【目的】对我国中文医学期刊在PubMed数据库中的收录及数据展示现状进行分析,为进一步提高期刊国际影响力提供参考。【方法】检索PubMed数据库中收录的中文医学期刊,对其基本信息、PubMed收录时间及在PubMed上的展示现状(数据更新时间...【目的】对我国中文医学期刊在PubMed数据库中的收录及数据展示现状进行分析,为进一步提高期刊国际影响力提供参考。【方法】检索PubMed数据库中收录的中文医学期刊,对其基本信息、PubMed收录时间及在PubMed上的展示现状(数据更新时间、摘要语种、DOI和全文链接)进行分析,并探讨中文医学期刊与国际高影响力期刊(CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians)在数据展示方面的差异。【结果】PubMed收录的中文医学期刊以月刊居多,收录高峰期为1997年,2008年后逐渐减少;其中,35种PubMed收录期刊对文献数据进行了及时更新,25种采用中英双语摘要,32种标注了DOI,27种提供了全文链接。与中文医学期刊相比,CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians的文献均采用了提前在线出版方式。【结论】我国中文医学期刊被PubMed数据库收录的数量较少,而且已被收录的期刊在文献更新速度和内容方面尚需进一步改进。提前在线出版是我国中文医学期刊与国际高影响力期刊在数据展示方面的主要差距。展开更多
【目的】通过《中华医学杂志(英文版)》(Chinese Medical Journal,CMJ;中华医学会会刊)对标《美国医学会杂志》(Journal of the American Medical Association,JAMA;美国医学会会刊)、《加拿大医学会杂志》(Canadian Medical Associatio...【目的】通过《中华医学杂志(英文版)》(Chinese Medical Journal,CMJ;中华医学会会刊)对标《美国医学会杂志》(Journal of the American Medical Association,JAMA;美国医学会会刊)、《加拿大医学会杂志》(Canadian Medical Association Journal,CMAJ;加拿大医学会会刊)、《英国医学杂志》(British Medical Journal,BMJ;英国医学会会刊),探讨缩小CMJ与其他国家医学会会刊差距的对策与措施,为我国一流科技期刊的建设提供参考和借鉴。【方法】利用Web of Science数据库和期刊官网,检索并总结四国医学会会刊的各项指标数据,如影响因子、发文量、总被引频次、期刊引文指标(Journal Citation Indicator,JCI)、辐射范围、作者分布以及尖端论文等。【结果】CMJ的主要引证指标与JAMA、CMAJ、BMJ相比,除发文量外,其他数据差距明显。2016—2020年4种期刊的发文量分别为1590篇、1032篇、458篇和927篇。CMJ的发文量优势明显,分别为对标期刊的1.54倍、3.47倍和1.72倍。2020年4种期刊的总被引频次分别为34344次、687922次、64437次和600100次,即使总被引频次相对较少的CMAJ,其总被引频次也为CMJ的1.88倍。CMJ本国作者的发文比例为91.216%,明显高于JAMA、CMAJ和BMJ的本国作者发文比例(72.407%、76.539%和59.646%)。另外,CMJ的近5年的JCI均小于1,而JAMA、CMAJ和BMJ的JCI分别为11.49,1.84和6.27。【结论】我国科技期刊可通过期刊高质量建设战略,追踪研究热点与重大事件,引领学科发展,同时构建期刊学术生态圈,从而提升期刊的国际传播力与影响力。坚信在相关国家政策的支持下不断调整办刊思路,我国科技期刊一定会实现从跟跑,齐平到超越的伟大迈进。展开更多
Scientific journals are more likely to publish those articles which will be highly cited after theirpublication. To improve the quality and the impact of the Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ）, the distribution of highly...Scientific journals are more likely to publish those articles which will be highly cited after theirpublication. To improve the quality and the impact of the Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ）, the distribution of highly cited articles published in CMJ in 2010 was analyzed and reported in this article.展开更多
为了提高中文医学科技期刊的国际影响力,更好地为广大读者提供日益完善的高质量服务,以《中国肺癌杂志》为例介绍了在Pub Med检索系统使用中文摘要的主要技术方法。分析了此项工作对中文医学科技期刊在扩大期刊影响力、提高为读者服务...为了提高中文医学科技期刊的国际影响力,更好地为广大读者提供日益完善的高质量服务,以《中国肺癌杂志》为例介绍了在Pub Med检索系统使用中文摘要的主要技术方法。分析了此项工作对中文医学科技期刊在扩大期刊影响力、提高为读者服务质量等方面的积极意义。通过向Pub Med提交中文摘要,期刊的DOI解析量、Pub Med Link Out全文点击量、期刊全文下载量等均有稳步增长。中文医学科技期刊可以充分利用Pub Med国际权威检索系统提供的平台与技术优势,更好地向世界展示我国的学术发展水平。展开更多
The citation impact of scientific articles is highly uneven, even within the same journal, following a log-normal distribution where 20% of articles account for 80% citations （the ＂20/80 law＂）. It has also been su...The citation impact of scientific articles is highly uneven, even within the same journal, following a log-normal distribution where 20% of articles account for 80% citations （the ＂20/80 law＂）. It has also been suggested that half the literatures published is redundant as it is never cited.2 Therefore, many non-cited articles are published in scientific journals. In this article, the distribution of non-cited articles published in the Chinese Medical Journal （C34.1） in 2010 is reported aiming to provide evidence to guide the editorial work.展开更多
