AIM： To clarify whether mucosal crypt patterns observed with magnifying colonoscopy are feasible to distinguish non-neoplastic polyps from neoplastic polyps. METHODS： From June 1999 through March 2000, 180 consecuti...AIM： To clarify whether mucosal crypt patterns observed with magnifying colonoscopy are feasible to distinguish non-neoplastic polyps from neoplastic polyps. METHODS： From June 1999 through March 2000, 180 consecutive patients with 210 lesions diagnosed with a magnifying colonoscope （CF-200Z, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan） were enrolled. Magnification and chromoendoscopy with 0.2% indigo-carmine dye was applied to each lesion for mucosal crypt observation. Lesions showing types Ⅰ and Ⅱ crypt patterns were considered non-neoplastic and examined histologically by biopsy, whereas lesions showing types Ⅲ to Ⅴ crypt patterns were removed endoscopically or surgically. The correlation of endoscopic diagnosis and histologic diagnosis was then investigated. RESULTS： At endoscopy, 24 lesions showed a type Ⅰ or Ⅱ pit pattern, and 186 lesions showed type Ⅲ to Ⅴ pit patterns. With histologic examination, 26 lesions were diagnosed as non-neoplastic polyps, and 184 lesions were diagnosed as neoplastic polyps. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 99.1% （208/210）. The sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% （24/26） and 99.8% （184/186）, respectively. CONCLUSION： Magnifying colonoscopy could be used as a non-biopsy technique for differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.展开更多
AIM: To clarify whether subclassification of the type VI pit pattern on the basis of magnifying colonoscopy findings is useful in determining the type and depth of invasion of colorectal neoplasms.METHODS: We retrospe...AIM: To clarify whether subclassification of the type VI pit pattern on the basis of magnifying colonoscopy findings is useful in determining the type and depth of invasion of colorectal neoplasms.METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 272 colorectal neoplasms (117 dysplasias and 155 submucosal invasive carcinomas; 228 patients) with a type V pit pattern [type VI, n = 202; type VN, n = 70 (Kudo and Tsuruta classification system)]. We divided lesions with a type VI pit pattern into two subclasses, mildly irregular lesions and severely irregular lesions, according to the prominent and detailed magnifying colonoscopy findings. We examined the relation between these two subclasses and histology/invasion depth.RESULTS: One hundred and four lesions (51.5%) were judged to be mildly irregular, and 98 lesions (48.5%) were judged to be severely irregular. Ninety-seven (93.3%) mildly irregular lesions showed dysplasias or submucosal invasion of less than 1000 μm (SM < 1000 μm). Fifty-five (56.1%) severely irregular lesions showed submucosal invasion equal to or deeper than 1000 μm (SM ≥ 1000 μm). Mild irregularity was found significantly more often in dysplasias or lesions with SM < 1000 μm than in lesions with SM ≥ 1000 μm (P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: Subclassification of the type VI pit pattern is useful for identifying dysplasias or lesions with SM < 1000 μm.展开更多
BACKGROUND Pit pattern classification using magnifying chromoendoscopy is the established method for diagnosing colorectal lesions. The Japan Narrow-band-imaging(NBI) Expert Team(JNET) classification is a novel NBI ma...BACKGROUND Pit pattern classification using magnifying chromoendoscopy is the established method for diagnosing colorectal lesions. The Japan Narrow-band-imaging(NBI) Expert Team(JNET) classification is a novel NBI magnifying endoscopic classification that focuses on the vessel, and surface patterns.AIM To determine the diagnostic efficacy of each category of the JNET and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of each category of the JNET and Pit pattern classifications were calculated.RESULTS A total of 19227 colorectal lesions in 31 studies were included. The diagnostic performance of the JNET classification was equivalent to the Pit pattern classification in each corresponding category. The pooled sensitivity, specificity,and area under the curve(AUC) for each category of the JNET classification were as follows: 0.73(95%CI: 0.55-0.85), 0.99(95%CI: 0.97-1.00), and 0.97(95%CI: 0.95-0.98), respectively, for Type 1;0.88(95%CI: 0.78-0.94), 0.72(95%CI: 0.64-0.79), and 0.84(95%CI: 0.81-0.87), respectively, for Type 2 A;0.56(95%CI: 0.47-0.64), 0.91(95%CI: 0.79-0.96), and 0.72(95%CI: 0.68-0.76), respectively, for Type 2 B;0.51(95%CI: 0.42-0.61), 1.00(95%CI: 1.00-1.00), and 0.90(95%CI: 0.87-0.93), respectively, for Type 3.CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that the diagnostic efficacy of the JNET classification may be equivalent to that of the Pit pattern classification. However, due to its simpler and clearer clinical application, the JNET classification should be promoted for the classification of colorectal lesions, and to guide the treatment strategy.展开更多
