目的观察分析感染根管一次性根管治疗的术后反应和短期治愈情况,评价一次性根管治疗的临床可行性。方法临床诊断为牙髓坏死和急、慢性根尖周炎的患牙在一次治疗内完成根管预备和根管充填,共100例,与42例两次疗程(疗程间氢氧化钙根管封药...目的观察分析感染根管一次性根管治疗的术后反应和短期治愈情况,评价一次性根管治疗的临床可行性。方法临床诊断为牙髓坏死和急、慢性根尖周炎的患牙在一次治疗内完成根管预备和根管充填,共100例,与42例两次疗程(疗程间氢氧化钙根管封药)完成根管治疗的类似患牙进行临床效果比较分析。临床观察的主要指标有患者自评的疼痛率、临床评定的疼痛率、术后6个月 X 线片和临床评定的治愈率。结果患者术后自评疼痛率一次组为60.0%,两次组为57.1%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1周临床评定疼痛率一次组为43.0%,两次组为52.4%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两次疗程的第二次治疗增加了第二次激惹疼痛的机会。术后6个月一次组治愈率为67.9%,两次组为61.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论感染根管一次性根管治疗在术后疼痛和近期治愈翠上与两次疗程相同,但疼痛期较短,具有临床可行性。展开更多
目的探讨iRoot BP Plus结合显微根尖手术治疗难治性根尖周炎的临床疗效。方法对本院2016年1月~2018年12月间收治的60例难治性根尖周炎患者进行研究,按照随机数字表法将其分为实验组与对照组,均行显微根尖手术治疗,实验组30例患者采用iRo...目的探讨iRoot BP Plus结合显微根尖手术治疗难治性根尖周炎的临床疗效。方法对本院2016年1月~2018年12月间收治的60例难治性根尖周炎患者进行研究,按照随机数字表法将其分为实验组与对照组,均行显微根尖手术治疗,实验组30例患者采用iRoot BP Plus倒填充,对照组30例采用银汞合金倒填充,观察两组术后肿痛情况及肿痛率、根尖周指数。结果实验组术后肿痛程度明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组肿痛率为3.3%,对照组为23.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术前O-PAI指数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后6个月、12个月,实验组O-PAI指数均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论难治性根尖周炎采用iRoot BP Plus结合显微根尖手术治疗,减轻了术后肿痛,根尖骨组织恢复良好,值得采用。展开更多
Background:Having the ability to identify potential health risk factors such as lifestyle,ethnicity,health status,and social determinants associated with oral health status risk,health care providers can take an activ...Background:Having the ability to identify potential health risk factors such as lifestyle,ethnicity,health status,and social determinants associated with oral health status risk,health care providers can take an active role in health screening to discover any need for clinical preventive services,including dental preventive services,and can detect health problems.Methods:A descriptive type of cross-sectional study was conducted to explore the practice of common oral diseases among the patients visiting in the selected dental college and hospital in Bangladesh from October 2019 to December 2019.About 100 patients were interviewed through a semi-structured questionnaire,followed by an oral examination through a checklist and a face-to-face interview.A systematically random sampling technique was employed to select the study population.Results:Among them,the(21-30)year age group shows a maximum 20%,whereas the(71-80)year age group represents the minority with only 2%.Among them,56%were male and 44%were female.Students represent the majority of 26%,whereas others(day laborers)represent only 4%.Decayed teeth remained in 72%of cases,teeth were missing in 31%of cases,and filled teeth were present in 24%of cases.A majority of 71%clean teeth once daily,whereas only 29%clean teeth twice daily.Again,only 30%brush teeth at night and a maximum of 95%brush teeth in the morning.Moreover,a maximum of 68%use toothpaste and brushes,while only 4%use meswak for cleaning their teeth.About 4%of cases with no debris,51%of cases with less than 1/3rd of the tooth with debris,32%of cases with 1/3rd-2/3rd of the tooth with debris,and 13%of cases with more than 2/3rd of the tooth with debris were present.Again,about 30%had no calculus,52%less than 1/3rd of tooth,16%in between 1/3rd and 2/3rd of tooth,and 2%more than 2/3rd of the calculus was present.About 47%of mild,22%of moderate,6%of severe and 25%had no inflammation.Furthermore,for treatment purposes,20.69%was advised for scaling,19.66%for filling,16.90%for root canal treatment,17.59%for展开更多
