Background The number of highly sensitized patients is rising, and sensitization can lead to renal transplant failure. The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of protein A immunoadsorption combi...Background The number of highly sensitized patients is rising, and sensitization can lead to renal transplant failure. The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of protein A immunoadsorption combined with rituximab （RTX） in highly sensitized recipients of kidney transplants.Methods Seven highly sensitized recipients of living-related renal transplants （4 men and 3 women, mean aged 42.5 years old （range 33-51）） were pretreated with this combination. Human leukocyte antigen （HLA） mismatch number was 2-5. Panel reactive antibody （PRA） of class Ⅰwas high in 2 cases and that of class Ⅱwas high in 1 case. All patients were pretreated with immunoadsorption 2-10 times. Immunoglobulin and PRA changes were monitored before and after absorption. The operation was conducted when PRA or immunoglobulin levels were at or below normal levels. Immunosuppressive drugs were provided 3-5 days before the operation, and one dose of RTX （375 mg/m^2） was infused with polyclonal antibody on the day of operation. Postoperative creatinine （Cr）, creatinine clearance rate （Ccr）, PRA ratio, and immunoglobulin changes were monitored.Results All 7 patients had good recovery without delayed graft function. Acute rejection occurred in 3 cases at postoperative days 8, 10, and 14, respectively. The Banff 07 biopsy grades were la in 1 case and lla C4d0 in 2 cases. Successful reversion was achieved after giving methylprednisolone or antithymocyte immunoglobulin ＋ cyclophosphamide. All patients were discharged with normal renal function, mean class Ⅰ PRA was 14% and mean class ⅡPRA was 35%. PRA was completely negative in 3 cases. Conclusion Protein A immunoadsorption combined with RTX can safely reduce the occurrence of humoral rejection in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients.展开更多
The new kidney allocation scheme(KAS) in effect since December 4th 2014 was designed to overcome the shortcomings of previous system. A key feature of the new KAS is preferential allocation of best quality organs to w...The new kidney allocation scheme(KAS) in effect since December 4th 2014 was designed to overcome the shortcomings of previous system. A key feature of the new KAS is preferential allocation of best quality organs to wait-list candidates with the longest predictivesurvival in a concept called longevity matching. Highly sensitized recipients would get extra points and enjoy widespread sharing of organs in order to increase accessibility to transplant. Wait-list candidates with blood group B will be offered organs from donors with A2 and A2 B blood type in order to shorten their wait-list time. Time on the wait list will start from day of listing or date of initiation of dialysis whichever comes first which should benefit candidates with limited resources who might be late to get on the transplant list. Pay back system has been eliminated in the new KAS. These changes in organ allocation policy may lead to increase in median half-life of the allograft and increase the number of transplants; thus resulting in better utilization of a scarce resource. There could be unintended negative consequences which may become evident over time.展开更多
Background The number of highly sensitized patients is rising, The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of rituximab in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. and sensitization can lead ...Background The number of highly sensitized patients is rising, The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of rituximab in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. and sensitization can lead to renal transplant failure. renal transplantation following induction therapy with Methods Seven highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients who underwent rituximab therapy from December 2008 to December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 3 men and 4 women, with a mean age of 38.5 years （range, 21-47 years）. The duration of hemodialysis was 3-12 months, with a mean duration of 11 months. For 4 patients, this was the second transplant; the previous graft survival time was 2-11 years, with a mean survival time of 5.8 years. All the female recipients had history of multiple pregnancies, and all patients had previously received blood transfusions. All donors were men, with a mean age of 32.5 years （range, 25-37 years）. In 2 of the 7 patients, both class I and class II of panel reactive antibody were high; the remaining 5 patients showed either high in class I or in class II of panel reactive antibody. The mean panel reactive antibody value was 31% for class I and 51% for class II respectively. The donors and the recipients had the same blood type, with low lymphocyte cytotoxicity ranging from 2% to 5%. The human leukocyte antigen （HLA） mismatch numbers were from 2 to 4. All patients received tacrolimus （0.1 mg.kg^-1 .d^-1） and mycophenolate mofetil （750 mg twice per day） orally 3 days prior to surgery. All patients received a single dose of 600 mg rituximab （375 mg/m^2） infusion on the day before surgery and polyclonal antibody （antithymocyte globulin） on the day of surgery. Postoperative creatinine, creatinine clearance rate, and occurrence of rejection by pathological biopsy confirmation were monitored. Results No patient had delayed graft function after surgery. Two patients had acute rejection, one on day 7 and the other on day 13 post-surgery. Diagnosis of展开更多
