Objective:To evaluate psychometric properties of the Index of Well-being in a sample of Chinese college students. Methods: A total of 629 subjects were administered the Index of Well-being, State-Trait Anxiety Invento...Objective:To evaluate psychometric properties of the Index of Well-being in a sample of Chinese college students. Methods: A total of 629 subjects were administered the Index of Well-being, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Symptom Checklist-90. Results: Significant gender difference was found on the index of well-being. There was also significant correlation between index of well-being and negative emotionality. Index of Well-being was negatively correlated with factor scores of emotionality including state anxiety, trait anxiety, and SCl-90-depression. Conclusion:The "Index of Well-being”is psychometrically sound for application to Chinese college students.展开更多
目的:调查不同治疗阶段乳腺癌患者的焦虑、抑郁、幸福感指数和社会支持情况,分析社会支持与情绪状况的关系。方法:收集术前组、术后组与康复组的乳腺癌患者各105例为病例组,以及年龄与教育年限匹配的健康对照105例,应用汉密顿焦虑量表(H...目的:调查不同治疗阶段乳腺癌患者的焦虑、抑郁、幸福感指数和社会支持情况,分析社会支持与情绪状况的关系。方法:收集术前组、术后组与康复组的乳腺癌患者各105例为病例组,以及年龄与教育年限匹配的健康对照105例,应用汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA,≥8分为可疑焦虑)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD,≥8分为可疑抑郁)、幸福感指数量表(Index of Well-being)和领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)进行有关测评。结果:病例组的可疑焦虑、抑郁发生率均高于健康对照(42.9%,61.9%,59.0%vs.9.5%;33.3%,60.0%,46.7%vs.5.7%;均P<0.01),病例组的HAM A、HAM D得分均高于健康对照[(7.2±4.3),(9.4±5.1),(9.2±5.6)vs.(3.9±3.1);(6.2±3.8),(9.2±4.8),(7.9±4.6)vs.(3.1±2.4),均P<0.01];术前组与术后组的幸福感指数低于健康对照[(10.6±2.3),(10.5±2.6)vs.(11.5±2.2),均P<0.01]。病例组中,有可疑焦虑患者的幸福感指数、PSSS得分均低于无焦虑组[如,术后组PSSS得分(63.0±10.1)vs.(70.4±9.1),P<0.01];有可疑抑郁患者的幸福感指数、PSSS得分低于无抑郁组[如,康复组PSSS得分(63.8±10.6)vs.(70.1±8.4),P<0.01]。结论:本研究提示,不同治疗阶段的乳腺癌患者的可疑焦虑、抑郁发生率和焦虑、抑郁得分均高于健康人群;有可疑焦虑、抑郁患者的幸福感指数和社会支持相对更低。展开更多
目的探讨大学生生命意义感与父母教养方式、应对方式、幸福感指数的关系。方法采用生命意义感量表(PIL)、简式父母教养方式问卷(S-EMBU)、简易应对方式量表(SCSS)、幸福感指数量表(Index of Well-Being),对569名大学生团体施测。结果 1...目的探讨大学生生命意义感与父母教养方式、应对方式、幸福感指数的关系。方法采用生命意义感量表(PIL)、简式父母教养方式问卷(S-EMBU)、简易应对方式量表(SCSS)、幸福感指数量表(Index of Well-Being),对569名大学生团体施测。结果 1大学生生命意义感与父母情感温暖、积极应对、幸福感指数正相关(r=0.401,0.416,0.404,0.661;P<0.01);2多元逐步回归分析表明,幸福感指数、母亲情感温暖、积极应对正向预测大学生生命意义感(R2=0.542,P<0.001);3幸福感指数、积极应对方式分别在母亲情感温暖与大学生生命意义感间起部分中介作用。结论母亲情感温暖不仅直接预测生命意义感,还通过幸福感指数、积极应对方式间接预测生命意义感。展开更多
文摘Objective:To evaluate psychometric properties of the Index of Well-being in a sample of Chinese college students. Methods: A total of 629 subjects were administered the Index of Well-being, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Symptom Checklist-90. Results: Significant gender difference was found on the index of well-being. There was also significant correlation between index of well-being and negative emotionality. Index of Well-being was negatively correlated with factor scores of emotionality including state anxiety, trait anxiety, and SCl-90-depression. Conclusion:The "Index of Well-being”is psychometrically sound for application to Chinese college students.
文摘目的:调查不同治疗阶段乳腺癌患者的焦虑、抑郁、幸福感指数和社会支持情况,分析社会支持与情绪状况的关系。方法:收集术前组、术后组与康复组的乳腺癌患者各105例为病例组,以及年龄与教育年限匹配的健康对照105例,应用汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA,≥8分为可疑焦虑)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD,≥8分为可疑抑郁)、幸福感指数量表(Index of Well-being)和领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)进行有关测评。结果:病例组的可疑焦虑、抑郁发生率均高于健康对照(42.9%,61.9%,59.0%vs.9.5%;33.3%,60.0%,46.7%vs.5.7%;均P<0.01),病例组的HAM A、HAM D得分均高于健康对照[(7.2±4.3),(9.4±5.1),(9.2±5.6)vs.(3.9±3.1);(6.2±3.8),(9.2±4.8),(7.9±4.6)vs.(3.1±2.4),均P<0.01];术前组与术后组的幸福感指数低于健康对照[(10.6±2.3),(10.5±2.6)vs.(11.5±2.2),均P<0.01]。病例组中,有可疑焦虑患者的幸福感指数、PSSS得分均低于无焦虑组[如,术后组PSSS得分(63.0±10.1)vs.(70.4±9.1),P<0.01];有可疑抑郁患者的幸福感指数、PSSS得分低于无抑郁组[如,康复组PSSS得分(63.8±10.6)vs.(70.1±8.4),P<0.01]。结论:本研究提示,不同治疗阶段的乳腺癌患者的可疑焦虑、抑郁发生率和焦虑、抑郁得分均高于健康人群;有可疑焦虑、抑郁患者的幸福感指数和社会支持相对更低。
文摘目的探讨大学生生命意义感与父母教养方式、应对方式、幸福感指数的关系。方法采用生命意义感量表(PIL)、简式父母教养方式问卷(S-EMBU)、简易应对方式量表(SCSS)、幸福感指数量表(Index of Well-Being),对569名大学生团体施测。结果 1大学生生命意义感与父母情感温暖、积极应对、幸福感指数正相关(r=0.401,0.416,0.404,0.661;P<0.01);2多元逐步回归分析表明,幸福感指数、母亲情感温暖、积极应对正向预测大学生生命意义感(R2=0.542,P<0.001);3幸福感指数、积极应对方式分别在母亲情感温暖与大学生生命意义感间起部分中介作用。结论母亲情感温暖不仅直接预测生命意义感,还通过幸福感指数、积极应对方式间接预测生命意义感。
