While debate continues as to which is the best surgical method for the treatment of hemorrhoids, none of the currently available surgical methods approach the ideal surgical option, which is one that is effective whil...While debate continues as to which is the best surgical method for the treatment of hemorrhoids, none of the currently available surgical methods approach the ideal surgical option, which is one that is effective while being safe and painless. In reality, the less painful the procedure, the more likely it is to be associated with recurrence post-op. Where hemorrhoids surgery is concerned, there isn’t a “one size fits all” option. Most of the randomized controlled trials performed to date include hemorrhoids of various grades and with a focus on only comparing surgical methods while failing to stratify the outcomes according to the grade of hemorrhoid. We believe that surgery needs to be tailored not only to the grade of the hemorrhoids, but also to the size, circumferential nature of the disease, and prevailing symptomatology.展开更多
背景与目的：近年来，随着技术发展，越来越多的基于能量传递的止血工具广泛问世并应用于开放性外科手术中。超声刀Focus刀头（Harmonic Focus，HF）及Ligasure Small Jaw刀头（LSJ）都是专为开放性甲状腺手术量身定做的。本文拟对北京...背景与目的：近年来，随着技术发展，越来越多的基于能量传递的止血工具广泛问世并应用于开放性外科手术中。超声刀Focus刀头（Harmonic Focus，HF）及Ligasure Small Jaw刀头（LSJ）都是专为开放性甲状腺手术量身定做的。本文拟对北京协和医学院中国医学科学院肿瘤医院HF及LSJ完成的开放性甲状腺手术患者的临床资料进行病例对照分析，以期比较HF及LSJ在开放性甲状腺手术中的应用效果。探讨HF及LSJ用于开放性甲状腺手术的有效性及安全性。方法：选取本院过去1年内甲状腺癌初治患者，由同一外科医师主刀使用HF或LSJ完成甲状腺全切除＋中央区清扫术，纳入HF组100例，LSJ组104例。通过比较两组手术时间及术后第1天引流量，比较两者在甲状腺手术中应用的有效性。通过比较两组术后并发症来评估安全性。结果：有效性：HF组平均手术时间为（95．8±18．0）min，LSJ组平均手术时间为（97．8±19．1）min，差异无统计学意义（P=-0．363）；术后首日引流量HF组为（35．2±20．3）mL，LSJ组为（36．3±23．8）mL，差异无统计学意义（P=0．977）。安全性：HF组出现暂时性声带麻痹者1例（1．0％），LSJ组术后伤口出现术区血肿者1例（1．0％）；暂时I生甲状旁腺功能低下者HF组18例（18．O％），LSJ组16例（15．4％）；HF组术后首日甲状旁腺素平均下降（12．3±12．8）pg／mL，LSJ组平均下降（13．9±13．4）μg／mL；血清离子钙HF组平均下降（0．20±0．13）mg／dL，LSJ组平均下降（0．20±0．16）mg／dL，差异均无统计学意义（P均〉0．05）。结论：HF及LSJ在开放性甲状腺手术中均安全、有效，手术并发症相当。展开更多
AIM: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane...AIM: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index updated to December 2012, were searched. The main outcomes measured were operating time, early postoperative pain, postoperative urinary retention and bleeding, wound problems, gas or fecal incontinence, anal stenosis, length of hospital stay, residual skin tags, prolapse, and recurrence. The meta-analysis was performed using the free software Review Manager. Differences observed between the two groups were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI. A fixedeffects model was used to pool data when statistical heterogeneity was not present. If statistical heterogeneity was present (P < 0.05), a random-effects model was used. RESULTS: The initial search identified 10 publica-tions. After screening, five RCTs published as full articles were included in this meta-analysis. Among the five studies, all described a comparison of the patient baseline characteristics and showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Although most of the analyzed outcomes were similar between the two operative techniques, the operating time for SH was significantly longer than for LH (P < 0.00001; OR= -6.39, 95%CI: -7.68 -5.10). The incidence of residual skin tags and prolapse was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/111 (1.8%) vs 16/105 (15.2%); P = 0.0004; OR= 0.17, 95%CI: 0.06-0.45). The incidence of recurrence after the procedures was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/173 (1.2%) vs 13/174 (7.5%); P = 0.003; OR= 0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.59]. CONCLUSION: Both SH and LH are probably equally valuable techniques in modern hemorrhoid surgery. However, LigaSure might have slightly favorable immediate postoperative results and technical advantages.展开更多