文摘Background The number of highly sensitized patients is rising, and sensitization can lead to renal transplant failure. The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of protein A immunoadsorption combined with rituximab （RTX） in highly sensitized recipients of kidney transplants.Methods Seven highly sensitized recipients of living-related renal transplants （4 men and 3 women, mean aged 42.5 years old （range 33-51）） were pretreated with this combination. Human leukocyte antigen （HLA） mismatch number was 2-5. Panel reactive antibody （PRA） of class Ⅰwas high in 2 cases and that of class Ⅱwas high in 1 case. All patients were pretreated with immunoadsorption 2-10 times. Immunoglobulin and PRA changes were monitored before and after absorption. The operation was conducted when PRA or immunoglobulin levels were at or below normal levels. Immunosuppressive drugs were provided 3-5 days before the operation, and one dose of RTX （375 mg/m^2） was infused with polyclonal antibody on the day of operation. Postoperative creatinine （Cr）, creatinine clearance rate （Ccr）, PRA ratio, and immunoglobulin changes were monitored.Results All 7 patients had good recovery without delayed graft function. Acute rejection occurred in 3 cases at postoperative days 8, 10, and 14, respectively. The Banff 07 biopsy grades were la in 1 case and lla C4d0 in 2 cases. Successful reversion was achieved after giving methylprednisolone or antithymocyte immunoglobulin ＋ cyclophosphamide. All patients were discharged with normal renal function, mean class Ⅰ PRA was 14% and mean class ⅡPRA was 35%. PRA was completely negative in 3 cases. Conclusion Protein A immunoadsorption combined with RTX can safely reduce the occurrence of humoral rejection in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients.
文摘The new kidney allocation scheme(KAS) in effect since December 4th 2014 was designed to overcome the shortcomings of previous system. A key feature of the new KAS is preferential allocation of best quality organs to wait-list candidates with the longest predictivesurvival in a concept called longevity matching. Highly sensitized recipients would get extra points and enjoy widespread sharing of organs in order to increase accessibility to transplant. Wait-list candidates with blood group B will be offered organs from donors with A2 and A2 B blood type in order to shorten their wait-list time. Time on the wait list will start from day of listing or date of initiation of dialysis whichever comes first which should benefit candidates with limited resources who might be late to get on the transplant list. Pay back system has been eliminated in the new KAS. These changes in organ allocation policy may lead to increase in median half-life of the allograft and increase the number of transplants; thus resulting in better utilization of a scarce resource. There could be unintended negative consequences which may become evident over time.
文摘Background The number of highly sensitized patients is rising, The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of rituximab in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. and sensitization can lead to renal transplant failure. renal transplantation following induction therapy with Methods Seven highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients who underwent rituximab therapy from December 2008 to December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 3 men and 4 women, with a mean age of 38.5 years （range, 21-47 years）. The duration of hemodialysis was 3-12 months, with a mean duration of 11 months. For 4 patients, this was the second transplant; the previous graft survival time was 2-11 years, with a mean survival time of 5.8 years. All the female recipients had history of multiple pregnancies, and all patients had previously received blood transfusions. All donors were men, with a mean age of 32.5 years （range, 25-37 years）. In 2 of the 7 patients, both class I and class II of panel reactive antibody were high; the remaining 5 patients showed either high in class I or in class II of panel reactive antibody. The mean panel reactive antibody value was 31% for class I and 51% for class II respectively. The donors and the recipients had the same blood type, with low lymphocyte cytotoxicity ranging from 2% to 5%. The human leukocyte antigen （HLA） mismatch numbers were from 2 to 4. All patients received tacrolimus （0.1 mg.kg^-1 .d^-1） and mycophenolate mofetil （750 mg twice per day） orally 3 days prior to surgery. All patients received a single dose of 600 mg rituximab （375 mg/m^2） infusion on the day before surgery and polyclonal antibody （antithymocyte globulin） on the day of surgery. Postoperative creatinine, creatinine clearance rate, and occurrence of rejection by pathological biopsy confirmation were monitored. Results No patient had delayed graft function after surgery. Two patients had acute rejection, one on day 7 and the other on day 13 post-surgery. Diagnosis of
