Femoral neck fractures account for nearly half of all hip fractures with the vast majority occurring in elderly patients after simple falls.Currently there may be sufficient evidence to support the routine use of hip ...Femoral neck fractures account for nearly half of all hip fractures with the vast majority occurring in elderly patients after simple falls.Currently there may be sufficient evidence to support the routine use of hip replacement surgery for low demand elderly patients in all but non-displaced and valgus impacted femoral neck fractures.However for the physiologically young patients,preservation of the natural hip anatomy and mechanics is a priority in management because of their high functional demands.The biomechanical challenges of femoral neck fixation and the vulnerability of the femoral head blood supply lead to a high incidence of non-union and osteonecrosis of the femoral head after internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures.Anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation are essentials in achieving the goals of treatment in this young patient population.Furthermore,other management variables such as surgical timing,the role of capsulotomy and the choice of implant for fixation remaincontroversial.This review will focus both on the demographics and injury profile of the young patient with femoral neck fractures and the current evidence behind the surgical management of these injuries as well as their major secondary complications.展开更多
Background： Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture, especially in elderly Chinese. This study aimed to assess...Background： Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture, especially in elderly Chinese. This study aimed to assess the differences in proximal femoral geometry parameters between patients with femoral neck fractures and patients with intertrochanteric fractures to provide guidance for individualized customized prosthesis and accurate reconstruction of proximal femurs in elderly Chinese patients. Methods： We retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of 198 elderly patients over 65 years of age who were admitted to the orthopedic department with hip fractures between January 2017 and December 2017 in The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University. Age, fracture site, gender, and proximal femoral geometry parameters （.neck shaft angle [NSA], center edge angle [CEA], femoral head diameter [FHD], femoral neck diameter [FND], femoral neck axial length [FNAL], hip axial length [HAL], and femoral shaft diameter [FSD]） were recorded. Student＇s t-test was used to compare the continuous variables, Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and multiple logistic stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors of hip fracture type. Results： Statistically significant differences in NSA （137.63 ± 4.56° vs. 132.07 ± 4.17°, t = 1.598, P 〈 0.001）, CEA （37.62 ± 6.77° vs. 43.11 ±7.09°, t = 5.597, P 〈 0.001 ）, FND （35.21 ± 3.25 mm vs. 34.09 ±3.82 mm, t = 2.233, P = 0.027）, and FNAL （99.30 ± 7.91 mm vs. 103.58± 8.39 ram, t = 3.715, P 〈 0.001 ） were found between the femoral neck fracture group and femoral intertrochanteric fracture group. FHD, FND, FSD, HAL, and FNAL were different between sexes （all P 〈 0.001 ）. The greater NSA was the risk factor for femoral neck fractures （,odds ratio [OR]： 0.70, P 〈 0.001 ）, greater CEA and longer FNAL were risk factors for femoral intertrochanteric fractures （OR： 1.15, 1.17, all P 展开更多
Background：There is conflicting evidence as to whether the femoral head should be preserved or replaced in elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.In this article,we performed a systemati...Background：There is conflicting evidence as to whether the femoral head should be preserved or replaced in elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.In this article,we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the short-and long-term effectiveness of arthroplasty （AR） and internal fixation （IF）.Methods：PubMed,Embase,and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically up to January 2016.All randomized controlled trials directly comparing the effectiveness of AR and IF for displaced intracapsular fracture were retrieved with no limitation on language or publication year.Results：In total,eight prospective randomized studies involving 2206 patients were included.The results of our study showed that patients in the AR group reported significantly lower complication （risk ratio：0.56,95% confidence interval [CI] =0.38-0.80）,re-operation （risk ratio：0.17,95% CI =0.13-0.22）,revision rates （risk ratio：0.11,95% CI：0.08-0.16）,and better function compared with their IF counterparts,and they were less likely to suffer postoperative pain.No statistically significant differences for the rates of mortality,infection,and/or deep vein thrombosis between AR and IF were found.Conclusions：Based on our analysis,we recommend that AR should be used as the primary treatment for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly.However,IF may be appropriate for those who are very frail.展开更多
Background： Nowadays, social media tools such as short message service, Twitter, video, and web-based systems are more and more used in clinical follow-up, making clinical follow-up much more time- and cost-effective...Background： Nowadays, social media tools such as short message service, Twitter, video, and web-based systems are more and more used in clinical follow-up, making clinical follow-up much more time- and cost-effective than ever before. However, as the most popular social media in China, little is known about the utility of smartphone WeChat application in follow-up. In this study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility and superiority of WeChat application in clinical follow-up. Methods： A total of 108 patients diagnosed with head and neck tumor were randomized to WeChat follow-up （WFU） group or telephone follow-up （TFU） group for 6-month follow-up. The follow-ups were delivered by WeChat or telephone at 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months to the patients after being discharged. The study measurements were time consumption for follow-up delivery, total economic cost, lost-to-follow-up rate, and overall satisfaction for the follow-up method. Results： Time consumption in WFU group for each patient （23.36 ± 6.16 min） was significantly shorter than that in TFU group （42.89 ± 7.15 min） （P 〈 0.001 ）; total economic cost in WFU group （RMB 90 Yuan） was much lower than that in TFU group （RMB 196 Yuan）. Lost-to-follow-up rate in the WFU group was 7.02% （4/57） compared with TFU group, 9.80% （5/51 ）, while no significance was observed （95% confidence interval [CI]： 0.176-2.740; P = 0.732）. The overall satisfaction rate in WFU group was 94.34% （50/53） compared with 80.43% （37/46） in TFU group （95% CI： 0.057-0.067; P = 0.034）. Conclusions： The smartphone WeChat application was found to be a viable option for follow-up in discharged patients with head and neck tumors. WFU was time-effective, cost-effective, and convenient in communication. This doctor-led follow-up model has the potential to establish a good physician-patient relationship by enhancing dynamic communications and providing individual health instructions.展开更多
文摘Femoral neck fractures account for nearly half of all hip fractures with the vast majority occurring in elderly patients after simple falls.Currently there may be sufficient evidence to support the routine use of hip replacement surgery for low demand elderly patients in all but non-displaced and valgus impacted femoral neck fractures.However for the physiologically young patients,preservation of the natural hip anatomy and mechanics is a priority in management because of their high functional demands.The biomechanical challenges of femoral neck fixation and the vulnerability of the femoral head blood supply lead to a high incidence of non-union and osteonecrosis of the femoral head after internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures.Anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation are essentials in achieving the goals of treatment in this young patient population.Furthermore,other management variables such as surgical timing,the role of capsulotomy and the choice of implant for fixation remaincontroversial.This review will focus both on the demographics and injury profile of the young patient with femoral neck fractures and the current evidence behind the surgical management of these injuries as well as their major secondary complications.
