15眼采用单纯PRP治疗。对比两组治疗前后黄斑区6mm×6mm浅层毛细血管(SCP)和深层毛细血管(DCP)血流密度、黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)变化情况。结果:与术前相比,A组患者术后2wk,1mo DCP血流密度显著增加、CMT明显降低、BCVA明显改善(均P<0.05),B组患者术后1mo CMT降低、BCVA改善(均P<0.05)。术后2wk、1mo,A组患者DCP血流密度较B组明显增加(43.37%±2.72%vs 41.03%±2.60%,45.01%±2.28%vs 41.20%±2.43%,均P<0.05),CMT较B组明显降低(303.4±30.36μm vs 329.60±31.47μm,268.67±30.27μm vs 319.40±28.63μm,均P<0.05),BCVA(LogMAR)较B组明显改善(0.28±0.11 vs 0.40±0.13,0.23±0.14 vs 0.38±0.15,均P<0.05)。结论:抗VEGF联合PRP治疗sNPDR合并DME患者短期内可有效增加DCP血流密度,减轻黄斑水肿,改善视力。
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81670866)Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Project(No.2013007).
文摘●AIM:To evaluate the long-term effects of pattern scan laser(PASCAL)pan-retinal photocoagulation(PRP)on diabetic retinopathy(DR)in Chinese patients.●METHODS:In this retrospective study,we evaluated clinical data of 29 patients(53 eyes)with severe non-proliferative DR(SNPDR)or proliferative DR(PDR)who received PRP and follow-up at our hospital from 2008 to 2013.Sixteen patients(29 eyes)received PASCAL PRP and 13 patients(24 eyes)received 100-ms conventional laser PRP.●RESULTS:After long-term follow-up(mean,min-max days:719.8,290-1666 for PASCAL PRP vs 743.5,240-1348 for conventional PRP,P=0.569),patients receiving PASCAL PRP required fewer photocoagulation sessions than the conventional PRP group(2.6±1.0 vs 3.9±0.9,P<0.01).Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)was reduced slightly in PASCAL PRP group while reduced significantly in conventional PRP group.At last visit,24 eyes in the PASCAL group(88.9%)and 21 eyes in the conventional group(91.7%)were improved or stable.Two eyes in PASCAL PRP group(7.4%)and 3 eyes in the conventional PRP group(12.5%)developed vitreous hemorrhage or vitreous fibrovascular proliferation.●CONCLUSION:PASCAL PRP is as effective and may be more conducive to maintaining visual acuity with less treatment sessions for DR treatment compared to conventional laser PRP.
