目的探讨康艾注射液联合贝伐珠单抗注射液和DP方案(多西他赛注射液^+注射用顺铂)治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效。方法选取2010年1月-2013年1月昆山市第一人民医院收治的60例非小细胞肺癌患者为研究对象,将所有患者随机分为对照组(28例)和...目的探讨康艾注射液联合贝伐珠单抗注射液和DP方案(多西他赛注射液^+注射用顺铂)治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效。方法选取2010年1月-2013年1月昆山市第一人民医院收治的60例非小细胞肺癌患者为研究对象,将所有患者随机分为对照组(28例)和治疗组(32例)。对照组患者给予DP化疗方案,即第1天静脉滴注多西他赛注射液75 mg/m^2,维持1 h;静脉滴注注射用顺铂75 mg/m^2,平均分2天连续使用,维持2~6 h;然后静脉滴注贝伐珠单抗注射液15 mg/kg,1次/d。治疗组患者在对照组治疗的基础上静脉滴注康艾注射液,40 m L加入到5%葡萄糖溶液250 m L中,1次/d。3周为1个周期,两组患者治疗两个周期。观察两组的临床疗效,比较两组的生存质量、免疫功能指标、血小板指标、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平、生存时间。结果治疗后,对照组和治疗组的总有效率分别为46.43%、78.13%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者生理状况、社会家庭状况、情感情况、功能状况评分均显著升高,同组治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组生理状况、社会家庭状况、情感情况、功能状况评分均明显高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血清中CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+水平均显著升高,CD8^+水平显著降低,同组治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组患者免疫功能指标水平均明显优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血小板(PLT)水平显著升高,血小板分布宽度(PDW)、血小板大细胞比率(P-LCR)、VEGF水平均显著降低,同组治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组这些指标均明显优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,治疗组患者生存时间明显高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论康艾注射液联合贝伐珠�展开更多
AIM:To explore the efficacy of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab(IVB) injection combined with Ahmed glaucoma valve(AGV) implantation in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma(NVG).METHODS:This retrospective study i...AIM:To explore the efficacy of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab(IVB) injection combined with Ahmed glaucoma valve(AGV) implantation in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma(NVG).METHODS:This retrospective study included 35 eyes from 35 patients who underwent preoperative IVB and AGV implantation for treatment of NVG. Findings such as intraocular pressure(IOP) number of anti-glaucoma medications, visual acuity(VA), surgical success rates,and complications were recorded.RESULTS:AfterAGVimplantation,IOPwas18.2±4.0mmHg,15.5±3.3 mm Hg and 9.8±2.6 mm Hg at 6, 12 and 36 mo,significantly decreased compared with pre-IOP(P 【0.01).The number of anti-glaucoma medications was 0.9 ±0.5,0.8 ±0.9 and 0.8 ±0.6 at 6, 12 and 36 mo, significantly decreased compared to pre-treatment(P 【0.01). At last visit, there were 19 eyes with stable VA, 4 with VA improvement, 12 with diminished VA and 3 with complete loss light perception. There were 7 cases that failed during 3-year fellow up period. Cumulative probabilities of valve survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 82.9%,74.1% and 71.0% at 12, 24 and 36 mo, respectively. Cox stepwise regression analysis found that the survival time was significant associated with the pre-visual acuity 【2/400(P 【0.05). Post-operative complications occurred in 8eyes, of which hyphema presented in 2 eyes, choroidal effusion in 2 eyes.CONCLUSION:The procedure of preoperative IVB andAGV implantation should be one of treatments for NVG because of its safety and effectiveness.展开更多
AIM: To compare the efficacies of subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium injections for the inhibition of corneal neovascularization in an experimental rat model. METHODS: Sixteen corneas of 1...AIM: To compare the efficacies of subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium injections for the inhibition of corneal neovascularization in an experimental rat model. METHODS: Sixteen corneas of 16 rats were chemically cauterized and randomized into four groups: bevacizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/1.25mg bevacizumab, ranibizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/0.5mg ranibizumab, pegaptanib group that treated with 0.05mL/0.15mg pegaptanib sodium, and control group that treated with 0.05mL saline solution. Digital photographs of the corneas were taken and analyzed using an image analysis software program. All corneas were excised and examined histologically on the 15 th day. RESULTS: Each treatment group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than the control group (all P 【0.05). In addition, bevacizumab group had significantly less neovascu-larized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups (both P 【0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups regarding percentage of neovascularized corneal areas and number of blood vessels (both P 】0.05). CONCLUSION: Subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibiz-umab, and pegaptanib sodium were effective with no corneal epitheliopathy for inhibiting corneal neovascularization after corneal burn in rats .Bevacizumab was more effective than ranibizumab and pegaptanib sodium.展开更多
