期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior tumors using caudal approach and postural changes: A new technical approach 被引量:20
1
作者 Zenichi Morise 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第47期10267-10274,共8页
Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) for tumors in the posterosuperior liver [segment(S) 7 and deep S6] is a challenging clinical procedure. This area is located in the bottom of the small subphrenic space(rib cage), wit... Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) for tumors in the posterosuperior liver [segment(S) 7 and deep S6] is a challenging clinical procedure. This area is located in the bottom of the small subphrenic space(rib cage), with the large and heavy right liver on it when the patient is in the supine position. Thus, LLR of this area is technically demanding because of the handling of the right liver which is necessary to obtain a fine surgical view, secure hemostasis and conduct the resection so as to achieve an appropriate surgical margin in the cage. Handling of the right liver may be performed by the hand-assisted approach, robotic liver resection or by using spacers, such as a sterile glove pouch. In addition, the operative field of posterosuperior resection is in the deep bottom area of the subphrenic cage, with the liver S6 obstructing the laparoscopic caudal view of lesions. The use of intercostal ports facilitates the direct lateral approach into the cage and to the target area, with the combination of mobilization of the liver. Postural changes during the LLR procedure have also been reported to facilitate the LLR for this area, such as left lateral positioning for posterior sectionectomy and semi-prone positioning for tumors in the posterosuperior segments. In our hospital, LLR procedures for posterosuperior tumors are performed via the caudal approach with postural changes. The left lateral position is used for posterior sectionectomy and the semi-prone position is used for S7 segmentectomy and partial resections of S7 and deep S6 without combined intercostal ports insertion. Although the movement of instruments is restricted in the caudal approach, compared to the lateral approach, port placement in the para-vertebra area makes the manipulation feasible and stable, with minimum damage to the environment around the liver. 展开更多
关键词 hepatectomy laparoscopic surgery Liver cancer POSTURE Prone position
下载PDF
First quarter century of laparoscopic liver resection 被引量:17
2
作者 Zenichi Morise Go Wakabayashi 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2017年第20期3581-3588,共8页
The beginnings of laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)were at the start of the 1990s,with the initial reports being published in 1991 and 1992.These were followed by reports of left lateral sectionectomy in 1996.In the y... The beginnings of laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)were at the start of the 1990s,with the initial reports being published in 1991 and 1992.These were followed by reports of left lateral sectionectomy in 1996.In the years following,the procedures of LLR were expanded to hemi-hepatectomy,sectionectomy,segmentectomy and partial resection of posterosuperior segments,as well as the parenchymal preserving limited anatomical resection and modified anatomical(extended and/or combining limited)resection procedures.This expanded range of LLR procedures,mimicking the expansion of open liver resection in the past,was related to advances in both technology(instrumentation)and technical skill with conceptual changes.During this period of remarkable development,two international consensus conferences were held(2008 in Louisville,KY,United States,and 2014 in