Rumors are a type of false information, a consequence of an asymmetrical informational structure. This paper focuses on the social mechanisms of rumor fulfilling. Rumors with important contents related to people’s pe...Rumors are a type of false information, a consequence of an asymmetrical informational structure. This paper focuses on the social mechanisms of rumor fulfilling. Rumors with important contents related to people’s personal interests win acceptance through changing people’s expected payoffs, misleading people to the belief that acceptance of the rumor would beneficially outperform rejection of it. Nevertheless, it is risky to believe rumors; therefore, people make their decision whether to believe a rumor or not by referring to other people’s choices. An analysis was performed first within a game model that incorporated the variables of an individual’s expectancy and other people’s impact to predict whether the individual would accept or reject a rumor. Another analysis followed to further examine the functions of some dynamic mechanisms in rumor fulfilling when group pressure and network effects were introduced. Finally, an exploratory discussion on how to prevent rumors and erase their effects via information management strategies was presented.展开更多
目的：研制开发流程管理与质量保证功能一体化的肿瘤放疗信息网络管理系统并评估其临床应用价值。方法基于放疗流程和质量保证、质量控制的要求，以客户－服务器端（ C－S）模式，采用SQL SERVER 2008数据库结构和国际标准DICOM 3．0、D...目的：研制开发流程管理与质量保证功能一体化的肿瘤放疗信息网络管理系统并评估其临床应用价值。方法基于放疗流程和质量保证、质量控制的要求，以客户－服务器端（ C－S）模式，采用SQL SERVER 2008数据库结构和国际标准DICOM 3．0、DICOM RT及HL7协议，通过局域网络系统硬件和自研发软件，搭建放疗信息网络管理系统，并通过临床测试评价系统的运行性能。结果开发了统一界面的交互式一体化管理系统平台与客户端应用功能模块；研发了安全可靠的标准化数据接口，可与主流厂商加速器、治疗计划系统以及医院信息系统等连接使用；完成了放疗流程管理和质量保证管理模块的设计与开发；通过了系统运行前测试并在临床科室上线使用近3年，证实了系统运行安全稳定并实现了系统设计的全部功能。结论一体化管理系统可以满足肿瘤放疗信息数据的应用管理需求，提高了放疗科整体工作效率和质量保证与质量控制水平，可作为肿瘤放疗科工作的良好工具进行推广应用。展开更多
文摘Rumors are a type of false information, a consequence of an asymmetrical informational structure. This paper focuses on the social mechanisms of rumor fulfilling. Rumors with important contents related to people’s personal interests win acceptance through changing people’s expected payoffs, misleading people to the belief that acceptance of the rumor would beneficially outperform rejection of it. Nevertheless, it is risky to believe rumors; therefore, people make their decision whether to believe a rumor or not by referring to other people’s choices. An analysis was performed first within a game model that incorporated the variables of an individual’s expectancy and other people’s impact to predict whether the individual would accept or reject a rumor. Another analysis followed to further examine the functions of some dynamic mechanisms in rumor fulfilling when group pressure and network effects were introduced. Finally, an exploratory discussion on how to prevent rumors and erase their effects via information management strategies was presented.