文摘目的观察分析感染根管一次性根管治疗的术后反应和短期治愈情况,评价一次性根管治疗的临床可行性。方法临床诊断为牙髓坏死和急、慢性根尖周炎的患牙在一次治疗内完成根管预备和根管充填,共100例,与42例两次疗程(疗程间氢氧化钙根管封药)完成根管治疗的类似患牙进行临床效果比较分析。临床观察的主要指标有患者自评的疼痛率、临床评定的疼痛率、术后6个月 X 线片和临床评定的治愈率。结果患者术后自评疼痛率一次组为60.0%,两次组为57.1%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1周临床评定疼痛率一次组为43.0%,两次组为52.4%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两次疗程的第二次治疗增加了第二次激惹疼痛的机会。术后6个月一次组治愈率为67.9%,两次组为61.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论感染根管一次性根管治疗在术后疼痛和近期治愈翠上与两次疗程相同,但疼痛期较短,具有临床可行性。
文摘目的探讨iRoot BP Plus结合显微根尖手术治疗难治性根尖周炎的临床疗效。方法对本院2016年1月~2018年12月间收治的60例难治性根尖周炎患者进行研究,按照随机数字表法将其分为实验组与对照组,均行显微根尖手术治疗,实验组30例患者采用iRoot BP Plus倒填充,对照组30例采用银汞合金倒填充,观察两组术后肿痛情况及肿痛率、根尖周指数。结果实验组术后肿痛程度明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组肿痛率为3.3%,对照组为23.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术前O-PAI指数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后6个月、12个月,实验组O-PAI指数均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论难治性根尖周炎采用iRoot BP Plus结合显微根尖手术治疗,减轻了术后肿痛,根尖骨组织恢复良好,值得采用。
文摘Background:Having the ability to identify potential health risk factors such as lifestyle,ethnicity,health status,and social determinants associated with oral health status risk,health care providers can take an active role in health screening to discover any need for clinical preventive services,including dental preventive services,and can detect health problems.Methods:A descriptive type of cross-sectional study was conducted to explore the practice of common oral diseases among the patients visiting in the selected dental college and hospital in Bangladesh from October 2019 to December 2019.About 100 patients were interviewed through a semi-structured questionnaire,followed by an oral examination through a checklist and a face-to-face interview.A systematically random sampling technique was employed to select the study population.Results:Among them,the(21-30)year age group shows a maximum 20%,whereas the(71-80)year age group represents the minority with only 2%.Among them,56%were male and 44%were female.Students represent the majority of 26%,whereas others(day laborers)represent only 4%.Decayed teeth remained in 72%of cases,teeth were missing in 31%of cases,and filled teeth were present in 24%of cases.A majority of 71%clean teeth once daily,whereas only 29%clean teeth twice daily.Again,only 30%brush teeth at night and a maximum of 95%brush teeth in the morning.Moreover,a maximum of 68%use toothpaste and brushes,while only 4%use meswak for cleaning their teeth.About 4%of cases with no debris,51%of cases with less than 1/3rd of the tooth with debris,32%of cases with 1/3rd-2/3rd of the tooth with debris,and 13%of cases with more than 2/3rd of the tooth with debris were present.Again,about 30%had no calculus,52%less than 1/3rd of tooth,16%in between 1/3rd and 2/3rd of tooth,and 2%more than 2/3rd of the calculus was present.About 47%of mild,22%of moderate,6%of severe and 25%had no inflammation.Furthermore,for treatment purposes,20.69%was advised for scaling,19.66%for filling,16.90%for root canal treatment,17.59%for