目的分析胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的食管酸反流严重程度与食管动力、食管黏膜损伤以及胃食管交界区(GEJ)形态解剖学之间的关系及其意义.方法回顾分析2016年1月至2019年1月于火箭军特色医学中心胃食管外科同期行食管24 h pH-阻抗监测、胃...目的分析胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的食管酸反流严重程度与食管动力、食管黏膜损伤以及胃食管交界区(GEJ)形态解剖学之间的关系及其意义.方法回顾分析2016年1月至2019年1月于火箭军特色医学中心胃食管外科同期行食管24 h pH-阻抗监测、胃镜和高分辨率测压(HRM)的GERD患者的临床资料,按DeMeester积分分为非病理性酸反流组、轻度病理性酸反流组和中重度病理性酸反流组,各组性别和年龄进行配对,每组均为60例.统计分析各组的上食管括约肌(UES)压力、下食管括约肌(LES)压力、LES长度、腹段LES长度、无效吞咽百分比、食管炎、GEJ的Hill分级和食管裂孔疝(HH)等参数的差异,并进行两两比较和相关性分析.结果各组男女比例均为33:27,年龄均为(57±13)岁,非参数检验分析显示LES压力及腹腔LES长度随酸反流的严重程度的升高而减小(P=0.033,P=0.015),测压HH的检出率随之显著增加(χ^2=0.001);食管炎评分随酸反流的严重程度的升高而升高(P<0.001),食管炎的检出率随之显著增加(χ^2<0.001);GEJ的Hill分级评分随酸反流严重程度的升高而升高(P<0.001),胃镜HH的检出率随之显著增加(χ^2<0.001).DeMeester积分与LES压力、腹段LES长度、无效吞咽百分比、食管炎评分、以及Hill分级评分的相关性均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论GEJ区域食管低动力状态(如LES压力过低)和解剖学异常(腹段食管缩短、GEJ松弛乃至HH形成)与酸反流的严重程度显著相关,这些异常可能是造成酸反流加重的重要原因;另外,酸反流的加重亦可增加食管炎的发生率和严重程度.展开更多
目的总结分析高分辨率食管测压联合食管24 h pH监测在外科诊断及治疗胃食管反流病中的应用价值。方法选取新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院2014年1月至12月期间收治的70例有胃食管反流病症状经临床检查拟诊为胃食管反流病的患者,行高分辨率食...目的总结分析高分辨率食管测压联合食管24 h pH监测在外科诊断及治疗胃食管反流病中的应用价值。方法选取新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院2014年1月至12月期间收治的70例有胃食管反流病症状经临床检查拟诊为胃食管反流病的患者,行高分辨率食管测压、食管24 h pH监测。结果 70例患者中,确诊为胃食管反流病患者50例(71.4%),其中经高分辨率食管测压诊断有食管裂孔疝者32例(64%),无食管裂孔疝者18例(36%)。非胃食管反流病患者20例(28.6%),其中经高分辨率食管测压诊断有食管裂孔疝者4例(20%),无食管裂孔疝者16例(80%)。结论胃食管反流病患者中合并食管裂孔疝者居多,高分辨率食管测压与食管24 h pH监测对胃食管反流病患者的诊断和外科治疗术式的选择具有指导意义。展开更多
AIM To compare the outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication(LNF)and proton pump inhibitors(PPIs)therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR)and typeⅠhiatal hernia diagnosed by oropharyngeal p H-m...AIM To compare the outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication(LNF)and proton pump inhibitors(PPIs)therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR)and typeⅠhiatal hernia diagnosed by oropharyngeal p H-monitoring and symptom-scale assessment.METHODS From February 2014 to January 2015,70 patients who were diagnosed with LPR and type I hiatal hernia and referred for symptomatic assessment,oropharyngeal p H-monitoring,manometry,and gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled in this study.All of the patients met the inclusion criteria.All of the patients underwent LNF or PPIs administration,and completed a2-year follow-up.Patients’baseline characteristics and primary outcome measures,including comprehensive and single symptoms of LPR,PPIs independence,and satisfaction,and postoperative complications were assessed.The outcomes of LNF and PPIs therapy were analyzed and compared. RESULTS There were 31 patients in the LNF group and 39patients in the PPI group.Fifty-three patients(25 in the LNF group and 28 in the PPI group)completed reviews and follow-up.Oropharyngeal p H-monitoring parameters were all abnormal with high acid exposure,a large amount of reflux,and a high Ryan score,associated reflux symptom index(RSI)score.There was a significant improvement in the RSI and LPR symptom scores after the 2-year follow-up