目的探究齐刺滞针经筋刺法在缓解腰椎间盘突出症的疼痛及改善症状体征方面的效果。方法选取2014年8月—2018年8月在蚌埠医学院第二附属医院就诊的90例腰椎间盘突出症患者,采用抽签方法随机分为3组,每组30例,3组分别采用齐刺滞针经筋刺法...目的探究齐刺滞针经筋刺法在缓解腰椎间盘突出症的疼痛及改善症状体征方面的效果。方法选取2014年8月—2018年8月在蚌埠医学院第二附属医院就诊的90例腰椎间盘突出症患者,采用抽签方法随机分为3组,每组30例,3组分别采用齐刺滞针经筋刺法,常规滞针经筋刺法,齐刺经筋刺法进行治疗。连续治疗2周后,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)及日本骨科协会下腰痛评分法(Japanese orthopaedic association scores,JOA)比较3组患者的疼痛缓解情况和临床治疗效果。结果治疗结束后,VAS评分:齐刺滞针经筋刺法组为(0.30±0.60)分,常规滞针经筋刺法组为(1.43±0.82)分,齐刺经筋刺法组为(1.60±0.77)分,均低于治疗前(均P<0.01),齐刺滞针经筋刺法组患者VAS评分明显低于其他2组(均P<0.05);JOA评分:齐刺滞针经筋刺组为(27.73±2.24)分、常规滞针经筋刺法组为(23.33±3.37)分,齐刺经筋刺法组为(24.10±2.71)分,均高于治疗前(均P<0.01),齐刺滞针经筋刺法组患者JOA评分明显高于其他2组(均P<0.05);3组的临床控制率分别为90.0%、60.0%、60.0%,齐刺滞针经筋疗法的临床控制率明显高于其他2组(均P<0.05)。结论齐刺滞针经筋刺法较传统针灸更能有效缓解腰椎间盘突出症患者的疼痛,改善患者的症状体征,提高临床控制率,提高患者生活质量。展开更多
Objective To explore the treatment effect of sticking-needle acupuncture plus tendon-regulating manipulation on pain,swelling and joint dysfunction due to acute ankle sprain.Methods A total of 80 patients with acute a...Objective To explore the treatment effect of sticking-needle acupuncture plus tendon-regulating manipulation on pain,swelling and joint dysfunction due to acute ankle sprain.Methods A total of 80 patients with acute ankle sprain were recruited and divided into a control group and a treatment group according to the random number table method,with 40 patients in each group.Both groups received the same conventional interventions.The control group was treated with additional tendon-regulating manipulation,and the treatment group was treated with tendon-regulating manipulation plus sticking-needle acupuncture.The pain,swelling and joint dysfunction of the ankle were observed in both groups before and after 3 d,7 d and 14 d of treatment.Results Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the visual analog scale(VAS)score of pain between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the VAS scores of both groups showed a decreasing trend over time,and the differences within the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 3 d,7 d and 14 d of treatment,the VAS scores in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of swelling between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the degrees of swelling in both groups showed a decreasing trend over time,and the differences within the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 3 d and 7 d of treatment,the degrees of swelling in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the degree of swelling between the two groups after 14 d of treatment(P>0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the American Orthopedic Foot Ankle Society(AOFAS)ankle-hindfoot scale score between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale scores of both groups s展开更多
文摘目的探究齐刺滞针经筋刺法在缓解腰椎间盘突出症的疼痛及改善症状体征方面的效果。方法选取2014年8月—2018年8月在蚌埠医学院第二附属医院就诊的90例腰椎间盘突出症患者,采用抽签方法随机分为3组,每组30例,3组分别采用齐刺滞针经筋刺法,常规滞针经筋刺法,齐刺经筋刺法进行治疗。连续治疗2周后,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)及日本骨科协会下腰痛评分法(Japanese orthopaedic association scores,JOA)比较3组患者的疼痛缓解情况和临床治疗效果。结果治疗结束后,VAS评分:齐刺滞针经筋刺法组为(0.30±0.60)分,常规滞针经筋刺法组为(1.43±0.82)分,齐刺经筋刺法组为(1.60±0.77)分,均低于治疗前(均P<0.01),齐刺滞针经筋刺法组患者VAS评分明显低于其他2组(均P<0.05);JOA评分:齐刺滞针经筋刺组为(27.73±2.24)分、常规滞针经筋刺法组为(23.33±3.37)分,齐刺经筋刺法组为(24.10±2.71)分,均高于治疗前(均P<0.01),齐刺滞针经筋刺法组患者JOA评分明显高于其他2组(均P<0.05);3组的临床控制率分别为90.0%、60.0%、60.0%,齐刺滞针经筋疗法的临床控制率明显高于其他2组(均P<0.05)。结论齐刺滞针经筋刺法较传统针灸更能有效缓解腰椎间盘突出症患者的疼痛,改善患者的症状体征,提高临床控制率,提高患者生活质量。
文摘Objective To explore the treatment effect of sticking-needle acupuncture plus tendon-regulating manipulation on pain,swelling and joint dysfunction due to acute ankle sprain.Methods A total of 80 patients with acute ankle sprain were recruited and divided into a control group and a treatment group according to the random number table method,with 40 patients in each group.Both groups received the same conventional interventions.The control group was treated with additional tendon-regulating manipulation,and the treatment group was treated with tendon-regulating manipulation plus sticking-needle acupuncture.The pain,swelling and joint dysfunction of the ankle were observed in both groups before and after 3 d,7 d and 14 d of treatment.Results Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the visual analog scale(VAS)score of pain between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the VAS scores of both groups showed a decreasing trend over time,and the differences within the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 3 d,7 d and 14 d of treatment,the VAS scores in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of swelling between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the degrees of swelling in both groups showed a decreasing trend over time,and the differences within the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 3 d and 7 d of treatment,the degrees of swelling in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the degree of swelling between the two groups after 14 d of treatment(P>0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the American Orthopedic Foot Ankle Society(AOFAS)ankle-hindfoot scale score between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale scores of both groups s
