目的比较微型钢板与克氏针内固定治疗指骨骨折的临床效果。方法选取作者医院骨科自2011-01/2012-09月指骨骨折患者86例,分别采用＂T＂型或直微型钢板固定（微型钢板）（钢板置于指骨背侧或侧方）（n=50）或克氏针固定（n=32）治疗,并对...目的比较微型钢板与克氏针内固定治疗指骨骨折的临床效果。方法选取作者医院骨科自2011-01/2012-09月指骨骨折患者86例,分别采用＂T＂型或直微型钢板固定（微型钢板）（钢板置于指骨背侧或侧方）（n=50）或克氏针固定（n=32）治疗,并对其进行随访12~14个月。（对肌腱损伤者均一期修复）术后对手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、手指总主动屈曲度（tatol active flexion,TAF）的评分标准进行样本评估分析。结果微型钢板组在骨折愈合时间、手指总主动屈曲度（tatol active flexion,TAF）方面优于克氏针组,有显著性差异（P〈0.05）;克氏针组在手术时间、术中出血、住院时间上有优势（P〈0.05）。结论微型钢板内固定治疗指骨骨折复位好、固定稳定,术后患指的屈伸功能显著改善。克氏针经济方便又可以在病人软组织条件差或经济条件较差的情况下提供良好的选择。展开更多
Introduction This study investigates the current practice of surgeons in the United Kingdom with regards to their usage of prophylactic antibiotics for percutaneous orthopaedic procedures. Methods An electronic survey...Introduction This study investigates the current practice of surgeons in the United Kingdom with regards to their usage of prophylactic antibiotics for percutaneous orthopaedic procedures. Methods An electronic survey of 10 questions was devised and sent to all members of the British Orthopaedic Association. Three hundred and three replies were obtained (172 consultants, 131 trainees). Results Only half the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons would routinely use antibiotics for percutaneous K-wire fixation. Of the other half, 28% would never prescribe antibiotics and 22% would use them in special circumstances only. These ‘special circumstances’ were also not standardised. 92% of those who did prescribe antibiotics would administer single dose only and the majority (90%) would administer them during induction. There was no significant difference between trainees and consultants or between different orthopaedic procedures with regards to whether prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed or not. Discussion This survey highlights the split of opinion amongst practising orthopaedic surgeons as to the necessity or otherwise of antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous orthopaedic procedures. There are no reliable guidelines and further work should be carried out to investigate this subject.展开更多
目的探讨双克氏针经基底髓内交叉固定治疗近节指骨关节外骨折的效果。方法回顾性分析2016年5月—2018年5月哈尔滨市第五医院骨科收治的22例(23指)近节指骨关节外骨折患者,男性18例,女性4例;年龄18~50岁,平均35.4岁。致伤原因:摔伤5例,...目的探讨双克氏针经基底髓内交叉固定治疗近节指骨关节外骨折的效果。方法回顾性分析2016年5月—2018年5月哈尔滨市第五医院骨科收治的22例(23指)近节指骨关节外骨折患者,男性18例,女性4例;年龄18~50岁,平均35.4岁。致伤原因:摔伤5例,暴力扭伤5例,压砸伤4例,击打伤8例。伤指分布:示指9指,中指6指,环指3指,小指5指。伤后至手术时间1~4d,平均2.3d。均臂丛麻醉下行闭合复位双克氏针经基底交叉固定治疗,术后复查手指正侧位X线片,术后第2天在专业康复师指导下开始功能练习,术后每4周复查手指正侧位X线片。统计分析手术时间、骨折愈合时间、患指掌指关节活动度,患指屈伸活动按照手指总主动活动度(total active motion,TAM)评价。结果手术时间30~42min,平均38.6min;术后无针道感染、克氏针变形、断裂发生。患者均获4~9个月门诊随访,平均5.7个月;骨折临床愈合时间(8.95±3.38)周;拔除克氏针后1周,患指掌指关节活动度为81°~89°,平均87.5°;TAM为243°~278°,平均265.4°,均为优。结论采用闭合复位双克氏针经基底髓内交叉固定治疗近节指骨关节外闭合骨折,手术操作简单、损伤小、固定可靠,患指可早期功能练习,预后好。展开更多
目的掌指骨骨折是手外科常见创伤性疾病,掌指骨参与腕掌、掌指、指间关节的构成,治疗不当将严重影响患者的手的功能。文中探讨微型钢板、穿髓克氏针固定、牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法在掌指骨骨折治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取掌指骨骨...目的掌指骨骨折是手外科常见创伤性疾病,掌指骨参与腕掌、掌指、指间关节的构成,治疗不当将严重影响患者的手的功能。文中探讨微型钢板、穿髓克氏针固定、牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法在掌指骨骨折治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取掌指骨骨折患者60例共95个部位,分别平均进入微型钢板内固定、穿髓克氏针固定及牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法组,术后随访6～12个月,平均随访(8.1±1.5)个月,按照总主动屈曲度系统(total active flexion system,TAFS)评分评估3组临床疗效。结果微型钢板组内固定优良率为90.9%,穿髓克氏针内固定组优良率为71.4%,牵引位石膏保守治疗组优良率为55.6%,3组结果差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨折愈合时间微型钢板组较其他2组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。切开复位感染率微型钢板内固定组为0.0%,穿髓克氏针组为15.4%(P<0.05)。结论微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折在术后关节功能恢复、骨折愈合时间、术后感染预防方面都具有明显优势,是首选的治疗方法。展开更多