【目的】分析《中华医学杂志英文版》(Chinese Medical Journal,CMJ)与国外三大医学期刊《新英格兰医学杂志》《柳叶刀》《美国医学会杂志》通讯类文章的差异,为优化国内医学期刊通讯类栏目提供参考。【方法】利用Web of Science数据库...【目的】分析《中华医学杂志英文版》(Chinese Medical Journal,CMJ)与国外三大医学期刊《新英格兰医学杂志》《柳叶刀》《美国医学会杂志》通讯类文章的差异,为优化国内医学期刊通讯类栏目提供参考。【方法】利用Web of Science数据库和《期刊引证报告》,比较2015—2016年CMJ与国外三大医学期刊通讯类文章的载文情况,分析2017年排名前10位高被引文章的特点。【结果】CMJ通讯类文章刊载量、比例、被引频次和引用率均明显偏低;同时,对学科研究热点追踪程度低,从而导致被关注程度较低。【结论】国内医学期刊对通讯类文章重视程度不高,所发表的通讯类文章影响力较低。应重视通讯类栏目建设,及时把握相关学科领域的研究前沿和社会热点,刊发高影响力通讯类文章。展开更多
Objective： To determine the extent to which Chinese medical （CM） journals incorporate Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials （CONSORT） into their ＂instruction to authors＂. Methods： We reviewed the late...Objective： To determine the extent to which Chinese medical （CM） journals incorporate Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials （CONSORT） into their ＂instruction to authors＂. Methods： We reviewed the latest ＂instruction to authors＂ of the CM journals in China which indexed by MEDLINE in 2010 or Excerpta Medica Database （EMBASE） in 2012 and extracted all information of CONSORT, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors （ICMJE）, other reporting guidelines or clinical trial registration. By reading the instructions to authors and reviewing recent studies published in those journals, those that do not publish clinical trials were excluded. We also contacted each of journals by telephone on contributor＇s status to ask them whether mentioned CONSORT in their instructions and incorporated it into their editorial and peer-review process. Full-text papers of randomized controlled trials （RCTs, from January 2011 to March 2012） published in the journals which mentioned ＂CONSORT＂ in their instructions for authors were downloaded. Results： Seven CM journals were included. Three of these journals mentioned CONSORT in its instructions. By telephone survey, all journals gave responses and all respondents knew CONSORT statement. Three of 7 journals required authors to comply with the CONSORT statement and provide the CONSORT checklist and a flow chart of the trial. The rest 4 journals recommended authors of RCTs to refer to the CONSORT statement. From January 2011 to March 2012, a total of 50 RCTs were obtained from the 3 journals endorsing the CONSORT statement; 17 （17/50, 34%） contained a flow diagram in their manuscript, and none of those RCTs had mentioned the trial registration information. Conclusions： The endorsement of CONSORT by CM journals＇ ＂instruction to authors＂ was not satisfactory. The spread of CONSORT endorsement should be wider in instructing the performance of CM clinical trials in the future. Chinese journals should introduce CONSORT to their au展开更多
