森林是陆地最大也是最重要的生态系统,森林生态系统提供了木材供给、固碳、水源涵养等多种类型的服务,通过量化森林生态系统服务有利于决策者管理实现精准管理的目标,从而达到提高森林质量和缓解气候变化的作用。森林生态系统过程的复...森林是陆地最大也是最重要的生态系统,森林生态系统提供了木材供给、固碳、水源涵养等多种类型的服务,通过量化森林生态系统服务有利于决策者管理实现精准管理的目标,从而达到提高森林质量和缓解气候变化的作用。森林生态系统过程的复杂性和时空变异性为该领域的研究提供了丰富的研究内容,近几年来该领域的文献发表量增长迅速,为了了解当前森林生态系统服务价值评估研究进展情况,文章使用文献计量学分析法对国内外相关研究进展进行了分析总结。结果显示,中国在该领域研究的国际影响力逐年提升,在Web of Science数据库中,中国科学院在该领域具有最多的文献量;生态系统服务制图、文化服务、生态系统价值、森林景观资源恢复等九类是当前该领域研究的主要研究类别;国内外研究热点大体一致,主要可分为影响因素、评价类型、评价对象、评价方法与指标4个热点类型。文章基于文献聚类和热点分布,提出未来研究的发展方向主要是:气候变化和土地利用变化的影响;多类型的覆盖;方法优化与模型的开发与应用。展开更多
As a Nature-Based Solution,urban forests deliver a number of environmental ecosystem services(EESs).To quantify these EESs,well-defined,reliable,quantifiable and stable indicators are needed.With literature analysis a...As a Nature-Based Solution,urban forests deliver a number of environmental ecosystem services(EESs).To quantify these EESs,well-defined,reliable,quantifiable and stable indicators are needed.With literature analysis and expert knowledge gathered within COST Action FP1204 GreenInUrbs,we proposed a classification of urban forest EESs into three categories:(A)regulation of air,water,soil and climate;(B)provisioning of habitat quality;and(C)provisioning of other goods and services.Each category is divided into EES types:(a)amelioration of air quality;restoration of soil and water;amelioration of the microclimate;removal of CO2 from the air;(b)provision of habitat for biodiversity;support for resilient urban ecosystems;provision of genetic diversity;and(c)provision of energy and nutrients;provision of grey infrastructure resilience.Each EES type provides one or more benefits.For each of these 12 benefits,we propose a set of indicators to be used when analyzing the impacts on the identified EESs.Around half of the 36 indicators are relevant to more than one single benefit,which highlights complex interrelationships.The indicators of wider applicability are tree and stand characteristics,followed by leaf physical traits and tree species composition.This knowledge is needed for the optimization of the EESs delivered by urban forests,now and in the future.展开更多
Background：Forests contribute to human wellbeing through the provision of important ecosystem services.Methods：In this study,we investigated how the perceived importance of ecosystem services may impact the overall ...Background：Forests contribute to human wellbeing through the provision of important ecosystem services.Methods：In this study,we investigated how the perceived importance of ecosystem services may impact the overall benefit provided by managed watersheds at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest over a 45-year period,using standardized measures of service capacity weighted by service importance weights derived from a survey of beneficiaries.Results：The capacity of watersheds to regulate water flow and quality was high in all watersheds throughout the study period,whereas cultural services such as scenic beauty declined after harvest.Impacts on greenhouse gas regulation depended on the efficiency with which harvested biomass was used.Surveys revealed that stakeholders placed high value on all ecosystem services,with regulating and cultural services seen as more important than provisioning services.When service metrics were weighted by survey responses and aggregated into a single measure,total service provision followed the same overall trend as greenhouse gas regulation.Where biomass use was less efficient in terms of greenhouse gas emissions,harvesting resulted in an overall ＂ecosystem service debt＂;where use was more efficient,this ＂ecosystem service debt＂ was reduced.Beneficiaries＇ educational backgrounds significantly affected overall assessment of service provision.Beneficiaries with college or university degrees incurred smaller ＂ecosystem service debts＂ and were less negatively affected by harvesting overall.Conclusions：This study highlights the importance of including empirical measures of beneficiary preference when attempting to quantify overall provision of ecosystem services to human beneficiaries over time.展开更多