This meta-analysis compared the therapeutic effect of cable pin system（CPS） with K-wire tension band（KTB） in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. The databases of PubM ed, Cochrane libr...This meta-analysis compared the therapeutic effect of cable pin system（CPS） with K-wire tension band（KTB） in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. The databases of PubM ed, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI）, Chinese Wan Fang and Chinese VIP were searched for studies on CPS versus KTB in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. Literatures were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed, and meta-analysis was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration＇s REVMAN 5.3 software. A total of 932 patients from 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis（426 fractures treated with CPS and 506 fractures treated with KTB）. There were significant differences in duration of hospital stay [mean difference（MD）=–1.07; 95% confidence interval（CI）： –1.71 to –0.43], fracture healing time（MD=–1.23; 95% CI： –1.68 to –0.77）, flexion degree of knee joint at 6 th month after operation（MD=14.82; 95% CI： 10.93 to 18.71）, incidence of postoperative complication [risk ratio（RR）=0.16; 95% CI： 0.09 to 0.27] and excellent-good rate of B？stman score（RR=1.09; 95% CI： 1.03 to 1.16） between the CPS group and KTB group, while no significant difference was found in operative time between the two groups（MD=–4.52; 95% CI： –11.70 to 2.67）. For the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population, limited evidence suggests that the CPS is more suitable than the KTB when considering the hospital stay, fracture healing time, flexion degree of knee at 6 th month after operation, incidence of postoperative complication and excellent-good rate of B？stman joint score. Due to the limitation of high quality evidence and sample size, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the findings in the future.展开更多
文摘目的比较微型钢板与克氏针内固定治疗指骨骨折的临床效果。方法选取作者医院骨科自2011-01/2012-09月指骨骨折患者86例,分别采用＂T＂型或直微型钢板固定（微型钢板）（钢板置于指骨背侧或侧方）（n=50）或克氏针固定（n=32）治疗,并对其进行随访12~14个月。（对肌腱损伤者均一期修复）术后对手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、手指总主动屈曲度（tatol active flexion,TAF）的评分标准进行样本评估分析。结果微型钢板组在骨折愈合时间、手指总主动屈曲度（tatol active flexion,TAF）方面优于克氏针组,有显著性差异（P〈0.05）;克氏针组在手术时间、术中出血、住院时间上有优势（P〈0.05）。结论微型钢板内固定治疗指骨骨折复位好、固定稳定,术后患指的屈伸功能显著改善。克氏针经济方便又可以在病人软组织条件差或经济条件较差的情况下提供良好的选择。
文摘Introduction This study investigates the current practice of surgeons in the United Kingdom with regards to their usage of prophylactic antibiotics for percutaneous orthopaedic procedures. Methods An electronic survey of 10 questions was devised and sent to all members of the British Orthopaedic Association. Three hundred and three replies were obtained (172 consultants, 131 trainees). Results Only half the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons would routinely use antibiotics for percutaneous K-wire fixation. Of the other half, 28% would never prescribe antibiotics and 22% would use them in special circumstances only. These ‘special circumstances’ were also not standardised. 92% of those who did prescribe antibiotics would administer single dose only and the majority (90%) would administer them during induction. There was no significant difference between trainees and consultants or between different orthopaedic procedures with regards to whether prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed or not. Discussion This survey highlights the split of opinion amongst practising orthopaedic surgeons as to the necessity or otherwise of antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous orthopaedic procedures. There are no reliable guidelines and further work should be carried out to investigate this subject.