Along with fast development of economy, public health .demand and research budget, the medical research in China increased rapidly recent years, and the number of articles focusing on medicine from China, which were p...Along with fast development of economy, public health .demand and research budget, the medical research in China increased rapidly recent years, and the number of articles focusing on medicine from China, which were published by Journals indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded （SCI-E） or embodied in MEDLINE, increased obviously. Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ） is a leading platform in China for following the progress of medical research in various disciplines from China and any part of the world. As an international, peer-reviewed general medical journal from the Chinese Medical Association, impact factor （IF） of CMJ increased to 1.016 in 2013 （Thomson Reuters, USA）.展开更多
Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ）, founded in 1887 and the oldest medical journal in China, is one of our beloved journals.We began to read the journal from the days when we were medical students. We remembered Prof.Chu...Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ）, founded in 1887 and the oldest medical journal in China, is one of our beloved journals.We began to read the journal from the days when we were medical students. We remembered Prof.Chuan-Han Feng, the former Editor-in-Chief＇s words： ＂The journal is mainly devoted to international communication, reporting the recent progress and achievements in preventive and clinical medicine and biomedical sciences, with experience characteristic of China in particular,to be shared by the world medical family.＂[1] What Prof.Feng said 10 years ago is still the main mission of the journal today.展开更多
文摘【目的】对我国中文医学期刊在PubMed数据库中的收录及数据展示现状进行分析,为进一步提高期刊国际影响力提供参考。【方法】检索PubMed数据库中收录的中文医学期刊,对其基本信息、PubMed收录时间及在PubMed上的展示现状(数据更新时间、摘要语种、DOI和全文链接)进行分析,并探讨中文医学期刊与国际高影响力期刊(CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians)在数据展示方面的差异。【结果】PubMed收录的中文医学期刊以月刊居多,收录高峰期为1997年,2008年后逐渐减少;其中,35种PubMed收录期刊对文献数据进行了及时更新,25种采用中英双语摘要,32种标注了DOI,27种提供了全文链接。与中文医学期刊相比,CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians的文献均采用了提前在线出版方式。【结论】我国中文医学期刊被PubMed数据库收录的数量较少,而且已被收录的期刊在文献更新速度和内容方面尚需进一步改进。提前在线出版是我国中文医学期刊与国际高影响力期刊在数据展示方面的主要差距。
文摘【目的】通过《中华医学杂志(英文版)》(Chinese Medical Journal,CMJ;中华医学会会刊)对标《美国医学会杂志》(Journal of the American Medical Association,JAMA;美国医学会会刊)、《加拿大医学会杂志》(Canadian Medical Association Journal,CMAJ;加拿大医学会会刊)、《英国医学杂志》(British Medical Journal,BMJ;英国医学会会刊),探讨缩小CMJ与其他国家医学会会刊差距的对策与措施,为我国一流科技期刊的建设提供参考和借鉴。【方法】利用Web of Science数据库和期刊官网,检索并总结四国医学会会刊的各项指标数据,如影响因子、发文量、总被引频次、期刊引文指标(Journal Citation Indicator,JCI)、辐射范围、作者分布以及尖端论文等。【结果】CMJ的主要引证指标与JAMA、CMAJ、BMJ相比,除发文量外,其他数据差距明显。2016—2020年4种期刊的发文量分别为1590篇、1032篇、458篇和927篇。CMJ的发文量优势明显,分别为对标期刊的1.54倍、3.47倍和1.72倍。2020年4种期刊的总被引频次分别为34344次、687922次、64437次和600100次,即使总被引频次相对较少的CMAJ,其总被引频次也为CMJ的1.88倍。CMJ本国作者的发文比例为91.216%,明显高于JAMA、CMAJ和BMJ的本国作者发文比例(72.407%、76.539%和59.646%)。另外,CMJ的近5年的JCI均小于1,而JAMA、CMAJ和BMJ的JCI分别为11.49,1.84和6.27。【结论】我国科技期刊可通过期刊高质量建设战略,追踪研究热点与重大事件,引领学科发展,同时构建期刊学术生态圈,从而提升期刊的国际传播力与影响力。坚信在相关国家政策的支持下不断调整办刊思路,我国科技期刊一定会实现从跟跑,齐平到超越的伟大迈进。
文摘Scientific journals are more likely to publish those articles which will be highly cited after theirpublication. To improve the quality and the impact of the Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ）, the distribution of highly cited articles published in CMJ in 2010 was analyzed and reported in this article.
