Background and Objective:Percutaneous ultrasound-guided thermal ablation is one of the major treatment methods for liver cancer.Tumor location close to the diaphragm or gastrointestinal tract was regarded as the treat...Background and Objective:Percutaneous ultrasound-guided thermal ablation is one of the major treatment methods for liver cancer.Tumor location close to the diaphragm or gastrointestinal tract was regarded as the treatment contraindication before due to poor visibility of the tumor or increased risk of thermal injury to the adjacent organs.This study used artificial pleural effusion or ascites to extend the indications of thermal ablation for liver cancer.Methods:Artificial pleural effusion (20 cases) or ascites (36 cases) was performed in 56 difficult cases of percutaneous thermal ablation for liver tumors.The technical success rates, the rate of approaching the procedure goal, complications, and local treatment response were assessed.Results:The technical success rates were 95%(19/20) for artificial pleural effusion and 100% (36/36) for artificial ascites, the achieve purpose rates were 100%(19/19) and 91.7% (33/36), the complete ablation rates were 84.2% (16/19) and 93.9% (31/33), respectively.Coughing, transient hematuria, and subcutaneous effusion were observed in 3 patients after the procedure of artificial pleural effusion, and hydrothorax in the right chest occurred in 1 patient during the artificial ascites process.Conclusions:Thermal ablation with the use of artificial pleural effusion or ascites is a safe and effective treatment for liver tumors, and the technique can widen the indications of thermal ablation for liver tumors.展开更多
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of artificial ascites induction for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of peridiaphragmatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through retrospective cohort analysis comparing characteristics an...Purpose: To evaluate the utility of artificial ascites induction for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of peridiaphragmatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through retrospective cohort analysis comparing characteristics and complications of peridiaphragmatic HCC without the use of artificial ascites to non-peridiaphragmatic HCC. Materials and Methods: IRB approval was obtained. From September 2003 to December 2008, 150 consecutive patients with hepatic tumors received percutaneous RFA. 110 patients had presumed HCC, and of those 21 had lesions abutting the diaphragm. Of the remaining 89 patients with non-peridiaphragmatic HCC lesions, 21 were randomly selected for the comparison group. RFA volume, major and minor complication rates, pain, technical success, and recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no statistical difference in RFA volume (P = 0.962), overall major complication rate (P = 0.343) and minor complication rate (P = 0.118) between the two groups. However, the peridiaphragmatic group that underwent RFA with a clustered-needle demonstrated a statistically significant higher proportion of major complications compared to the non-peridiaphragmatic clustered-needle group (P = 0.033). There was no statistical difference in pain severity (P = 0.8802) or pain location (P = 0.15). There was no statistical difference in technical success rates (P = 1), local tumor progression rates (P = 1), or time to local tumor recurrence (P = 0.67). Conclusion: Artificial ascites induction for RFA of HCC lesions adjacent to the diaphragm may not be necessary, although clustered electrode technique should be avoided in this location as they present with a higher complication rate.展开更多
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30970837)New Century Excellent Talent Supporting Program of the Chinese Ministry of Education (No.NCET-06-0723)
文摘Background and Objective:Percutaneous ultrasound-guided thermal ablation is one of the major treatment methods for liver cancer.Tumor location close to the diaphragm or gastrointestinal tract was regarded as the treatment contraindication before due to poor visibility of the tumor or increased risk of thermal injury to the adjacent organs.This study used artificial pleural effusion or ascites to extend the indications of thermal ablation for liver cancer.Methods:Artificial pleural effusion (20 cases) or ascites (36 cases) was performed in 56 difficult cases of percutaneous thermal ablation for liver tumors.The technical success rates, the rate of approaching the procedure goal, complications, and local treatment response were assessed.Results:The technical success rates were 95%(19/20) for artificial pleural effusion and 100% (36/36) for artificial ascites, the achieve purpose rates were 100%(19/19) and 91.7% (33/36), the complete ablation rates were 84.2% (16/19) and 93.9% (31/33), respectively.Coughing, transient hematuria, and subcutaneous effusion were observed in 3 patients after the procedure of artificial pleural effusion, and hydrothorax in the right chest occurred in 1 patient during the artificial ascites process.Conclusions:Thermal ablation with the use of artificial pleural effusion or ascites is a safe and effective treatment for liver tumors, and the technique can widen the indications of thermal ablation for liver tumors.
文摘Purpose: To evaluate the utility of artificial ascites induction for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of peridiaphragmatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through retrospective cohort analysis comparing characteristics and complications of peridiaphragmatic HCC without the use of artificial ascites to non-peridiaphragmatic HCC. Materials and Methods: IRB approval was obtained. From September 2003 to December 2008, 150 consecutive patients with hepatic tumors received percutaneous RFA. 110 patients had presumed HCC, and of those 21 had lesions abutting the diaphragm. Of the remaining 89 patients with non-peridiaphragmatic HCC lesions, 21 were randomly selected for the comparison group. RFA volume, major and minor complication rates, pain, technical success, and recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no statistical difference in RFA volume (P = 0.962), overall major complication rate (P = 0.343) and minor complication rate (P = 0.118) between the two groups. However, the peridiaphragmatic group that underwent RFA with a clustered-needle demonstrated a statistically significant higher proportion of major complications compared to the non-peridiaphragmatic clustered-needle group (P = 0.033). There was no statistical difference in pain severity (P = 0.8802) or pain location (P = 0.15). There was no statistical difference in technical success rates (P = 1), local tumor progression rates (P = 1), or time to local tumor recurrence (P = 0.67). Conclusion: Artificial ascites induction for RFA of HCC lesions adjacent to the diaphragm may not be necessary, although clustered electrode technique should be avoided in this location as they present with a higher complication rate.
