目的观察疏脑解郁汤治疗卒中后抑郁症的临床疗效。方法将符合纳入标准的116例卒中后抑郁患者按完全随机方法分为治疗组和对照组,研究过程中病例脱落5例,两组样本数分别为治疗组57例,对照组54例。治疗组予疏脑解郁汤每日1剂,分早、晚两...目的观察疏脑解郁汤治疗卒中后抑郁症的临床疗效。方法将符合纳入标准的116例卒中后抑郁患者按完全随机方法分为治疗组和对照组,研究过程中病例脱落5例,两组样本数分别为治疗组57例,对照组54例。治疗组予疏脑解郁汤每日1剂,分早、晚两次口服,各100 m L;对照组予帕罗西汀片,每次20 mg,每日1次。观察比较两组中医证候疗效、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、神经功能缺损评分(SSS)及安全性指标。结果用药8周末,治疗组愈显率80.70%,总有效率98.25%;对照组愈显率46.29%,总有效率92.59%。治疗组愈显率、总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。HAMD评分在治疗后4周,治疗组优于对照组,而治疗后8周两组评分则无统计学意义。治疗4周时两组SSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但治疗8周时,治疗组SSS评分优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。展开更多
OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of filiform needle acupuncture for poststroke depression, and to compare acupuncture with the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressant drugs. DATA RETRIEVAL： We retr...OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of filiform needle acupuncture for poststroke depression, and to compare acupuncture with the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressant drugs. DATA RETRIEVAL： We retrieved data from the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure （1979-2012）, Wanfang （1980-2012）, VIP （1989-2012）, Chinese Biomedical Literature （1975- 2012）, PubMed （1966-2012）, Ovid Lww （-2012）, and Cochrane Library （-2012） Database using the internet. SELECTION CRITERIA： Randomized controlled trials on filiform needle acupuncture versus antidepressant drugs for treatment of poststroke depression were included. Moreover, the in- cluded articles scored at least 4 points on the Jadad scale. Exclusion criteria： other acupuncture therapies as treatment group, not stroke-induced depression patients, score 〈 4 points, non-ran- domized controlled trials, or animal trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： These were the Hamilton Depression Scale scores, clinical ef- fective rate, Self-Rating Depression Scale scores, Side Effect Rating Scale scores, and incidence of adverse reaction and events. RESULTS： A total of 17 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Meta-analysis results displayed that after 4 weeks of treatment, clinical effective rate was better in patients treated with fill- form needle acupuncture than those treated with simple antidepressant drugs [relative risk = 1.11, 95% confidence interval （C/）： 1.03-1.21, P = 0.01]. At 6 weeks, clinical effective rate was similar between filiform needle acupuncture and antidepressant drug groups. At 2 weeks after filiform needle acupuncture, Hamilton Depression Scale （17 items） scores were lower than in the antide- pressant drug group （mean difference = -2.34, 95%CI： -3.46 to -1.22, P 〈 0.000,1）. At 4 weeks, Hamilton Depression Scale （24 items） scores were similar between filiform needle acupuncture and antidepressant drug groups. Self-Rating Depression Scale scores were lower in filiform needle展开更多
文摘目的观察疏脑解郁汤治疗卒中后抑郁症的临床疗效。方法将符合纳入标准的116例卒中后抑郁患者按完全随机方法分为治疗组和对照组,研究过程中病例脱落5例,两组样本数分别为治疗组57例,对照组54例。治疗组予疏脑解郁汤每日1剂,分早、晚两次口服,各100 m L;对照组予帕罗西汀片,每次20 mg,每日1次。观察比较两组中医证候疗效、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、神经功能缺损评分(SSS)及安全性指标。结果用药8周末,治疗组愈显率80.70%,总有效率98.25%;对照组愈显率46.29%,总有效率92.59%。治疗组愈显率、总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。HAMD评分在治疗后4周,治疗组优于对照组,而治疗后8周两组评分则无统计学意义。治疗4周时两组SSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但治疗8周时,治疗组SSS评分优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
基金supported by the Guangdong Provincial"211 Engineering"Stage-III Key Disciplines Construction Project in China,No.Yue 2009431
文摘OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of filiform needle acupuncture for poststroke depression, and to compare acupuncture with the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressant drugs. DATA RETRIEVAL： We retrieved data from the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure （1979-2012）, Wanfang （1980-2012）, VIP （1989-2012）, Chinese Biomedical Literature （1975- 2012）, PubMed （1966-2012）, Ovid Lww （-2012）, and Cochrane Library （-2012） Database using the internet. SELECTION CRITERIA： Randomized controlled trials on filiform needle acupuncture versus antidepressant drugs for treatment of poststroke depression were included. Moreover, the in- cluded articles scored at least 4 points on the Jadad scale. Exclusion criteria： other acupuncture therapies as treatment group, not stroke-induced depression patients, score 〈 4 points, non-ran- domized controlled trials, or animal trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： These were the Hamilton Depression Scale scores, clinical ef- fective rate, Self-Rating Depression Scale scores, Side Effect Rating Scale scores, and incidence of adverse reaction and events. RESULTS： A total of 17 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Meta-analysis results displayed that after 4 weeks of treatment, clinical effective rate was better in patients treated with fill- form needle acupuncture than those treated with simple antidepressant drugs [relative risk = 1.11, 95% confidence interval （C/）： 1.03-1.21, P = 0.01]. At 6 weeks, clinical effective rate was similar between filiform needle acupuncture and antidepressant drug groups. At 2 weeks after filiform needle acupuncture, Hamilton Depression Scale （17 items） scores were lower than in the antide- pressant drug group （mean difference = -2.34, 95%CI： -3.46 to -1.22, P 〈 0.000,1）. At 4 weeks, Hamilton Depression Scale （24 items） scores were similar between filiform needle acupuncture and antidepressant drug groups. Self-Rating Depression Scale scores were lower in filiform needle