文摘为了提高中文医学科技期刊的国际影响力,更好地为广大读者提供日益完善的高质量服务,以《中国肺癌杂志》为例介绍了在Pub Med检索系统使用中文摘要的主要技术方法。分析了此项工作对中文医学科技期刊在扩大期刊影响力、提高为读者服务质量等方面的积极意义。通过向Pub Med提交中文摘要,期刊的DOI解析量、Pub Med Link Out全文点击量、期刊全文下载量等均有稳步增长。中文医学科技期刊可以充分利用Pub Med国际权威检索系统提供的平台与技术优势,更好地向世界展示我国的学术发展水平。
文摘The citation impact of scientific articles is highly uneven, even within the same journal, following a log-normal distribution where 20% of articles account for 80% citations （the ＂20/80 law＂）. It has also been suggested that half the literatures published is redundant as it is never cited.2 Therefore, many non-cited articles are published in scientific journals. In this article, the distribution of non-cited articles published in the Chinese Medical Journal （C34.1） in 2010 is reported aiming to provide evidence to guide the editorial work.
文摘【目的】分析《中华医学杂志英文版》(Chinese Medical Journal,CMJ)与国外三大医学期刊《新英格兰医学杂志》《柳叶刀》《美国医学会杂志》通讯类文章的差异,为优化国内医学期刊通讯类栏目提供参考。【方法】利用Web of Science数据库和《期刊引证报告》,比较2015—2016年CMJ与国外三大医学期刊通讯类文章的载文情况,分析2017年排名前10位高被引文章的特点。【结果】CMJ通讯类文章刊载量、比例、被引频次和引用率均明显偏低;同时,对学科研究热点追踪程度低,从而导致被关注程度较低。【结论】国内医学期刊对通讯类文章重视程度不高,所发表的通讯类文章影响力较低。应重视通讯类栏目建设,及时把握相关学科领域的研究前沿和社会热点,刊发高影响力通讯类文章。
文摘Objective： To determine the extent to which Chinese medical （CM） journals incorporate Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials （CONSORT） into their ＂instruction to authors＂. Methods： We reviewed the latest ＂instruction to authors＂ of the CM journals in China which indexed by MEDLINE in 2010 or Excerpta Medica Database （EMBASE） in 2012 and extracted all information of CONSORT, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors （ICMJE）, other reporting guidelines or clinical trial registration. By reading the instructions to authors and reviewing recent studies published in those journals, those that do not publish clinical trials were excluded. We also contacted each of journals by telephone on contributor＇s status to ask them whether mentioned CONSORT in their instructions and incorporated it into their editorial and peer-review process. Full-text papers of randomized controlled trials （RCTs, from January 2011 to March 2012） published in the journals which mentioned ＂CONSORT＂ in their instructions for authors were downloaded. Results： Seven CM journals were included. Three of these journals mentioned CONSORT in its instructions. By telephone survey, all journals gave responses and all respondents knew CONSORT statement. Three of 7 journals required authors to comply with the CONSORT statement and provide the CONSORT checklist and a flow chart of the trial. The rest 4 journals recommended authors of RCTs to refer to the CONSORT statement. From January 2011 to March 2012, a total of 50 RCTs were obtained from the 3 journals endorsing the CONSORT statement; 17 （17/50, 34%） contained a flow diagram in their manuscript, and none of those RCTs had mentioned the trial registration information. Conclusions： The endorsement of CONSORT by CM journals＇ ＂instruction to authors＂ was not satisfactory. The spread of CONSORT endorsement should be wider in instructing the performance of CM clinical trials in the future. Chinese journals should introduce CONSORT to their au
基金This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 81301410）.
文摘Along with fast development of economy, public health .demand and research budget, the medical research in China increased rapidly recent years, and the number of articles focusing on medicine from China, which were published by Journals indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded （SCI-E） or embodied in MEDLINE, increased obviously. Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ） is a leading platform in China for following the progress of medical research in various disciplines from China and any part of the world. As an international, peer-reviewed general medical journal from the Chinese Medical Association, impact factor （IF） of CMJ increased to 1.016 in 2013 （Thomson Reuters, USA）.
文摘Chinese Medical Journal （CMJ）, founded in 1887 and the oldest medical journal in China, is one of our beloved journals.We began to read the journal from the days when we were medical students. We remembered Prof.Chuan-Han Feng, the former Editor-in-Chief＇s words： ＂The journal is mainly devoted to international communication, reporting the recent progress and achievements in preventive and clinical medicine and biomedical sciences, with experience characteristic of China in particular,to be shared by the world medical family.＂[1] What Prof.Feng said 10 years ago is still the main mission of the journal today.