Background Vascular control and tissue dissection are crucial steps in successful laparoscopic surgery. Recently, a new commercially available vessel sealing technology, the LigaSure vessel sealing system （Valleylab,...Background Vascular control and tissue dissection are crucial steps in successful laparoscopic surgery. Recently, a new commercially available vessel sealing technology, the LigaSure vessel sealing system （Valleylab, Boulder, USA）,has been introduced. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefits of the LigaSure in laparoscopic nephrectomy.Methods From January 2005 to March 2010, 170 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed with the LigaSure vessel sealing system, including simple and radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. In a retrospective study, the laparoscopic operating time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative drainage, total amount of postoperative drainage, as well as postoperative hospital stay, were recorded and studied.Results All 170 laparoscopic nephrectomies using LigaSure were accomplished successfully without conversion to open surgery. There was no severe vascular complication or other serious complications. The mean laparoscopic operating time was 124.2 minutes （range, 14-230 minutes）; mean blood loss was 148.6 ml （range, 20-540 ml）; mean time for postoperative drainage was 3.1 days （range, 1-7 days）; mean amount of postoperative drainage was 206.5 ml （range, 27-435 ml） and mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.9 days （range, 3-18 days）.Conclusions Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure appears technically feasible and easy, and produces satisfactory results. The LigaSure provides a safe and fast way to seal vessels and tissue bundles during nephrectomy.展开更多
This study sought to report our 6-year experience with the LigaSure vessel sealing system（LVSS） in videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery（VATS） for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.A series of 180 consecutive patient...This study sought to report our 6-year experience with the LigaSure vessel sealing system（LVSS） in videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery（VATS） for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.A series of 180 consecutive patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax were operated on in our institution from May 2005 to December 2010.Intraoperatively,large lesions（bullae or blebs） with a diameter more than 2 cm were resected by staplers,and the residual lesions were treated by LVSS.LVSS was also used to ablate the apical area when no lesions were found.Conventional apical pleural abrasion was done in all cases.All patients were successfully treated using VATS with minimal perioperative bleeding.The mean operating time was 76 minutes（range,43-160 minutes） for single-side procedures and 169 minutes（range,135-195 minutes） for bilateral procedures,the mean number of applied staples was 1.93 per patient（range,0-8 days）,the duration of drainage was 3.8 days（range,2-15 days）,and the duration of hospital stay was 5.8 days（range,3-16 days）.Postoperative complications included persistent air leak（〉 5 days） in 11 cases（6.1%） and residual pneumothorax in 6（3.3%）.None required reoperation.The mean duration of follow-up was 57 months（range,24-105 months）.Recurrence was seen in three cases（1.7%）,and all underwent another operation thereafter.None of the lesions in the relapse cases received ablation with LVSS in the first operation.LVSS can optimize VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax and reduces the use of single-use staples.The method is safe,easy to use,and cost-effective and produces satisfactory results.展开更多
文摘While debate continues as to which is the best surgical method for the treatment of hemorrhoids, none of the currently available surgical methods approach the ideal surgical option, which is one that is effective while being safe and painless. In reality, the less painful the procedure, the more likely it is to be associated with recurrence post-op. Where hemorrhoids surgery is concerned, there isn’t a “one size fits all” option. Most of the randomized controlled trials performed to date include hemorrhoids of various grades and with a focus on only comparing surgical methods while failing to stratify the outcomes according to the grade of hemorrhoid. We believe that surgery needs to be tailored not only to the grade of the hemorrhoids, but also to the size, circumferential nature of the disease, and prevailing symptomatology.
