Postoperative pain is the most common complaint after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was carried out to evaluate whether preoperative administration of intramuscular dezocine can provide postoperative analge...Postoperative pain is the most common complaint after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was carried out to evaluate whether preoperative administration of intramuscular dezocine can provide postoperative analgesia and reduce postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients （ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ ） scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into intramuscular dezocine group （group 1） or intramuscular normal saline group （group 2）. Dezocine and equal volume normal saline were administered intramuscularly 10 rain before the induction of anesthesia. After operation, the severity of postoperative pain, postoperative fentanyl requirement, incidence and severity of side-effects were assessed. Postoperative pain and postoperative patient-controlled fentanyl consumption were reduced significantly in group l compared with group 2. The incidence and severity of side effects were similar between the two groups. Preoperative single-dose administration of intramuscular dezocine 0.1 mg/kg was effective in reducing postoperative pain and postoperative patient-controlled fentanyl requirement in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.展开更多
目的:比较一期腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)联合胆总管探查取石(LCBDE)与分期内镜取石(ERCP)和LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月—2014年6月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行微创治疗的112例胆囊结石合并胆总管结...目的:比较一期腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)联合胆总管探查取石(LCBDE)与分期内镜取石(ERCP)和LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月—2014年6月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行微创治疗的112例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者资料,其中52例行一期LC+LCBDE(LCBDE组),60例行ERCP后24 h或择期行LC(ERCP组),比较两组相关临床指标。结果:除LCBDE组平均年龄小于ERCP组外(42.4岁vs.57.4岁,P<0.05),两组其余一般资料均具有可比性。两组均无死亡病例,手术成功率(94.3%vs.98.4%)、总并发症发生率(8.2%vs.10.1%)、结石残余发生率(2.0%vs.1.7%)等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);ERCP组术后高淀粉酶血症发生率明显高于LCBDE组(16.9%vs.4.1%,P<0.05),但均为单纯性淀粉酶升高;与ERCP组比较,LCBDE组术后住院时间更短(4.9 d vs.6.3 d),总住院费用减少(21 685.9元vs.30 354.3元),但LCBDE组手术时间明显延长(117.1 min vs.97.4 min)(均P<0.05)。结论:一期LC+LCBDE或分期ERCP+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石均安全、有效,可根据患者情况选择应用。展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of twostage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.METHODS:Four databases,including PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Central Register o...AIM:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of twostage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.METHODS:Four databases,including PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Science Citation Index up to September 2011,were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials(RCTs).Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers.The primary outcomes were stone clearance from the common bile duct,postoperative morbidity and mortality.The secondary outcomes were conversion to other procedures,number of procedures per patient,length of hospital stay,total operative time,hospitalization charges,patient acceptance and quality of life scores.RESULTS:Seven eligible RCTs [five trials(n = 621) comparing preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) + laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) with LC + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE);two trials(n = 166) comparing postoperative ERCP/EST + LC with LC + LCBDE],composed of 787 patients in total,were included in the final analysis.The metaanalysis detected no statistically significant difference between the two groups in stone clearance from the common bile duct [risk ratios(RR) =-0.10,95% confidence intervals(CI):-0.24 to 0.04,P = 0.17],postoperative morbidity(RR = 0.79,95% CI:0.58 to 1.10,P = 0.16),mortality(RR = 2.19,95% CI:0.33 to 14.67,P = 0.42),conversion to other procedures(RR = 1.21,95% CI:0.54 to 2.70,P = 0.39),length of hospital stay(MD = 0.99,95% CI:-1.59 to 3.57,P = 0.45),total operative time(MD = 12.14,95% CI:-1.83 to 26.10,P = 0.09).Two-stage(LC + ERCP/EST) management clearly required more procedures per patient than single-stage(LC + LCBDE) management.CONCLUSION:Single-stage management is equivalent to two-stage management but requires fewer procedures.However,patient's condition,operator's expertise and local resources should be taken into account in making treatment decisions.展开更多
目的评价腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMbase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国学术期刊网全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库和万方数据库,...目的评价腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMbase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国学术期刊网全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库和万方数据库,同时辅以其他检索。检索时间均从建库至2014年5月,语种不限。收集所有比较腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的随机对照试验(RCTs)。由两名评价员独立按照纳入标准提取数据并交叉核对,采用Cochrane协作网推荐软件Rev Man 5.2版进行统计分析。结果最终纳入11个RCT,共1039例病人。Meta分析结果显示:与开放无张力组相比,腹腔镜技术在慢性疼痛(OR=0.40,95%CI:0.20~0.82,P=0.01)、切口感染率(OR=0.28,95%CI:0.10~0.81,P=0.02)、术后住院时间(国外:MD=-4.54,95%CI:-5.59^-3.49,P<0.00001;国内:MD=-2.46,95%CI:-2.83^-2.08,P<0.00001)和手术时间(MD=16.74,95%CI:14.69~18.80,P<0.00001)方面差异有统计学意义,而在术后再复发率(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.44~1.20,P=0.22)、急性疼痛(OR=0.74,95%CI:0.14~3.76,P=0.71)、血肿或血清肿(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.48~1.11,P=0.14)与尿潴留(OR=0.97,95%CI:0.46~2.07,P=0.94)方面差异无统计学意义。结论与开放无张力手术相比,腹腔镜手术不可以降低术后再复发率但可以降低术后慢性疼痛与切口感染发生率;可以缩短术后住院时间但手术时间较长。两组在急性疼痛、血肿或血清肿与尿潴留方面的差异均无统计学意义。展开更多
