文中发展了由Tinti et a1.(1985)提出的一种判断地震目录不完全性的方法。它由三步组成:余震和震群的剔除,相对完全性的识别以及绝对完全性的计算。假定经过剔除余震和震群后理想化(即没有任何地震从目录中遗漏)的地震目录是一个稳态随...文中发展了由Tinti et a1.(1985)提出的一种判断地震目录不完全性的方法。它由三步组成:余震和震群的剔除,相对完全性的识别以及绝对完全性的计算。假定经过剔除余震和震群后理想化(即没有任何地震从目录中遗漏)的地震目录是一个稳态随机泊松过程,而对于实际的目录,通过拟合检验,将目录分成一组时间区段,每个区段是相对完全的,并具有不同的地震发生率。如果目录中至少有一区段被认为是绝对完全的,那么真实的地震发生率通过统计修补可以得到。该方法被应用到估计华北地区地震发生的概率密度。展开更多
The historical earthquake catalogue of China has lasted more than 3000 years,and most of its data are inferred from historical records.The earthquake catalogue in earlier times is not complete owing to various reasons...The historical earthquake catalogue of China has lasted more than 3000 years,and most of its data are inferred from historical records.The earthquake catalogue in earlier times is not complete owing to various reasons,so some events are lost.This paper estimates the loss rate of earthquakes with various magnitudes in the historical earthquake catalogue for different time intervals quantitatively by using the Gutenberg-Richter formula and modern instrumental records,which will provide the references for statistic research in seismicity.展开更多
文摘文中发展了由Tinti et a1.(1985)提出的一种判断地震目录不完全性的方法。它由三步组成:余震和震群的剔除,相对完全性的识别以及绝对完全性的计算。假定经过剔除余震和震群后理想化(即没有任何地震从目录中遗漏)的地震目录是一个稳态随机泊松过程,而对于实际的目录,通过拟合检验,将目录分成一组时间区段,每个区段是相对完全的,并具有不同的地震发生率。如果目录中至少有一区段被认为是绝对完全的,那么真实的地震发生率通过统计修补可以得到。该方法被应用到估计华北地区地震发生的概率密度。
文摘The historical earthquake catalogue of China has lasted more than 3000 years,and most of its data are inferred from historical records.The earthquake catalogue in earlier times is not complete owing to various reasons,so some events are lost.This paper estimates the loss rate of earthquakes with various magnitudes in the historical earthquake catalogue for different time intervals quantitatively by using the Gutenberg-Richter formula and modern instrumental records,which will provide the references for statistic research in seismicity.
