Lithium separation technique for three reference materials has been established together with precise determination of lithium isotope using a Neptune multi collector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry （MC-...Lithium separation technique for three reference materials has been established together with precise determination of lithium isotope using a Neptune multi collector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry （MC-ICP-MS）. The solutions of lithium element standard reference materials, potassium, calcium, sodium, magnesium and iron single element, were used to evaluate analytical methods applied. Three separate stages of ion-exchange chromatography were carried out using organic cation-exchange resin （AG 50W-X8）. Lithium was enriched for the three stages using different eluants, which are 2.8 M HCl, 0.15 M HCl and 0.5 M HCl in 30% ethanol, respectively. The columns for the first and second stages are made of polypropylene, and those for the third stage are made of quartz. Total reagent volume for the entire chemical process was 35 mL for three reference materials. The recovery yielded for the three stages is 98.9-101.2% with an average of 100.0%, 97.6-101.9% with an average of 99.9%, and 99.8-103.3% with an average of 100.6%, respectively. The precision of this technique is conservatively estimated to be ±0.72-1.04‰ （2σ population）, which is similar to the precision obtained by different authors in different laboratories with MC-ICP-MS. The δ7 Li values （ 7 Li/ 6 Li relative to the IRMM-016 standard） determined for andesite （AGV-2） and basalt （BHVO-2） are 5.68‰ （n=18）, 4.33‰ （n=18）, respectively. The δ7 Li value （ 7Li/6Li relative to the L-SVEC standard） determined for IRMM-016 is -0.01‰ （n=15）. All these analytical results are in good agreement with those previously reported. In addition, the results for the same kinds of samples analyzed at the MLR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, are consistent with those obtained at the Plasma Laboratory, University of Maryland, within analytical uncertainty. According to these experiment results, it is concluded that this proposed 展开更多
基金supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 40973013,41173003)the Ministry of Land and Resources (no.201011027)+2 种基金China Geological Survey (no.1212011120298, 1212010816027)the Ministry of Science and Technology (no. K0802)the Open Foundation of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (no. 2009-SYS-06)
文摘Lithium separation technique for three reference materials has been established together with precise determination of lithium isotope using a Neptune multi collector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry （MC-ICP-MS）. The solutions of lithium element standard reference materials, potassium, calcium, sodium, magnesium and iron single element, were used to evaluate analytical methods applied. Three separate stages of ion-exchange chromatography were carried out using organic cation-exchange resin （AG 50W-X8）. Lithium was enriched for the three stages using different eluants, which are 2.8 M HCl, 0.15 M HCl and 0.5 M HCl in 30% ethanol, respectively. The columns for the first and second stages are made of polypropylene, and those for the third stage are made of quartz. Total reagent volume for the entire chemical process was 35 mL for three reference materials. The recovery yielded for the three stages is 98.9-101.2% with an average of 100.0%, 97.6-101.9% with an average of 99.9%, and 99.8-103.3% with an average of 100.6%, respectively. The precision of this technique is conservatively estimated to be ±0.72-1.04‰ （2σ population）, which is similar to the precision obtained by different authors in different laboratories with MC-ICP-MS. The δ7 Li values （ 7 Li/ 6 Li relative to the IRMM-016 standard） determined for andesite （AGV-2） and basalt （BHVO-2） are 5.68‰ （n=18）, 4.33‰ （n=18）, respectively. The δ7 Li value （ 7Li/6Li relative to the L-SVEC standard） determined for IRMM-016 is -0.01‰ （n=15）. All these analytical results are in good agreement with those previously reported. In addition, the results for the same kinds of samples analyzed at the MLR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, are consistent with those obtained at the Plasma Laboratory, University of Maryland, within analytical uncertainty. According to these experiment results, it is concluded that this proposed
