Background：A good postoperative alignment in total knee arthroplasty （TKA） is the key to achieving satisfactory results.We assessed the effect of femoral and tibial resection on the overall alignment after conventi...Background：A good postoperative alignment in total knee arthroplasty （TKA） is the key to achieving satisfactory results.We assessed the effect of femoral and tibial resection on the overall alignment after conventional TKA.Methods：We conducted a retrospective analysis of 212 primary TKAs in 188 patients.Intramedullary （IM）-guided resection was applied on the femoral side while extramedullary （EM）-guided resection was used on the tibial side.Using full-length X-ray,the preoperative femoral valgus angle and lower extremity alignment,as well as 2-week postoperative femoral and tibial prosthetic coronal alignment and overall lower extremity alignment,were measured.Results：Postoperatively,good prosthetic alignment was achieved in 191 cases （90.1%） on the tibial side and in 144 cases （67.9%） on the femoral side （χ^2 =5.441,P =0.02）.Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the effect of different alignment sides on the overall alignment in the coronal plane.Data were divided into five subgroups based on the valgus or varus status of the prostheses.The standardized regression coefficients of the femoral and tibial prosthetic alignment on the overall alignment were 0.666 and 0.414,respectively;in varus on both sides were 0.658 and 0.377,respectively;in valgus,0.555 and 0.030;femoral side varus and tibial side valgus,0.702 and 0.211;femoral side valgus and tibial side varus,-0.416 and 0.287.The study showed that the overall low extremity alignment was statistically influenced by the prosthetic alignment,except for the tibial prosthetic alignment when femoral prosthesis was in valgus （P =0.153）.Conclusions：In conventional TKA,tibial side EM-guided resection may offer satisfactory postoperative alignment,and femoral resection relying on IM guide may lead to more undesirable results.Postoperative coronal alignment is mainly affected by the femoral resection.Therefore,femoral side operation should receive adequate attention from the surgeons.展开更多
Background: Sagittal plane placement of the tibial component in total knee replacement (TKR) has important implications for maximizing the range of flexion motion, allowing collateral ligaments to function more normal...Background: Sagittal plane placement of the tibial component in total knee replacement (TKR) has important implications for maximizing the range of flexion motion, allowing collateral ligaments to function more normally, as well as providing ideal compressive loading on the tibial bone-prosthesis interface. This study attempts to quantify the normal posterior tibial slope (PTS) angle pre-operatively and post-operatively in osteoarthritic patients after using a conventional extramedullary tibial resection guide to assess its effectiveness. Methods: Forty-nine primary cementless total knee replacements in 34 osteoarthritic patients were measured radiographically pre-operatively and one year post-operatively to determine the PTS and its effect on range of motion. Lateral X-rays, using the anterior cortical line of the tibia, were employed for all measurements. Results: Pre-operative PTS measured 11.83˚ (range 5˚ - 18˚), while post-operative PTS of implanted tibial components measured 11.30o (range 4˚ - 18˚). The pre-operative range of motion of 112˚ (range 30˚ to 135˚) was improved to 119˚ (range 90˚ to 135˚) post-operatively after 1 year. Conclusions: Anterior tibial shaft referencing using a conventional extramedullary tibial resection guide provides an easy and convenient method for reproducing the anatomical PTS during TKR. This methodology provided improvement in average range of motion from 112˚ pre-operatively to 119˚ post-operatively at one year.展开更多
文摘Background：A good postoperative alignment in total knee arthroplasty （TKA） is the key to achieving satisfactory results.We assessed the effect of femoral and tibial resection on the overall alignment after conventional TKA.Methods：We conducted a retrospective analysis of 212 primary TKAs in 188 patients.Intramedullary （IM）-guided resection was applied on the femoral side while extramedullary （EM）-guided resection was used on the tibial side.Using full-length X-ray,the preoperative femoral valgus angle and lower extremity alignment,as well as 2-week postoperative femoral and tibial prosthetic coronal alignment and overall lower extremity alignment,were measured.Results：Postoperatively,good prosthetic alignment was achieved in 191 cases （90.1%） on the tibial side and in 144 cases （67.9%） on the femoral side （χ^2 =5.441,P =0.02）.Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the effect of different alignment sides on the overall alignment in the coronal plane.Data were divided into five subgroups based on the valgus or varus status of the prostheses.The standardized regression coefficients of the femoral and tibial prosthetic alignment on the overall alignment were 0.666 and 0.414,respectively;in varus on both sides were 0.658 and 0.377,respectively;in valgus,0.555 and 0.030;femoral side varus and tibial side valgus,0.702 and 0.211;femoral side valgus and tibial side varus,-0.416 and 0.287.The study showed that the overall low extremity alignment was statistically influenced by the prosthetic alignment,except for the tibial prosthetic alignment when femoral prosthesis was in valgus （P =0.153）.Conclusions：In conventional TKA,tibial side EM-guided resection may offer satisfactory postoperative alignment,and femoral resection relying on IM guide may lead to more undesirable results.Postoperative coronal alignment is mainly affected by the femoral resection.Therefore,femoral side operation should receive adequate attention from the surgeons.
文摘Background: Sagittal plane placement of the tibial component in total knee replacement (TKR) has important implications for maximizing the range of flexion motion, allowing collateral ligaments to function more normally, as well as providing ideal compressive loading on the tibial bone-prosthesis interface. This study attempts to quantify the normal posterior tibial slope (PTS) angle pre-operatively and post-operatively in osteoarthritic patients after using a conventional extramedullary tibial resection guide to assess its effectiveness. Methods: Forty-nine primary cementless total knee replacements in 34 osteoarthritic patients were measured radiographically pre-operatively and one year post-operatively to determine the PTS and its effect on range of motion. Lateral X-rays, using the anterior cortical line of the tibia, were employed for all measurements. Results: Pre-operative PTS measured 11.83˚ (range 5˚ - 18˚), while post-operative PTS of implanted tibial components measured 11.30o (range 4˚ - 18˚). The pre-operative range of motion of 112˚ (range 30˚ to 135˚) was improved to 119˚ (range 90˚ to 135˚) post-operatively after 1 year. Conclusions: Anterior tibial shaft referencing using a conventional extramedullary tibial resection guide provides an easy and convenient method for reproducing the anatomical PTS during TKR. This methodology provided improvement in average range of motion from 112˚ pre-operatively to 119˚ post-operatively at one year.
