Background: The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS)-Parent Form shows satisfactory reli-ability and validity to assess the readiness of parents to take care of their children discharged from hospitals in Wes...Background: The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS)-Parent Form shows satisfactory reli-ability and validity to assess the readiness of parents to take care of their children discharged from hospitals in Western countries. However, the reliability and validity of this instrument has not been evaluated in Chinese populations.Objectives: Evaluate the psychometric features of the RHDS-Parent Form among Chinese parents of preterm infants. Methods: The RHDS-Parent Form was translated into a Chinese version following an international in-strument translation guideline. A total of 168 parents with preterm infants were recruited from the neonatal intensive care units of two tertiary-level hospitals in China. The internal consistency of this measure was assessed using the Cronbach's a coefficient;confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the construct validity;and Pearson correlation coefficient was used to report the convergent validity. Results: The Chinese version of RHDS (C-RHDS)-Parent Form included 22 items with 4 subscales, ac-counting for 56.71% of the total variance. The C-RHDS-Parent Form and its subscales showed good reliability (Cronbach's a values 0.78-0.92). This measure and its subscales showed positive correlations with the score of Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale. Conclusion: The factor structure of C-RHDS-Parent Form is partially consistent with the original English version. Future studies are needed to explore the factors within this measure before it is widely used in Chinese clinical care settings.展开更多
目的评价不孕症相关压力评估工具的测量学性能及研究的方法学质量。方法计算机检索中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus和CINHAL中有关不孕症相关压力评估工具测...目的评价不孕症相关压力评估工具的测量学性能及研究的方法学质量。方法计算机检索中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus和CINHAL中有关不孕症相关压力评估工具测量学性能评价的研究,检索时限均为建库至2023年11月1日,2名研究者独立筛选文献和提取资料,采用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南对纳入的评估工具进行评价并形成推荐意见。结果共纳入20项研究,包括8个评估工具,分别为生育问题压力清单、不孕症困扰量表、生育问题清单、生育问题清单简表、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表简表、不孕不育相关压力量表、辅助生殖女患者心理症状与压力量表。各评估工具的内容效度未报告或不确定,证据质量为中等,均为B级推荐。结论生育问题清单、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表简表、不孕不育相关压力量表可暂时被推荐使用,但各工具的测量学性能仍有待充分验证,临床医护人员需根据实际情况选择适宜的评估工具。展开更多
文摘Background: The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS)-Parent Form shows satisfactory reli-ability and validity to assess the readiness of parents to take care of their children discharged from hospitals in Western countries. However, the reliability and validity of this instrument has not been evaluated in Chinese populations.Objectives: Evaluate the psychometric features of the RHDS-Parent Form among Chinese parents of preterm infants. Methods: The RHDS-Parent Form was translated into a Chinese version following an international in-strument translation guideline. A total of 168 parents with preterm infants were recruited from the neonatal intensive care units of two tertiary-level hospitals in China. The internal consistency of this measure was assessed using the Cronbach's a coefficient;confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the construct validity;and Pearson correlation coefficient was used to report the convergent validity. Results: The Chinese version of RHDS (C-RHDS)-Parent Form included 22 items with 4 subscales, ac-counting for 56.71% of the total variance. The C-RHDS-Parent Form and its subscales showed good reliability (Cronbach's a values 0.78-0.92). This measure and its subscales showed positive correlations with the score of Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale. Conclusion: The factor structure of C-RHDS-Parent Form is partially consistent with the original English version. Future studies are needed to explore the factors within this measure before it is widely used in Chinese clinical care settings.
文摘目的评价不孕症相关压力评估工具的测量学性能及研究的方法学质量。方法计算机检索中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus和CINHAL中有关不孕症相关压力评估工具测量学性能评价的研究,检索时限均为建库至2023年11月1日,2名研究者独立筛选文献和提取资料,采用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南对纳入的评估工具进行评价并形成推荐意见。结果共纳入20项研究,包括8个评估工具,分别为生育问题压力清单、不孕症困扰量表、生育问题清单、生育问题清单简表、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表简表、不孕不育相关压力量表、辅助生殖女患者心理症状与压力量表。各评估工具的内容效度未报告或不确定,证据质量为中等,均为B级推荐。结论生育问题清单、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表、哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕不育生育压力量表简表、不孕不育相关压力量表可暂时被推荐使用,但各工具的测量学性能仍有待充分验证,临床医护人员需根据实际情况选择适宜的评估工具。
基金supported by the Innovation Research Team of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai [SHSM U-ZDCX20212801]Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of M edicine-Nursing Development ProgramClinical Research Fund from Health Commission of Shanghai [202140514]