文摘AIM： To clarify whether mucosal crypt patterns observed with magnifying colonoscopy are feasible to distinguish non-neoplastic polyps from neoplastic polyps. METHODS： From June 1999 through March 2000, 180 consecutive patients with 210 lesions diagnosed with a magnifying colonoscope （CF-200Z, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan） were enrolled. Magnification and chromoendoscopy with 0.2% indigo-carmine dye was applied to each lesion for mucosal crypt observation. Lesions showing types Ⅰ and Ⅱ crypt patterns were considered non-neoplastic and examined histologically by biopsy, whereas lesions showing types Ⅲ to Ⅴ crypt patterns were removed endoscopically or surgically. The correlation of endoscopic diagnosis and histologic diagnosis was then investigated. RESULTS： At endoscopy, 24 lesions showed a type Ⅰ or Ⅱ pit pattern, and 186 lesions showed type Ⅲ to Ⅴ pit patterns. With histologic examination, 26 lesions were diagnosed as non-neoplastic polyps, and 184 lesions were diagnosed as neoplastic polyps. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 99.1% （208/210）. The sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% （24/26） and 99.8% （184/186）, respectively. CONCLUSION： Magnifying colonoscopy could be used as a non-biopsy technique for differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.
基金a grant from the Japanese Society of Gastro-enterological Endoscopy, Chugoku Branch
文摘AIM: To clarify whether subclassification of the type VI pit pattern on the basis of magnifying colonoscopy findings is useful in determining the type and depth of invasion of colorectal neoplasms.METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 272 colorectal neoplasms (117 dysplasias and 155 submucosal invasive carcinomas; 228 patients) with a type V pit pattern [type VI, n = 202; type VN, n = 70 (Kudo and Tsuruta classification system)]. We divided lesions with a type VI pit pattern into two subclasses, mildly irregular lesions and severely irregular lesions, according to the prominent and detailed magnifying colonoscopy findings. We examined the relation between these two subclasses and histology/invasion depth.RESULTS: One hundred and four lesions (51.5%) were judged to be mildly irregular, and 98 lesions (48.5%) were judged to be severely irregular. Ninety-seven (93.3%) mildly irregular lesions showed dysplasias or submucosal invasion of less than 1000 μm (SM < 1000 μm). Fifty-five (56.1%) severely irregular lesions showed submucosal invasion equal to or deeper than 1000 μm (SM ≥ 1000 μm). Mild irregularity was found significantly more often in dysplasias or lesions with SM < 1000 μm than in lesions with SM ≥ 1000 μm (P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: Subclassification of the type VI pit pattern is useful for identifying dysplasias or lesions with SM < 1000 μm.
基金Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province,No. LQ20H160061Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission,No. 2018255969。
文摘BACKGROUND Pit pattern classification using magnifying chromoendoscopy is the established method for diagnosing colorectal lesions. The Japan Narrow-band-imaging(NBI) Expert Team(JNET) classification is a novel NBI magnifying endoscopic classification that focuses on the vessel, and surface patterns.AIM To determine the diagnostic efficacy of each category of the JNET and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of each category of the JNET and Pit pattern classifications were calculated.RESULTS A total of 19227 colorectal lesions in 31 studies were included. The diagnostic performance of the JNET classification was equivalent to the Pit pattern classification in each corresponding category. The pooled sensitivity, specificity,and area under the curve(AUC) for each category of the JNET classification were as follows: 0.73(95%CI: 0.55-0.85), 0.99(95%CI: 0.97-1.00), and 0.97(95%CI: 0.95-0.98), respectively, for Type 1;0.88(95%CI: 0.78-0.94), 0.72(95%CI: 0.64-0.79), and 0.84(95%CI: 0.81-0.87), respectively, for Type 2 A;0.56(95%CI: 0.47-0.64), 0.91(95%CI: 0.79-0.96), and 0.72(95%CI: 0.68-0.76), respectively, for Type 2 B;0.51(95%CI: 0.42-0.61), 1.00(95%CI: 1.00-1.00), and 0.90(95%CI: 0.87-0.93), respectively, for Type 3.CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that the diagnostic efficacy of the JNET classification may be equivalent to that of the Pit pattern classification. However, due to its simpler and clearer clinical application, the JNET classification should be promoted for the classification of colorectal lesions, and to guide the treatment strategy.