文摘背景与目的：近年来，随着技术发展，越来越多的基于能量传递的止血工具广泛问世并应用于开放性外科手术中。超声刀Focus刀头（Harmonic Focus，HF）及Ligasure Small Jaw刀头（LSJ）都是专为开放性甲状腺手术量身定做的。本文拟对北京协和医学院中国医学科学院肿瘤医院HF及LSJ完成的开放性甲状腺手术患者的临床资料进行病例对照分析，以期比较HF及LSJ在开放性甲状腺手术中的应用效果。探讨HF及LSJ用于开放性甲状腺手术的有效性及安全性。方法：选取本院过去1年内甲状腺癌初治患者，由同一外科医师主刀使用HF或LSJ完成甲状腺全切除＋中央区清扫术，纳入HF组100例，LSJ组104例。通过比较两组手术时间及术后第1天引流量，比较两者在甲状腺手术中应用的有效性。通过比较两组术后并发症来评估安全性。结果：有效性：HF组平均手术时间为（95．8±18．0）min，LSJ组平均手术时间为（97．8±19．1）min，差异无统计学意义（P=-0．363）；术后首日引流量HF组为（35．2±20．3）mL，LSJ组为（36．3±23．8）mL，差异无统计学意义（P=0．977）。安全性：HF组出现暂时性声带麻痹者1例（1．0％），LSJ组术后伤口出现术区血肿者1例（1．0％）；暂时I生甲状旁腺功能低下者HF组18例（18．O％），LSJ组16例（15．4％）；HF组术后首日甲状旁腺素平均下降（12．3±12．8）pg／mL，LSJ组平均下降（13．9±13．4）μg／mL；血清离子钙HF组平均下降（0．20±0．13）mg／dL，LSJ组平均下降（0．20±0．16）mg／dL，差异均无统计学意义（P均〉0．05）。结论：HF及LSJ在开放性甲状腺手术中均安全、有效，手术并发症相当。
文摘AIM: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index updated to December 2012, were searched. The main outcomes measured were operating time, early postoperative pain, postoperative urinary retention and bleeding, wound problems, gas or fecal incontinence, anal stenosis, length of hospital stay, residual skin tags, prolapse, and recurrence. The meta-analysis was performed using the free software Review Manager. Differences observed between the two groups were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI. A fixedeffects model was used to pool data when statistical heterogeneity was not present. If statistical heterogeneity was present (P < 0.05), a random-effects model was used. RESULTS: The initial search identified 10 publica-tions. After screening, five RCTs published as full articles were included in this meta-analysis. Among the five studies, all described a comparison of the patient baseline characteristics and showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Although most of the analyzed outcomes were similar between the two operative techniques, the operating time for SH was significantly longer than for LH (P < 0.00001; OR= -6.39, 95%CI: -7.68 -5.10). The incidence of residual skin tags and prolapse was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/111 (1.8%) vs 16/105 (15.2%); P = 0.0004; OR= 0.17, 95%CI: 0.06-0.45). The incidence of recurrence after the procedures was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/173 (1.2%) vs 13/174 (7.5%); P = 0.003; OR= 0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.59]. CONCLUSION: Both SH and LH are probably equally valuable techniques in modern hemorrhoid surgery. However, LigaSure might have slightly favorable immediate postoperative results and technical advantages.
文摘Background Vascular control and tissue dissection are crucial steps in successful laparoscopic surgery. Recently, a new commercially available vessel sealing technology, the LigaSure vessel sealing system （Valleylab, Boulder, USA）,has been introduced. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefits of the LigaSure in laparoscopic nephrectomy.Methods From January 2005 to March 2010, 170 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed with the LigaSure vessel sealing system, including simple and radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. In a retrospective study, the laparoscopic operating time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative drainage, total amount of postoperative drainage, as well as postoperative hospital stay, were recorded and studied.Results All 170 laparoscopic nephrectomies using LigaSure were accomplished successfully without conversion to open surgery. There was no severe vascular complication or other serious complications. The mean laparoscopic operating time was 124.2 minutes （range, 14-230 minutes）; mean blood loss was 148.6 ml （range, 20-540 ml）; mean time for postoperative drainage was 3.1 days （range, 1-7 days）; mean amount of postoperative drainage was 206.5 ml （range, 27-435 ml） and mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.9 days （range, 3-18 days）.Conclusions Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure appears technically feasible and easy, and produces satisfactory results. The LigaSure provides a safe and fast way to seal vessels and tissue bundles during nephrectomy.
文摘This study sought to report our 6-year experience with the LigaSure vessel sealing system（LVSS） in videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery（VATS） for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.A series of 180 consecutive patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax were operated on in our institution from May 2005 to December 2010.Intraoperatively,large lesions（bullae or blebs） with a diameter more than 2 cm were resected by staplers,and the residual lesions were treated by LVSS.LVSS was also used to ablate the apical area when no lesions were found.Conventional apical pleural abrasion was done in all cases.All patients were successfully treated using VATS with minimal perioperative bleeding.The mean operating time was 76 minutes（range,43-160 minutes） for single-side procedures and 169 minutes（range,135-195 minutes） for bilateral procedures,the mean number of applied staples was 1.93 per patient（range,0-8 days）,the duration of drainage was 3.8 days（range,2-15 days）,and the duration of hospital stay was 5.8 days（range,3-16 days）.Postoperative complications included persistent air leak（〉 5 days） in 11 cases（6.1%） and residual pneumothorax in 6（3.3%）.None required reoperation.The mean duration of follow-up was 57 months（range,24-105 months）.Recurrence was seen in three cases（1.7%）,and all underwent another operation thereafter.None of the lesions in the relapse cases received ablation with LVSS in the first operation.LVSS can optimize VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax and reduces the use of single-use staples.The method is safe,easy to use,and cost-effective and produces satisfactory results.