Background Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor （anti-VEGF） drugs and corticosteroids are being widely used to treat diabetic macular edema （DME）. The purpose of this study was to evaluate further ...Background Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor （anti-VEGF） drugs and corticosteroids are being widely used to treat diabetic macular edema （DME）. The purpose of this study was to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab （IVB） alone in comparison with intravitreal bevacizumab combined with triamcinolone acetonide （IVB/IVT） in the treatment of DME. Methods Pertinent publications were identified through CNKI, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to November 30, 2013. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the trials, and changes in central macular thickness （CMT） and best-corrected visual acuity （BCVA） were extracted at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the initial treatment. A meta-analysis was carried out to compare the results between the groups receiving IVB and IVB/IVT using the software RevMan 5.0. Results A total of six randomized controlled trials （RCTs） were identified and included. The meta-analysis revealed that a significant reduction of the CMT was observed at 3 months after the initial treatment in the IVB/IVT group compared to the IVB group （P=-0.001）. Also, changes in CMT at 6 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months did not vary significantly between the IVB and IVB/IVT groups （P=0.53, 0.76, 0.34, and 0.09, respectively）. Similarly, changes in BCVA at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months also did not vary significantly between the two groups （P=-0.66, 0.98, 0.81, 0.07, and 0.80, respectively）. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. However, the rate of intraocular pressure （IOP） rise after intravitreal injections varied significantly between the IVB and IVB/IV＇r groups （P 〈0.01）. A publication bias was not detected by funnel plots, the Egger method, or the Begg method. Conclusions Results of this meta-analysis showed that the treatments with IVB alone and combined IVB/IVT were similarly effective in improving the visual acuity, and, to some degre展开更多
文摘目的探讨康艾注射液联合贝伐珠单抗注射液和DP方案(多西他赛注射液^+注射用顺铂)治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效。方法选取2010年1月-2013年1月昆山市第一人民医院收治的60例非小细胞肺癌患者为研究对象,将所有患者随机分为对照组(28例)和治疗组(32例)。对照组患者给予DP化疗方案,即第1天静脉滴注多西他赛注射液75 mg/m^2,维持1 h;静脉滴注注射用顺铂75 mg/m^2,平均分2天连续使用,维持2~6 h;然后静脉滴注贝伐珠单抗注射液15 mg/kg,1次/d。治疗组患者在对照组治疗的基础上静脉滴注康艾注射液,40 m L加入到5%葡萄糖溶液250 m L中,1次/d。3周为1个周期,两组患者治疗两个周期。观察两组的临床疗效,比较两组的生存质量、免疫功能指标、血小板指标、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平、生存时间。结果治疗后,对照组和治疗组的总有效率分别为46.43%、78.13%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者生理状况、社会家庭状况、情感情况、功能状况评分均显著升高,同组治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组生理状况、社会家庭状况、情感情况、功能状况评分均明显高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血清中CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+水平均显著升高,CD8^+水平显著降低,同组治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组患者免疫功能指标水平均明显优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血小板(PLT)水平显著升高,血小板分布宽度(PDW)、血小板大细胞比率(P-LCR)、VEGF水平均显著降低,同组治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且治疗组这些指标均明显优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,治疗组患者生存时间明显高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论康艾注射液联合贝伐珠�
文摘AIM:To explore the efficacy of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab(IVB) injection combined with Ahmed glaucoma valve(AGV) implantation in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma(NVG).METHODS:This retrospective study included 35 eyes from 35 patients who underwent preoperative IVB and AGV implantation for treatment of NVG. Findings such as intraocular pressure(IOP) number of anti-glaucoma medications, visual acuity(VA), surgical success rates,and complications were recorded.RESULTS:AfterAGVimplantation,IOPwas18.2±4.0mmHg,15.5±3.3 mm Hg and 9.8±2.6 mm Hg at 6, 12 and 36 mo,significantly decreased compared with pre-IOP(P 【0.01).The number of anti-glaucoma medications was 0.9 ±0.5,0.8 ±0.9 and 0.8 ±0.6 at 6, 12 and 36 mo, significantly decreased compared to pre-treatment(P 【0.01). At last visit, there were 19 eyes with stable VA, 4 with VA improvement, 12 with diminished VA and 3 with complete loss light perception. There were 7 cases that failed during 3-year fellow up period. Cumulative probabilities of valve survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 82.9%,74.1% and 71.0% at 12, 24 and 36 mo, respectively. Cox stepwise regression analysis found that the survival time was significant associated with the pre-visual acuity 【2/400(P 【0.05). Post-operative complications occurred in 8eyes, of which hyphema presented in 2 eyes, choroidal effusion in 2 eyes.CONCLUSION:The procedure of preoperative IVB andAGV implantation should be one of treatments for NVG because of its safety and effectiveness.
文摘AIM: To compare the efficacies of subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium injections for the inhibition of corneal neovascularization in an experimental rat model. METHODS: Sixteen corneas of 16 rats were chemically cauterized and randomized into four groups: bevacizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/1.25mg bevacizumab, ranibizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/0.5mg ranibizumab, pegaptanib group that treated with 0.05mL/0.15mg pegaptanib sodium, and control group that treated with 0.05mL saline solution. Digital photographs of the corneas were taken and analyzed using an image analysis software program. All corneas were excised and examined histologically on the 15 th day. RESULTS: Each treatment group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than the control group (all P 【0.05). In addition, bevacizumab group had significantly less neovascu-larized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups (both P 【0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups regarding percentage of neovascularized corneal areas and number of blood vessels (both P 】0.05). CONCLUSION: Subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibiz-umab, and pegaptanib sodium were effective with no corneal epitheliopathy for inhibiting corneal neovascularization after corneal burn in rats .Bevacizumab was more effective than ranibizumab and pegaptanib sodium.
文摘Background Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor （anti-VEGF） drugs and corticosteroids are being widely used to treat diabetic macular edema （DME）. The purpose of this study was to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab （IVB） alone in comparison with intravitreal bevacizumab combined with triamcinolone acetonide （IVB/IVT） in the treatment of DME. Methods Pertinent publications were identified through CNKI, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to November 30, 2013. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the trials, and changes in central macular thickness （CMT） and best-corrected visual acuity （BCVA） were extracted at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the initial treatment. A meta-analysis was carried out to compare the results between the groups receiving IVB and IVB/IVT using the software RevMan 5.0. Results A total of six randomized controlled trials （RCTs） were identified and included. The meta-analysis revealed that a significant reduction of the CMT was observed at 3 months after the initial treatment in the IVB/IVT group compared to the IVB group （P=-0.001）. Also, changes in CMT at 6 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months did not vary significantly between the IVB and IVB/IVT groups （P=0.53, 0.76, 0.34, and 0.09, respectively）. Similarly, changes in BCVA at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months also did not vary significantly between the two groups （P=-0.66, 0.98, 0.81, 0.07, and 0.80, respectively）. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. However, the rate of intraocular pressure （IOP） rise after intravitreal injections varied significantly between the IVB and IVB/IV＇r groups （P 〈0.01）. A publication bias was not detected by funnel plots, the Egger method, or the Begg method. Conclusions Results of this meta-analysis showed that the treatments with IVB alone and combined IVB/IVT were similarly effective in improving the visual acuity, and, to some degre