文摘目的探讨双克氏针经基底髓内交叉固定治疗近节指骨关节外骨折的效果。方法回顾性分析2016年5月—2018年5月哈尔滨市第五医院骨科收治的22例(23指)近节指骨关节外骨折患者,男性18例,女性4例;年龄18~50岁,平均35.4岁。致伤原因:摔伤5例,暴力扭伤5例,压砸伤4例,击打伤8例。伤指分布:示指9指,中指6指,环指3指,小指5指。伤后至手术时间1~4d,平均2.3d。均臂丛麻醉下行闭合复位双克氏针经基底交叉固定治疗,术后复查手指正侧位X线片,术后第2天在专业康复师指导下开始功能练习,术后每4周复查手指正侧位X线片。统计分析手术时间、骨折愈合时间、患指掌指关节活动度,患指屈伸活动按照手指总主动活动度(total active motion,TAM)评价。结果手术时间30~42min,平均38.6min;术后无针道感染、克氏针变形、断裂发生。患者均获4~9个月门诊随访,平均5.7个月;骨折临床愈合时间(8.95±3.38)周;拔除克氏针后1周,患指掌指关节活动度为81°~89°,平均87.5°;TAM为243°~278°,平均265.4°,均为优。结论采用闭合复位双克氏针经基底髓内交叉固定治疗近节指骨关节外闭合骨折,手术操作简单、损伤小、固定可靠,患指可早期功能练习,预后好。
文摘目的探讨闭合复位克氏针髓内固定治疗移位掌骨干骨折的手术效果。方法 2005年1月至2010年8月,我院对采用闭合复位克氏针髓内固定治疗移位掌骨干骨折并获得随访患者38例（49指）,男24例,女14例,年龄20-47岁,平均31.2岁。单发骨折30例,多发骨折8例,此38例均为闭合性损伤,骨折类型：均为移位的非粉碎性（A、B型）掌骨干。术后第2天开始手指功能锻炼。结果 38例患者随访6-12个月,平均8个月,38例患者伤口均一期愈合;骨性愈合时间平均为8周（6~10周）。按照手指总主动活动度（total active motion,TAM）评定,优32例（36指）,良4例（8指）,中2例（5指）,优良率为94.7%。结论闭合复位克氏针髓内固定是治疗非粉碎性移位掌骨干骨折的一种简单有效的治疗方法,可行早期功能锻炼以恢复手指功能。
文摘目的掌指骨骨折是手外科常见创伤性疾病,掌指骨参与腕掌、掌指、指间关节的构成,治疗不当将严重影响患者的手的功能。文中探讨微型钢板、穿髓克氏针固定、牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法在掌指骨骨折治疗中的临床疗效。方法选取掌指骨骨折患者60例共95个部位,分别平均进入微型钢板内固定、穿髓克氏针固定及牵引位石膏托3种不同治疗方法组,术后随访6～12个月,平均随访(8.1±1.5)个月,按照总主动屈曲度系统(total active flexion system,TAFS)评分评估3组临床疗效。结果微型钢板组内固定优良率为90.9%,穿髓克氏针内固定组优良率为71.4%,牵引位石膏保守治疗组优良率为55.6%,3组结果差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨折愈合时间微型钢板组较其他2组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。切开复位感染率微型钢板内固定组为0.0%,穿髓克氏针组为15.4%(P<0.05)。结论微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折在术后关节功能恢复、骨折愈合时间、术后感染预防方面都具有明显优势,是首选的治疗方法。
文摘This meta-analysis compared the therapeutic effect of cable pin system（CPS） with K-wire tension band（KTB） in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. The databases of PubM ed, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI）, Chinese Wan Fang and Chinese VIP were searched for studies on CPS versus KTB in the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population. Literatures were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed, and meta-analysis was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration＇s REVMAN 5.3 software. A total of 932 patients from 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis（426 fractures treated with CPS and 506 fractures treated with KTB）. There were significant differences in duration of hospital stay [mean difference（MD）=–1.07; 95% confidence interval（CI）： –1.71 to –0.43], fracture healing time（MD=–1.23; 95% CI： –1.68 to –0.77）, flexion degree of knee joint at 6 th month after operation（MD=14.82; 95% CI： 10.93 to 18.71）, incidence of postoperative complication [risk ratio（RR）=0.16; 95% CI： 0.09 to 0.27] and excellent-good rate of B？stman score（RR=1.09; 95% CI： 1.03 to 1.16） between the CPS group and KTB group, while no significant difference was found in operative time between the two groups（MD=–4.52; 95% CI： –11.70 to 2.67）. For the treatment of patella fractures among Chinese Han population, limited evidence suggests that the CPS is more suitable than the KTB when considering the hospital stay, fracture healing time, flexion degree of knee at 6 th month after operation, incidence of postoperative complication and excellent-good rate of B？stman joint score. Due to the limitation of high quality evidence and sample size, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the findings in the future.