Morioka,Japan),providing up-to-date summarizations of the status and perspective of LLR.The advantages of LLR have become clear,and include reduced intraoperative bleeding,shorter hospital stay,and-especially for cirrhotic patients-lower incidence of complications(e.g.,postoperative ascites and liver failure).In this paper,we review and discuss the developments of LLR in operative procedures(extent and style of liver resections)during the first quarter century since its inception,from the aspect of relationships with technological/technical developments with conceptual changes. 展开更多
关键词 hepatectomy laparoscopic surgery Liver cancer HISTORY Technology Technique Concept Approach POSTURE Simulation
下载PDF
腔镜下小范围切肝结合胆道扩张支撑术治疗左肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎的效果及对应激反应、肝胆功能的影响 被引量:1
3
作者 刘磊 楚兴 陈宏 《临床医学研究与实践》 2022年第30期64-67,共4页
目的探讨腔镜下小范围切肝结合胆道扩张支撑术治疗左肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎的效果,以为临床手术方式的选择提供参考。方法选择2017年11月至2020年12月我院收治的84例左肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方案的不同将其... 目的探讨腔镜下小范围切肝结合胆道扩张支撑术治疗左肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎的效果,以为临床手术方式的选择提供参考。方法选择2017年11月至2020年12月我院收治的84例左肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方案的不同将其分为对照组和观察组,各42例。对照组采取腔镜下左半肝切除术,观察组采取腔镜下小范围切肝结合胆道扩张支撑术。比较两组的治疗效果。结果观察组的术中出血量少于对照组,下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后24 h,观察组的去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(Cor)、前列腺素E2(PGE2)水平低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后7 d,观察组的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、总胆红素(TBIL)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)水平低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后7 d,观察组的生理、心理、环境、社会关系评分高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腔镜下小范围切肝结合胆道扩张支撑术治疗左肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎的效果较好,可减轻应激反应,促进肝胆功能恢复,提高生活质量,值得推广。 展开更多
关键词 腔镜下小范围切肝 胆道扩张支撑术 左肝内外胆管结石伴胆管炎 肛门排气时间 应激反应 肝胆功能 生活质量
下载PDF
肝内胆管结石的完全腹腔镜下肝切除术 被引量:19
4
作者 韩高雄 陶凯雄 +4 位作者 蔡开琳 帅晓明 王继亮 夏泽锋 王国斌 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期652-654,共3页
目的 总结肝内胆管结石完全腹腔镜下肝切除术的临床经验.方法 回顾性分析2005年7月至2009年4月间华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院腹腔镜外科中心因肝内胆管结石而施行了完全腹腔镜下肝切除术的72例病人临床资料.结果 病人年龄16~65... 目的 总结肝内胆管结石完全腹腔镜下肝切除术的临床经验.方法 回顾性分析2005年7月至2009年4月间华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院腹腔镜外科中心因肝内胆管结石而施行了完全腹腔镜下肝切除术的72例病人临床资料.结果 病人年龄16~65岁,平均(43.8±21.7)岁.72例腹腔镜下肝叶或肝段切除术主要包括左半肝切除术34例,左外叶切除术19例,肝Ⅵ段切除术16例.手术时间125~320 min,平均(262.5±115.5)min.出血量50~400 ml,中位数150 ml.术后并发症发生率12.50%,包括胆漏6例,胃轻瘫1例,术后早期炎性肠梗阻1例,肝包膜下积液1例,均保守治疗成功.结论 微创时代治疗肝内胆管结石应以腹腔镜下肝段或肝叶切除术作为主要方式. 展开更多
关键词 胆结石 肝切除术 腹腔镜
原文传递
腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肝癌的临床对比 被引量:11
5
作者 陈小勋 黄顺荣 +2 位作者 林源 吴瑞正 周永醇 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期729-733,共5页
目的 探讨腹腔镜肝切除术(laparoscopic hepatectomy,LH)在治疗肝癌中的临床价值.方法 分析2002年1月至2007年12月86例肝癌患者的临床资料,按手术方式不同分为LH组、开腹肝切除术(open hepatectomy,OH)组.结果 86例中LH组36例、OH... 目的 探讨腹腔镜肝切除术(laparoscopic hepatectomy,LH)在治疗肝癌中的临床价值.方法 分析2002年1月至2007年12月86例肝癌患者的临床资料,按手术方式不同分为LH组、开腹肝切除术(open hepatectomy,OH)组.结果 86例中LH组36例、OH组50例.两组在切口长度、术中出血量、进食时间、术后住院天数、止痛药使用比较差异有统计学意义(分别t=-37.608、-2.396、-13.073、-4.283、x2=35.765,均P<0.05),LH组优于OH组 术后第1、3天两组血清ALT、AST、ALP、r-GT、LDH及术后第5天凝血酶原时间、白蛋白改变比较差异有统计学意义(统计值分别为-3.465、-3.236、-3.470、-6.812、-4.837和-3.998、-2.894、-4.286、-7.887、-5.388、6.131、7.292,均P<0.05) 术后第5天ALT、AST、ALP、r-GT及术后第1、5天TBIL值比较差异有统计学意义(分别t=-4.795、-2.155、-3.442、-4.194、-2.712、-1.600,均P<0.05),OH组高于LH组.手术时间、切除方式、总并发症及1年和3年生存率、无瘤生存率相比差异无统计学意义(t=-0.893,分别x2=0.066,0.026,0.468,0.156,0.106,2.732,均P>0.05),LH组术后3年无瘤生存率50.0%,OH组为25%(x2=2.732,P=0.098).结论 LH治疗肝癌是安全的且近期疗效优于OH,远期疗效无差异. 展开更多
关键词 肝细胞 肝切除术 腹腔镜
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部