文摘Postoperative pain is the most common complaint after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was carried out to evaluate whether preoperative administration of intramuscular dezocine can provide postoperative analgesia and reduce postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients （ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ ） scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into intramuscular dezocine group （group 1） or intramuscular normal saline group （group 2）. Dezocine and equal volume normal saline were administered intramuscularly 10 rain before the induction of anesthesia. After operation, the severity of postoperative pain, postoperative fentanyl requirement, incidence and severity of side-effects were assessed. Postoperative pain and postoperative patient-controlled fentanyl consumption were reduced significantly in group l compared with group 2. The incidence and severity of side effects were similar between the two groups. Preoperative single-dose administration of intramuscular dezocine 0.1 mg/kg was effective in reducing postoperative pain and postoperative patient-controlled fentanyl requirement in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
文摘目的:比较一期腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)联合胆总管探查取石(LCBDE)与分期内镜取石(ERCP)和LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月—2014年6月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行微创治疗的112例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者资料,其中52例行一期LC+LCBDE(LCBDE组),60例行ERCP后24 h或择期行LC(ERCP组),比较两组相关临床指标。结果:除LCBDE组平均年龄小于ERCP组外(42.4岁vs.57.4岁,P<0.05),两组其余一般资料均具有可比性。两组均无死亡病例,手术成功率(94.3%vs.98.4%)、总并发症发生率(8.2%vs.10.1%)、结石残余发生率(2.0%vs.1.7%)等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);ERCP组术后高淀粉酶血症发生率明显高于LCBDE组(16.9%vs.4.1%,P<0.05),但均为单纯性淀粉酶升高;与ERCP组比较,LCBDE组术后住院时间更短(4.9 d vs.6.3 d),总住院费用减少(21 685.9元vs.30 354.3元),但LCBDE组手术时间明显延长(117.1 min vs.97.4 min)(均P<0.05)。结论:一期LC+LCBDE或分期ERCP+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石均安全、有效,可根据患者情况选择应用。
文摘AIM:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of twostage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.METHODS:Four databases,including PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Science Citation Index up to September 2011,were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials(RCTs).Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers.The primary outcomes were stone clearance from the common bile duct,postoperative morbidity and mortality.The secondary outcomes were conversion to other procedures,number of procedures per patient,length of hospital stay,total operative time,hospitalization charges,patient acceptance and quality of life scores.RESULTS:Seven eligible RCTs [five trials(n = 621) comparing preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) + laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) with LC + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE);two trials(n = 166) comparing postoperative ERCP/EST + LC with LC + LCBDE],composed of 787 patients in total,were included in the final analysis.The metaanalysis detected no statistically significant difference between the two groups in stone clearance from the common bile duct [risk ratios(RR) =-0.10,95% confidence intervals(CI):-0.24 to 0.04,P = 0.17],postoperative morbidity(RR = 0.79,95% CI:0.58 to 1.10,P = 0.16),mortality(RR = 2.19,95% CI:0.33 to 14.67,P = 0.42),conversion to other procedures(RR = 1.21,95% CI:0.54 to 2.70,P = 0.39),length of hospital stay(MD = 0.99,95% CI:-1.59 to 3.57,P = 0.45),total operative time(MD = 12.14,95% CI:-1.83 to 26.10,P = 0.09).Two-stage(LC + ERCP/EST) management clearly required more procedures per patient than single-stage(LC + LCBDE) management.CONCLUSION:Single-stage management is equivalent to two-stage management but requires fewer procedures.However,patient's condition,operator's expertise and local resources should be taken into account in making treatment decisions.
文摘目的评价腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMbase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国学术期刊网全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库和万方数据库,同时辅以其他检索。检索时间均从建库至2014年5月,语种不限。收集所有比较腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的随机对照试验(RCTs)。由两名评价员独立按照纳入标准提取数据并交叉核对,采用Cochrane协作网推荐软件Rev Man 5.2版进行统计分析。结果最终纳入11个RCT,共1039例病人。Meta分析结果显示:与开放无张力组相比,腹腔镜技术在慢性疼痛(OR=0.40,95%CI:0.20~0.82,P=0.01)、切口感染率(OR=0.28,95%CI:0.10~0.81,P=0.02)、术后住院时间(国外:MD=-4.54,95%CI:-5.59^-3.49,P<0.00001;国内:MD=-2.46,95%CI:-2.83^-2.08,P<0.00001)和手术时间(MD=16.74,95%CI:14.69~18.80,P<0.00001)方面差异有统计学意义,而在术后再复发率(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.44~1.20,P=0.22)、急性疼痛(OR=0.74,95%CI:0.14~3.76,P=0.71)、血肿或血清肿(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.48~1.11,P=0.14)与尿潴留(OR=0.97,95%CI:0.46~2.07,P=0.94)方面差异无统计学意义。结论与开放无张力手术相比,腹腔镜手术不可以降低术后再复发率但可以降低术后慢性疼痛与切口感染发生率;可以缩短术后住院时间但手术时间较长。两组在急性疼痛、血肿或血清肿与尿潴留方面的差异均无统计学意义。