文摘森林是陆地最大也是最重要的生态系统,森林生态系统提供了木材供给、固碳、水源涵养等多种类型的服务,通过量化森林生态系统服务有利于决策者管理实现精准管理的目标,从而达到提高森林质量和缓解气候变化的作用。森林生态系统过程的复杂性和时空变异性为该领域的研究提供了丰富的研究内容,近几年来该领域的文献发表量增长迅速,为了了解当前森林生态系统服务价值评估研究进展情况,文章使用文献计量学分析法对国内外相关研究进展进行了分析总结。结果显示,中国在该领域研究的国际影响力逐年提升,在Web of Science数据库中,中国科学院在该领域具有最多的文献量;生态系统服务制图、文化服务、生态系统价值、森林景观资源恢复等九类是当前该领域研究的主要研究类别;国内外研究热点大体一致,主要可分为影响因素、评价类型、评价对象、评价方法与指标4个热点类型。文章基于文献聚类和热点分布,提出未来研究的发展方向主要是:气候变化和土地利用变化的影响;多类型的覆盖;方法优化与模型的开发与应用。
基金financially supported by COST Action FP1204 GreenInUrbsPRIN project EUFORICCMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation(the Agreement No.02.A03.21.0008)
文摘As a Nature-Based Solution,urban forests deliver a number of environmental ecosystem services(EESs).To quantify these EESs,well-defined,reliable,quantifiable and stable indicators are needed.With literature analysis and expert knowledge gathered within COST Action FP1204 GreenInUrbs,we proposed a classification of urban forest EESs into three categories:(A)regulation of air,water,soil and climate;(B)provisioning of habitat quality;and(C)provisioning of other goods and services.Each category is divided into EES types:(a)amelioration of air quality;restoration of soil and water;amelioration of the microclimate;removal of CO2 from the air;(b)provision of habitat for biodiversity;support for resilient urban ecosystems;provision of genetic diversity;and(c)provision of energy and nutrients;provision of grey infrastructure resilience.Each EES type provides one or more benefits.For each of these 12 benefits,we propose a set of indicators to be used when analyzing the impacts on the identified EESs.Around half of the 36 indicators are relevant to more than one single benefit,which highlights complex interrelationships.The indicators of wider applicability are tree and stand characteristics,followed by leaf physical traits and tree species composition.This knowledge is needed for the optimization of the EESs delivered by urban forests,now and in the future.
基金support from the USDA Forest Service's Northeastern States Research Cooperative(NSRC)in collaboration with the Hubbard Brook Research Foundationthe Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
文摘Background：Forests contribute to human wellbeing through the provision of important ecosystem services.Methods：In this study,we investigated how the perceived importance of ecosystem services may impact the overall benefit provided by managed watersheds at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest over a 45-year period,using standardized measures of service capacity weighted by service importance weights derived from a survey of beneficiaries.Results：The capacity of watersheds to regulate water flow and quality was high in all watersheds throughout the study period,whereas cultural services such as scenic beauty declined after harvest.Impacts on greenhouse gas regulation depended on the efficiency with which harvested biomass was used.Surveys revealed that stakeholders placed high value on all ecosystem services,with regulating and cultural services seen as more important than provisioning services.When service metrics were weighted by survey responses and aggregated into a single measure,total service provision followed the same overall trend as greenhouse gas regulation.Where biomass use was less efficient in terms of greenhouse gas emissions,harvesting resulted in an overall ＂ecosystem service debt＂;where use was more efficient,this ＂ecosystem service debt＂ was reduced.Beneficiaries＇ educational backgrounds significantly affected overall assessment of service provision.Beneficiaries with college or university degrees incurred smaller ＂ecosystem service debts＂ and were less negatively affected by harvesting overall.Conclusions：This study highlights the importance of including empirical measures of beneficiary preference when attempting to quantify overall provision of ecosystem services to human beneficiaries over time.
