Objective To compare the DLT with the torque control blocker univent(TCBU) and to determine whether there are objective advantages of one over the other in one-lung ventilation during elective thoracic surgical cases....Objective To compare the DLT with the torque control blocker univent(TCBU) and to determine whether there are objective advantages of one over the other in one-lung ventilation during elective thoracic surgical cases.Methods 60 patients needing one-lung ventilation during elective thoracic surgical cases were randomly divided into Group D(DLT) and Group U(TCBU).The following variables were recorded and compared:①time required for intubation and position each tube,②ration of successful blind intubation,③ increase in airway peak pressure(PIP),④frequency of malpositions,⑤number of times that the fiberoptic was achieved,⑥surgical exposure,and ⑦incidence of sore throat or hoarseness.Results Statistical difference were found in increase of PIP and incidence of sore throat(P < 0.05).No statistical difference were found in the time required to intubation and position each tube,the ration of successful blind intubation,the frequency of malpositions,the number of times that the fiberoptic was achieved and the surgical exposure(P > 0.05).Conclusion TCB univent applied for one-lung ventilation is as good as DLT,and in some specific clinical situations it can offer more advantages over the DLT.展开更多
Background: One-lung ventilation (OLV) is generally adopted for thoracic surgery. The systemic application of a high fraction of inspiratory oxygen (F<sub>1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and continuous p...Background: One-lung ventilation (OLV) is generally adopted for thoracic surgery. The systemic application of a high fraction of inspiratory oxygen (F<sub>1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to the non-ventilated lung is useful for preventing arterial oxygen desaturation. The adverse effects of elevated F<sub>1</sub>O<sub>2</sub> include oxidative lung injury, resorption atelectasis and coronary and peripheral vasoconstriction. It is preferable to avoid hyperoxemia in patients with complications such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pneumonia, and bleomycin-treated lungs. We aimed to determine whether the application of 60% O<sub>2</sub> CPAP to the non-ventilated lung is sufficient to provide adequate oxygenation with 60% O<sub>2</sub> to the ventilated lung. Methods: A total of 70 patients scheduled to receive elective thoracic surgery requiring OLV were recruited. Left double-lumen tubes were applicable in all surgeries. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, to receive either 60% O<sub>2</sub> CPAP (60% CPAP group, n = 35), or 100% O<sub>2</sub> CPAP (100% CPAP group, n = 35) at a setting of 2 - 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, applied to the non-ventilated lung. Arterial blood gas analyses were obtained at the following stages: RA, spontaneous breathing under room air (RA);TLV, during total lung ventilation (TLV) prior to the initiation of OLV;T5, 5 min after the initiation of OLV;T15, 15 min after the initiation of OLV;T30, 30 min after the initiation of OLV. Results: The PaO<sub>2</sub> value in 60% CPAP group vs. 100% CPAP group at each measurement were as follows: RA (mean [standard deviation: SD], 89.7 [8.2] mmHg vs. 85.8 [11.9] mmHg);TLV (277.9 [52.9] mmHg vs. 269.2 [44.0] mmHg);T5 (191.4 [67.9] mmHg vs. 192.3 [66.0] mmHg);T15 (143.2 [67.3] mmHg vs. 154.7 [60.8] mmHg) and T30 (95.6 [32.0] mmHg vs. 112.5 [36.5] mmHg), respectively. Among the five measurement points, T30 was the only time point at which the 100% CPAP group showed a significantly gre展开更多
文摘Objective To compare the DLT with the torque control blocker univent(TCBU) and to determine whether there are objective advantages of one over the other in one-lung ventilation during elective thoracic surgical cases.Methods 60 patients needing one-lung ventilation during elective thoracic surgical cases were randomly divided into Group D(DLT) and Group U(TCBU).The following variables were recorded and compared:①time required for intubation and position each tube,②ration of successful blind intubation,③ increase in airway peak pressure(PIP),④frequency of malpositions,⑤number of times that the fiberoptic was achieved,⑥surgical exposure,and ⑦incidence of sore throat or hoarseness.Results Statistical difference were found in increase of PIP and incidence of sore throat(P < 0.05).No statistical difference were found in the time required to intubation and position each tube,the ration of successful blind intubation,the frequency of malpositions,the number of times that the fiberoptic was achieved and the surgical exposure(P > 0.05).Conclusion TCB univent applied for one-lung ventilation is as good as DLT,and in some specific clinical situations it can offer more advantages over the DLT.
文摘Background: One-lung ventilation (OLV) is generally adopted for thoracic surgery. The systemic application of a high fraction of inspiratory oxygen (F<sub>1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to the non-ventilated lung is useful for preventing arterial oxygen desaturation. The adverse effects of elevated F<sub>1</sub>O<sub>2</sub> include oxidative lung injury, resorption atelectasis and coronary and peripheral vasoconstriction. It is preferable to avoid hyperoxemia in patients with complications such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pneumonia, and bleomycin-treated lungs. We aimed to determine whether the application of 60% O<sub>2</sub> CPAP to the non-ventilated lung is sufficient to provide adequate oxygenation with 60% O<sub>2</sub> to the ventilated lung. Methods: A total of 70 patients scheduled to receive elective thoracic surgery requiring OLV were recruited. Left double-lumen tubes were applicable in all surgeries. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, to receive either 60% O<sub>2</sub> CPAP (60% CPAP group, n = 35), or 100% O<sub>2</sub> CPAP (100% CPAP group, n = 35) at a setting of 2 - 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, applied to the non-ventilated lung. Arterial blood gas analyses were obtained at the following stages: RA, spontaneous breathing under room air (RA);TLV, during total lung ventilation (TLV) prior to the initiation of OLV;T5, 5 min after the initiation of OLV;T15, 15 min after the initiation of OLV;T30, 30 min after the initiation of OLV. Results: The PaO<sub>2</sub> value in 60% CPAP group vs. 100% CPAP group at each measurement were as follows: RA (mean [standard deviation: SD], 89.7 [8.2] mmHg vs. 85.8 [11.9] mmHg);TLV (277.9 [52.9] mmHg vs. 269.2 [44.0] mmHg);T5 (191.4 [67.9] mmHg vs. 192.3 [66.0] mmHg);T15 (143.2 [67.3] mmHg vs. 154.7 [60.8] mmHg) and T30 (95.6 [32.0] mmHg vs. 112.5 [36.5] mmHg), respectively. Among the five measurement points, T30 was the only time point at which the 100% CPAP group showed a significantly gre