in both groups(P<0.05),as well as typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Improvement in the RSI(P<0.005)and symptom scores of cough(P=0.032),mucus(P=0.011),and throat clearing(P=0.022)was significantly superior in the LNF group to that in the PPI group.After LNF and PPIs therapy,13 and 53 patients achieved independence from PPIs therapy(LNF:44.0%vs PPI:7.14%,P<0.001)during follow-up,respectively.Patients in the LNF group were more satisfied with their quality of life than those in the PPI group(LNF:62.49±28.68 vs PPI:44.36±32.77,P=0.004).Body mass index was significantly lower in the LNF group than in the PPI group(LNF:22.2±3.1kg/m^2 vs PPI:25.1±2.9 kg/m^2,P=0.001).CONCLUSION 展开更多
AIM To compare the features ofgastroesophageal reflux disease between elderlyand younger patients.METHODS Twenty-four hour pH-monitoring andendoscopy were P6rformed for the 66 elderlypatients with typical gastroesopha...AIM To compare the features ofgastroesophageal reflux disease between elderlyand younger patients.METHODS Twenty-four hour pH-monitoring andendoscopy were P6rformed for the 66 elderlypatients with typical gastroesophageaI refluxsymptoms, and the results were compared with112 symptomatic younger patients.RESULTS The results of 24-h pH-monitoringand endoscopy showed that the elderly patientshad pathological reflux and reflux esophagitismore frequently than the younger patients.P6rcentage time with pH< 4 in elderly patientswith reflux esophagitis was 32.5% in 24 hours,as compared with 12.9% in the younger patientswith reflux esophagitis (P < 0 .05 ). The elderlypatients with reflux esophagitis have longerP6riOds of acid reflux in both upright and Supinepositions than the younger patients. Endoscopyshowed that 20 .8% of elderIy patients had grade Ⅲ / Ⅳ esophagitis, whereas only 3.4% ofyounger patients had grade Ⅲ/ Ⅳ esophagitis(P < 0.002 ). Percentages of grades Ⅰ /Ⅱesophagitis in the two groups were 12.5% and26. 5%, respectiveIy (P< 0. 002 ).CONCLUSION Elderly patients, as comparedwith younger patients, have more severegastroesophageal reflux and esophageal lesions.The incompetence of lower esophageal sphincter and the presence of hiataI hernia may beimportant factors leading to the difference in incidence and severity of reflux esophagitisbetween elderly and younger patients.展开更多
文摘目的分析胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的食管酸反流严重程度与食管动力、食管黏膜损伤以及胃食管交界区(GEJ)形态解剖学之间的关系及其意义.方法回顾分析2016年1月至2019年1月于火箭军特色医学中心胃食管外科同期行食管24 h pH-阻抗监测、胃镜和高分辨率测压(HRM)的GERD患者的临床资料,按DeMeester积分分为非病理性酸反流组、轻度病理性酸反流组和中重度病理性酸反流组,各组性别和年龄进行配对,每组均为60例.统计分析各组的上食管括约肌(UES)压力、下食管括约肌(LES)压力、LES长度、腹段LES长度、无效吞咽百分比、食管炎、GEJ的Hill分级和食管裂孔疝(HH)等参数的差异,并进行两两比较和相关性分析.结果各组男女比例均为33:27,年龄均为(57±13)岁,非参数检验分析显示LES压力及腹腔LES长度随酸反流的严重程度的升高而减小(P=0.033,P=0.015),测压HH的检出率随之显著增加(χ^2=0.001);食管炎评分随酸反流的严重程度的升高而升高(P<0.001),食管炎的检出率随之显著增加(χ^2<0.001);GEJ的Hill分级评分随酸反流严重程度的升高而升高(P<0.001),胃镜HH的检出率随之显著增加(χ^2<0.001).DeMeester积分与LES压力、腹段LES长度、无效吞咽百分比、食管炎评分、以及Hill分级评分的相关性均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论GEJ区域食管低动力状态(如LES压力过低)和解剖学异常(腹段食管缩短、GEJ松弛乃至HH形成)与酸反流的严重程度显著相关,这些异常可能是造成酸反流加重的重要原因;另外,酸反流的加重亦可增加食管炎的发生率和严重程度.
