目的评估硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜在良恶性中心气道重度狭窄治疗中的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2015年2月至2019年1月在蚌埠医学院第一附属医院呼吸内镜室行硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜治疗的46例良恶性中心气道狭窄患者的临床资...目的评估硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜在良恶性中心气道重度狭窄治疗中的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2015年2月至2019年1月在蚌埠医学院第一附属医院呼吸内镜室行硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜治疗的46例良恶性中心气道狭窄患者的临床资料。分析患者的一般资料、诊断结果、临床表现、影像学及介入治疗情况,评估气道狭窄严重程度、气道狭窄类型、狭窄部位分布,使用呼吸困难指数(MRC DI)、卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)评估临床症状及生活质量改善程度,通过定期随访动态观察评价临床疗效,据术中、术后并发症发生情况进行安全性评估,评价术后转归。结果46例患者年龄(62.43±12.34)岁。气管狭窄36例(78.26%),左主支气管6例(13.04%),右主支气管10例(21.74%),右中间段支气管2例(4.35%);其中恶性中心气道狭窄33例(71.74%),良性病变13例(28.26%)。46例患者共进行58次介入治疗,根据病情选择支架置入、冷冻、球囊扩张等介入治疗方法。介入治疗前气管狭窄程度(85.42±7.81)%,术后为(24.17±5.79)%;右主支气管狭窄程度由介入治疗前的(81.00±17.13)%改善为(20.50±6.43)%,术后左主支气管狭窄程度(24.17±9.14)%,较术前(77.50±16.66)%明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(t=42.73,t=22.43,t=19.02,P均<0.001)。术后MRC DI 0.98±0.62,明显低于术前的3.42±0.57(t=19.65,P<0.001);介入治疗术后KPS(83.91±8.96)明显高于术前(34.01±13.14)(t=21.28,P<0.001)。并发症包括低氧血症4例(8.70%,4/46),一过性室早1例(2.17%,1/46),牙齿脱落2例(4.35%,2/46)。恶性中心气道狭窄患者首次介入治疗后1年生存率为13.79%(4/29),另有4例恶性肿瘤患者随访中;13例良性气道狭窄者目前生活质量良好。结论硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜治疗可迅速缓解中心气道狭窄,安全、可行、有效,能够提高患者的生存质量。展开更多
BACKGROUND The technological evolution of bronchoscopy has led to the widespread adoption of flexible techniques and their use for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.Currently,there is an active debate regarding...BACKGROUND The technological evolution of bronchoscopy has led to the widespread adoption of flexible techniques and their use for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.Currently,there is an active debate regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of rigid vs flexible bronchoscopy in the treatment of foreign body aspiration.AIM To evaluate our experience with tracheobronchial foreign body extraction using flexible bronchoscopy and provide a literature overview.METHODS This was a single-centre retrospective study.Twenty-four patients were enrolled between January 2017 and January 2023.Medical records of patients aged below 18 years who were admitted to authors’affiliated institution with a suspected diagnosis of foreign body aspiration were collected from hospital’s database to Microsoft Excel 2019.Data were analysed using MedCalc Statistical Software.RESULTS Patient ages varied from 9 months to 11 years.The median age was 23.5 months,95%confidence interval(CI)19.49-44.77.We observed age clustering in children with foreign body aspiration at our institution with three age subgroups:(1)0-25 months;(2)40-60 months;and(3)120-140 months.We expectancy of an organic tracheobronchial foreign body was significantly higher in 0-25 months subgroup than that in older ones when subgroups 40-60 and 120-140 months were combined together(odds ratio=10.0,95%CI:1.44-29.26,P=0.0197).Successful foreign body extraction was performed in all cases.Conversion to a rigid bronchoscope was not required in any of the cases.No major complications(massive bleeding,tracheobronchial tree perforation,or asphyxia)were observed.CONCLUSION Flexible bronchoscopy is an effective and safe method for tracheobronchial foreign body extraction in children.展开更多
文摘目的评估硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜在良恶性中心气道重度狭窄治疗中的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2015年2月至2019年1月在蚌埠医学院第一附属医院呼吸内镜室行硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜治疗的46例良恶性中心气道狭窄患者的临床资料。分析患者的一般资料、诊断结果、临床表现、影像学及介入治疗情况,评估气道狭窄严重程度、气道狭窄类型、狭窄部位分布,使用呼吸困难指数(MRC DI)、卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)评估临床症状及生活质量改善程度,通过定期随访动态观察评价临床疗效,据术中、术后并发症发生情况进行安全性评估,评价术后转归。结果46例患者年龄(62.43±12.34)岁。气管狭窄36例(78.26%),左主支气管6例(13.04%),右主支气管10例(21.74%),右中间段支气管2例(4.35%);其中恶性中心气道狭窄33例(71.74%),良性病变13例(28.26%)。46例患者共进行58次介入治疗,根据病情选择支架置入、冷冻、球囊扩张等介入治疗方法。介入治疗前气管狭窄程度(85.42±7.81)%,术后为(24.17±5.79)%;右主支气管狭窄程度由介入治疗前的(81.00±17.13)%改善为(20.50±6.43)%,术后左主支气管狭窄程度(24.17±9.14)%,较术前(77.50±16.66)%明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(t=42.73,t=22.43,t=19.02,P均<0.001)。术后MRC DI 0.98±0.62,明显低于术前的3.42±0.57(t=19.65,P<0.001);介入治疗术后KPS(83.91±8.96)明显高于术前(34.01±13.14)(t=21.28,P<0.001)。并发症包括低氧血症4例(8.70%,4/46),一过性室早1例(2.17%,1/46),牙齿脱落2例(4.35%,2/46)。恶性中心气道狭窄患者首次介入治疗后1年生存率为13.79%(4/29),另有4例恶性肿瘤患者随访中;13例良性气道狭窄者目前生活质量良好。结论硬质气管镜联合电子气管镜治疗可迅速缓解中心气道狭窄,安全、可行、有效,能够提高患者的生存质量。
文摘BACKGROUND The technological evolution of bronchoscopy has led to the widespread adoption of flexible techniques and their use for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.Currently,there is an active debate regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of rigid vs flexible bronchoscopy in the treatment of foreign body aspiration.AIM To evaluate our experience with tracheobronchial foreign body extraction using flexible bronchoscopy and provide a literature overview.METHODS This was a single-centre retrospective study.Twenty-four patients were enrolled between January 2017 and January 2023.Medical records of patients aged below 18 years who were admitted to authors’affiliated institution with a suspected diagnosis of foreign body aspiration were collected from hospital’s database to Microsoft Excel 2019.Data were analysed using MedCalc Statistical Software.RESULTS Patient ages varied from 9 months to 11 years.The median age was 23.5 months,95%confidence interval(CI)19.49-44.77.We observed age clustering in children with foreign body aspiration at our institution with three age subgroups:(1)0-25 months;(2)40-60 months;and(3)120-140 months.We expectancy of an organic tracheobronchial foreign body was significantly higher in 0-25 months subgroup than that in older ones when subgroups 40-60 and 120-140 months were combined together(odds ratio=10.0,95%CI:1.44-29.26,P=0.0197).Successful foreign body extraction was performed in all cases.Conversion to a rigid bronchoscope was not required in any of the cases.No major complications(massive bleeding,tracheobronchial tree perforation,or asphyxia)were observed.CONCLUSION Flexible bronchoscopy is an effective and safe method for tracheobronchial foreign body extraction in children.
