目的:验证流调中心抑郁量表(The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)在我国城市人群中不同年龄组的适用性,并建立各年龄组常模。方法:采用横断面研究方法,在全国21省39座城市收集普通人群样本16047名[年龄11～...目的:验证流调中心抑郁量表(The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)在我国城市人群中不同年龄组的适用性,并建立各年龄组常模。方法:采用横断面研究方法,在全国21省39座城市收集普通人群样本16047名[年龄11～100岁,平均(37.7±21.3)岁]以建立常模,在4个城市的精神科门诊与住院病人中选取病人样本349名[年龄16～81岁,平均(32.0±12.1)岁]以检验效标效度。从普通人群样本中抽取北京、东莞、包头的199名企业职工、100名大学生、30名教师进行了间隔8周的重测,以检验重测信度。结果:CES-D的Cronbachα系数为0.90,各因素的Cronbachα系数为0.68～0.86;间隔8周的重测信度为0.49(P<0.01),各因素重测相关为0.39～0.51(P<0.01);验证性因素分析支持原量表4因素的结构(RMSEA=0.057,CFI=0.976,GFI=0.948);心理疾病患者CES-D得分高于普通人群[(21.72±13.39)vs.(13.24±10.33),P<0.01)],其中抑郁患者得分最高[(27.82±14.42),P<0.01];不同年龄组CES-D得分差异有统计学意义,60岁以上组得分高于60岁以下各组(P<0.01)。结论:中文版流调中心抑郁量表适用于我国不同年龄群体,是一个可靠而有效的自评式抑郁症状测量工具。展开更多
目的:验证流调中心抑郁量表(The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)在我国青少年中的适用性。方法:收集10,210名13-18岁青少年被试做答的结果。结果:CES-D的Cronbach α系数为0.88;验证性因素分析支持原量表...目的:验证流调中心抑郁量表(The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)在我国青少年中的适用性。方法:收集10,210名13-18岁青少年被试做答的结果。结果:CES-D的Cronbach α系数为0.88;验证性因素分析支持原量表4因子的结构;性别差异显著,女生得分高于男生;年级差异显著,得分呈现随年级升高而升高的趋势;学业成绩、家庭状况等不同的被试在CES-D得分上也有显著差异。结论:CES-D在中学生群体中使用时显示出良好的信度和效度,基本适用于我国青少年。展开更多
Objective:To explore the relationship between emotional intelligence and anxiety,depression and mood in a sample of college students.Methods:438 college students in three universities in Guangzhou city completed a que...Objective:To explore the relationship between emotional intelligence and anxiety,depression and mood in a sample of college students.Methods:438 college students in three universities in Guangzhou city completed a questionnaire which consisted of Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS)and Self-report Anxity Scale(SAS),Self-report Depression Scale(SDS)and Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale(PANAS).Results:(1)The average scores of college students in EIS was 125.84±13.75.(2)The scores of college students in EIS were negatively correlated with their anxiety levels and depression levels.(3)The scores of college students in EIS were positively correlated with Positive Affect (PA),but negatively correlated with Negative Affect(NA) in PANAS.Conclusion:Emotional intelligence plays important roles in college students’ emotional well-being.展开更多
文摘目的:验证流调中心抑郁量表(The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)在我国城市人群中不同年龄组的适用性,并建立各年龄组常模。方法:采用横断面研究方法,在全国21省39座城市收集普通人群样本16047名[年龄11～100岁,平均(37.7±21.3)岁]以建立常模,在4个城市的精神科门诊与住院病人中选取病人样本349名[年龄16～81岁,平均(32.0±12.1)岁]以检验效标效度。从普通人群样本中抽取北京、东莞、包头的199名企业职工、100名大学生、30名教师进行了间隔8周的重测,以检验重测信度。结果:CES-D的Cronbachα系数为0.90,各因素的Cronbachα系数为0.68～0.86;间隔8周的重测信度为0.49(P<0.01),各因素重测相关为0.39～0.51(P<0.01);验证性因素分析支持原量表4因素的结构(RMSEA=0.057,CFI=0.976,GFI=0.948);心理疾病患者CES-D得分高于普通人群[(21.72±13.39)vs.(13.24±10.33),P<0.01)],其中抑郁患者得分最高[(27.82±14.42),P<0.01];不同年龄组CES-D得分差异有统计学意义,60岁以上组得分高于60岁以下各组(P<0.01)。结论:中文版流调中心抑郁量表适用于我国不同年龄群体,是一个可靠而有效的自评式抑郁症状测量工具。
文摘目的:验证流调中心抑郁量表(The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)在我国青少年中的适用性。方法:收集10,210名13-18岁青少年被试做答的结果。结果:CES-D的Cronbach α系数为0.88;验证性因素分析支持原量表4因子的结构;性别差异显著,女生得分高于男生;年级差异显著,得分呈现随年级升高而升高的趋势;学业成绩、家庭状况等不同的被试在CES-D得分上也有显著差异。结论:CES-D在中学生群体中使用时显示出良好的信度和效度,基本适用于我国青少年。
文摘Objective:To explore the relationship between emotional intelligence and anxiety,depression and mood in a sample of college students.Methods:438 college students in three universities in Guangzhou city completed a questionnaire which consisted of Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS)and Self-report Anxity Scale(SAS),Self-report Depression Scale(SDS)and Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale(PANAS).Results:(1)The average scores of college students in EIS was 125.84±13.75.(2)The scores of college students in EIS were negatively correlated with their anxiety levels and depression levels.(3)The scores of college students in EIS were positively correlated with Positive Affect (PA),but negatively correlated with Negative Affect(NA) in PANAS.Conclusion:Emotional intelligence plays important roles in college students’ emotional well-being.