文摘目的总结分析高分辨率食管测压联合食管24 h pH监测在外科诊断及治疗胃食管反流病中的应用价值。方法选取新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院2014年1月至12月期间收治的70例有胃食管反流病症状经临床检查拟诊为胃食管反流病的患者,行高分辨率食管测压、食管24 h pH监测。结果 70例患者中,确诊为胃食管反流病患者50例(71.4%),其中经高分辨率食管测压诊断有食管裂孔疝者32例(64%),无食管裂孔疝者18例(36%)。非胃食管反流病患者20例(28.6%),其中经高分辨率食管测压诊断有食管裂孔疝者4例(20%),无食管裂孔疝者16例(80%)。结论胃食管反流病患者中合并食管裂孔疝者居多,高分辨率食管测压与食管24 h pH监测对胃食管反流病患者的诊断和外科治疗术式的选择具有指导意义。
文摘AIM To compare the outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication(LNF)and proton pump inhibitors(PPIs)therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR)and typeⅠhiatal hernia diagnosed by oropharyngeal p H-monitoring and symptom-scale assessment.METHODS From February 2014 to January 2015,70 patients who were diagnosed with LPR and type I hiatal hernia and referred for symptomatic assessment,oropharyngeal p H-monitoring,manometry,and gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled in this study.All of the patients met the inclusion criteria.All of the patients underwent LNF or PPIs administration,and completed a2-year follow-up.Patients’baseline characteristics and primary outcome measures,including comprehensive and single symptoms of LPR,PPIs independence,and satisfaction,and postoperative complications were assessed.The outcomes of LNF and PPIs therapy were analyzed and compared. RESULTS There were 31 patients in the LNF group and 39patients in the PPI group.Fifty-three patients(25 in the LNF group and 28 in the PPI group)completed reviews and follow-up.Oropharyngeal p H-monitoring parameters were all abnormal with high acid exposure,a large amount of reflux,and a high Ryan score,associated reflux symptom index(RSI)score.There was a significant improvement in the RSI and LPR symptom scores after the 2-year follow-up in both groups(P<0.05),as well as typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Improvement in the RSI(P<0.005)and symptom scores of cough(P=0.032),mucus(P=0.011),and throat clearing(P=0.022)was significantly superior in the LNF group to that in the PPI group.After LNF and PPIs therapy,13 and 53 patients achieved independence from PPIs therapy(LNF:44.0%vs PPI:7.14%,P<0.001)during follow-up,respectively.Patients in the LNF group were more satisfied with their quality of life than those in the PPI group(LNF:62.49±28.68 vs PPI:44.36±32.77,P=0.004).Body mass index was significantly lower in the LNF group than in the PPI group(LNF:22.2±3.1kg/m^2 vs PPI:25.1±2.9 kg/m^2,P=0.001).CONCLUSION
文摘AIM To compare the features ofgastroesophageal reflux disease between elderlyand younger patients.METHODS Twenty-four hour pH-monitoring andendoscopy were P6rformed for the 66 elderlypatients with typical gastroesophageaI refluxsymptoms, and the results were compared with112 symptomatic younger patients.RESULTS The results of 24-h pH-monitoringand endoscopy showed that the elderly patientshad pathological reflux and reflux esophagitismore frequently than the younger patients.P6rcentage time with pH< 4 in elderly patientswith reflux esophagitis was 32.5% in 24 hours,as compared with 12.9% in the younger patientswith reflux esophagitis (P < 0 .05 ). The elderlypatients with reflux esophagitis have longerP6riOds of acid reflux in both upright and Supinepositions than the younger patients. Endoscopyshowed that 20 .8% of elderIy patients had grade Ⅲ / Ⅳ esophagitis, whereas only 3.4% ofyounger patients had grade Ⅲ/ Ⅳ esophagitis(P < 0.002 ). Percentages of grades Ⅰ /Ⅱesophagitis in the two groups were 12.5% and26. 5%, respectiveIy (P< 0. 002 ).CONCLUSION Elderly patients, as comparedwith younger patients, have more severegastroesophageal reflux and esophageal lesions.The incompetence of lower esophageal sphincter and the presence of hiataI hernia may beimportant factors leading to the difference in incidence and severity of reflux esophagitisbetween elderly and younger patients.