文摘Background： Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture, especially in elderly Chinese. This study aimed to assess the differences in proximal femoral geometry parameters between patients with femoral neck fractures and patients with intertrochanteric fractures to provide guidance for individualized customized prosthesis and accurate reconstruction of proximal femurs in elderly Chinese patients. Methods： We retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of 198 elderly patients over 65 years of age who were admitted to the orthopedic department with hip fractures between January 2017 and December 2017 in The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University. Age, fracture site, gender, and proximal femoral geometry parameters （.neck shaft angle [NSA], center edge angle [CEA], femoral head diameter [FHD], femoral neck diameter [FND], femoral neck axial length [FNAL], hip axial length [HAL], and femoral shaft diameter [FSD]） were recorded. Student＇s t-test was used to compare the continuous variables, Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and multiple logistic stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors of hip fracture type. Results： Statistically significant differences in NSA （137.63 ± 4.56° vs. 132.07 ± 4.17°, t = 1.598, P 〈 0.001）, CEA （37.62 ± 6.77° vs. 43.11 ±7.09°, t = 5.597, P 〈 0.001 ）, FND （35.21 ± 3.25 mm vs. 34.09 ±3.82 mm, t = 2.233, P = 0.027）, and FNAL （99.30 ± 7.91 mm vs. 103.58± 8.39 ram, t = 3.715, P 〈 0.001 ） were found between the femoral neck fracture group and femoral intertrochanteric fracture group. FHD, FND, FSD, HAL, and FNAL were different between sexes （all P 〈 0.001 ）. The greater NSA was the risk factor for femoral neck fractures （,odds ratio [OR]： 0.70, P 〈 0.001 ）, greater CEA and longer FNAL were risk factors for femoral intertrochanteric fractures （OR： 1.15, 1.17, all P
基金This work was supported by the grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 81572124）.
文摘Background：There is conflicting evidence as to whether the femoral head should be preserved or replaced in elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.In this article,we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the short-and long-term effectiveness of arthroplasty （AR） and internal fixation （IF）.Methods：PubMed,Embase,and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically up to January 2016.All randomized controlled trials directly comparing the effectiveness of AR and IF for displaced intracapsular fracture were retrieved with no limitation on language or publication year.Results：In total,eight prospective randomized studies involving 2206 patients were included.The results of our study showed that patients in the AR group reported significantly lower complication （risk ratio：0.56,95% confidence interval [CI] =0.38-0.80）,re-operation （risk ratio：0.17,95% CI =0.13-0.22）,revision rates （risk ratio：0.11,95% CI：0.08-0.16）,and better function compared with their IF counterparts,and they were less likely to suffer postoperative pain.No statistically significant differences for the rates of mortality,infection,and/or deep vein thrombosis between AR and IF were found.Conclusions：Based on our analysis,we recommend that AR should be used as the primary treatment for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly.However,IF may be appropriate for those who are very frail.
基金This work was partially supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 81072224）.
文摘Background： Nowadays, social media tools such as short message service, Twitter, video, and web-based systems are more and more used in clinical follow-up, making clinical follow-up much more time- and cost-effective than ever before. However, as the most popular social media in China, little is known about the utility of smartphone WeChat application in follow-up. In this study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility and superiority of WeChat application in clinical follow-up. Methods： A total of 108 patients diagnosed with head and neck tumor were randomized to WeChat follow-up （WFU） group or telephone follow-up （TFU） group for 6-month follow-up. The follow-ups were delivered by WeChat or telephone at 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months to the patients after being discharged. The study measurements were time consumption for follow-up delivery, total economic cost, lost-to-follow-up rate, and overall satisfaction for the follow-up method. Results： Time consumption in WFU group for each patient （23.36 ± 6.16 min） was significantly shorter than that in TFU group （42.89 ± 7.15 min） （P 〈 0.001 ）; total economic cost in WFU group （RMB 90 Yuan） was much lower than that in TFU group （RMB 196 Yuan）. Lost-to-follow-up rate in the WFU group was 7.02% （4/57） compared with TFU group, 9.80% （5/51 ）, while no significance was observed （95% confidence interval [CI]： 0.176-2.740; P = 0.732）. The overall satisfaction rate in WFU group was 94.34% （50/53） compared with 80.43% （37/46） in TFU group （95% CI： 0.057-0.067; P = 0.034）. Conclusions： The smartphone WeChat application was found to be a viable option for follow-up in discharged patients with head and neck tumors. WFU was time-effective, cost-effective, and convenient in communication. This doctor-led follow-up model has the potential to establish a good physician-patient relationship by enhancing dynamic communications and providing individual health instructions.
