背景:以往的研究表明经皮神经电刺激对缓解多种疾病引起的疼痛症状有效,但其对缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛的确切疗效仍存在争议。且经皮神经电刺激可分为高频和低频两种模式,目前关于其分别针对膝骨关节炎疼痛的疗效尚不明确。目的:荟萃分...背景:以往的研究表明经皮神经电刺激对缓解多种疾病引起的疼痛症状有效,但其对缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛的确切疗效仍存在争议。且经皮神经电刺激可分为高频和低频两种模式,目前关于其分别针对膝骨关节炎疼痛的疗效尚不明确。目的:荟萃分析高频经皮神经电刺激与低频经皮神经电刺激缓解膝骨关节炎疼痛的作用。方法:计算机检索Pub Med,Embase和Cochrane数据库以及手工检索国内外公开发表的有关经皮神经电刺激缓解膝骨关节炎疼痛的随机对照试验,所有检索截止至2014年2月。严格评价纳入研究的方法学质量并提取数据,2名研究人员独立运用Rev Man 5.2软件对数据进行统计分析。结果与结论:共纳入10项随机对照试验,累计519例研究对象。荟萃分析结果显示,与对照组相比,高频经皮神经电刺激可显著缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛[MD=-0.56,95%CI(-0.98,-0.15),P=0.008];与对照组相比,低频经皮神经电刺激并未缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛[MD=-0.13,95%CI(-1.63,1.38),P=0.87];与低频经皮神经电刺激相比,高频经皮神经电刺激可显著缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛[MD=-0.85,95%CI(-1.32,-0.37),P=0.000 5]。提示高频经皮神经电刺激可一定程度缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛症状,而对比高频经皮神经电刺激,低频经皮神经电刺激对缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛症状无明显作用。但由于样本量较小,纳入各研究在参数选择存在差异,存在一定局限性,此结论未来尚需更多高质量的随机对照试验进一步证实。展开更多
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection and its clinical significance.METHODS:...OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection and its clinical significance.METHODS:Sixty-four patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomly divided into two groups,the control group (group A) and the TEAS group (group B).Patients in the TEAS group received electroacupuncture stimulation of bilateral Zusanli (ST 36) at 30 min before anesthesia to the end of surgery.The patients in the control group were not given the stimulation.Perioperative anesthesia management of the two groups were performed according to the ERAS guidelines,and postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used.The amount of remifentanil used in the two groups was observed and recorded,and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the 4,12,24 and 48 h after surgery in the two groups was recorded.Moreover,postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative feeding time,postoperative first ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay length were compared between the two groups.RESULTS:Compared with group A,the VAS score of group B decreased significantly at 48 h after operation (P < 0.05).The postoperative anal exhaust time in group B was significantly shorter than that of group A (P < 0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to remifentanil consumption,postoperative feeding time,postoperative first ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay (all P > 0.05).CONCLUSION:TEAS can promote the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function and reduce the pain intensity 48 h after surgery,thus satisfying the need of early postoperative analgesia.展开更多
文摘背景:以往的研究表明经皮神经电刺激对缓解多种疾病引起的疼痛症状有效,但其对缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛的确切疗效仍存在争议。且经皮神经电刺激可分为高频和低频两种模式,目前关于其分别针对膝骨关节炎疼痛的疗效尚不明确。目的:荟萃分析高频经皮神经电刺激与低频经皮神经电刺激缓解膝骨关节炎疼痛的作用。方法:计算机检索Pub Med,Embase和Cochrane数据库以及手工检索国内外公开发表的有关经皮神经电刺激缓解膝骨关节炎疼痛的随机对照试验,所有检索截止至2014年2月。严格评价纳入研究的方法学质量并提取数据,2名研究人员独立运用Rev Man 5.2软件对数据进行统计分析。结果与结论:共纳入10项随机对照试验,累计519例研究对象。荟萃分析结果显示,与对照组相比,高频经皮神经电刺激可显著缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛[MD=-0.56,95%CI(-0.98,-0.15),P=0.008];与对照组相比,低频经皮神经电刺激并未缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛[MD=-0.13,95%CI(-1.63,1.38),P=0.87];与低频经皮神经电刺激相比,高频经皮神经电刺激可显著缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛[MD=-0.85,95%CI(-1.32,-0.37),P=0.000 5]。提示高频经皮神经电刺激可一定程度缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛症状,而对比高频经皮神经电刺激,低频经皮神经电刺激对缓解膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛症状无明显作用。但由于样本量较小,纳入各研究在参数选择存在差异,存在一定局限性,此结论未来尚需更多高质量的随机对照试验进一步证实。
文摘OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection and its clinical significance.METHODS:Sixty-four patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomly divided into two groups,the control group (group A) and the TEAS group (group B).Patients in the TEAS group received electroacupuncture stimulation of bilateral Zusanli (ST 36) at 30 min before anesthesia to the end of surgery.The patients in the control group were not given the stimulation.Perioperative anesthesia management of the two groups were performed according to the ERAS guidelines,and postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used.The amount of remifentanil used in the two groups was observed and recorded,and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the 4,12,24 and 48 h after surgery in the two groups was recorded.Moreover,postoperative anal exhaust time,postoperative feeding time,postoperative first ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay length were compared between the two groups.RESULTS:Compared with group A,the VAS score of group B decreased significantly at 48 h after operation (P < 0.05).The postoperative anal exhaust time in group B was significantly shorter than that of group A (P < 0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to remifentanil consumption,postoperative feeding time,postoperative first ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay (all P > 0.05).CONCLUSION:TEAS can promote the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function and reduce the pain intensity 48 h after surgery,thus satisfying the need of early postoperative analgesia.
