目的 :对比分析100 k V条件下前瞻性与回顾性心电门控冠状动脉CTA图像质量与辐射剂量的差异,为低剂量个性化冠脉CTA扫描方案的制订提供参考依据。方法:将临床疑诊冠心病而行冠状动脉CTA检查的104例患者随机分为2组,分别行100 k V前瞻性(...目的 :对比分析100 k V条件下前瞻性与回顾性心电门控冠状动脉CTA图像质量与辐射剂量的差异,为低剂量个性化冠脉CTA扫描方案的制订提供参考依据。方法:将临床疑诊冠心病而行冠状动脉CTA检查的104例患者随机分为2组,分别行100 k V前瞻性(A组)与回顾性心电门控(B组)扫描;所有患者心律平稳,心率≤65次/min,体质量指数<25 kg/m2。记录2组的辐射剂量,计算噪声、SNR及对比噪声比(CNR),并对图像进行主观评分。结果:A组和B组有效辐射剂量分别为(1.63±0.26)m Sv和(4.90±0.93)m Sv。A组的辐射剂量较B组降低66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组与B组的噪声差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组的SNR及CNR低于B组(P<0.05)。2组冠脉图像质量的主观评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与回顾性心电门控相比,100 k V前瞻性冠状动脉CTA在有效降低辐射剂量的同时,可以获得满意的图像质量。展开更多
The role of 16-slice spiral CT was selective X-ray coronary angiography （SCA） who were suspected of having coronary heart evaluated in the diagnosis of coronary stenosis, with serving as the reference standard. Sixt...The role of 16-slice spiral CT was selective X-ray coronary angiography （SCA） who were suspected of having coronary heart evaluated in the diagnosis of coronary stenosis, with serving as the reference standard. Sixty-five patients disease, without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass-grafting, were investigated using 16-slice CT. Eight patients with pre-scan heart rate of more than 80 beats/min were given β-blockers. After the retrospectively ECG-gated axial imaging reconstruction, volume redering （VR）, multi-planar reconstruction （MPR）, curved MPR and maximum intensity projection （MIP） were used to reconstruct. Every segment of coronary artery with a diameter ≥1.5 mm was assessed, and the presence on CT with a stenosis exceeding 50 % diameter reduction was compared with that on SCA. The reasons which lead to some segments unevaluable were analysed. Compared with SCA, 93 % coronary segments and 94 % main branches were evaluable. Residual cardiac motion artifacts, severe calcification and poor opacification made 58 %, 28 % and 14 % of the remaining 60 segments unevaluable respectively. Without routine administration of β-blockers, good coronary imaging quality can be acquired using 16-slice spiral CT. It is a reliable noninvasive method for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.展开更多
文摘目的 :对比分析100 k V条件下前瞻性与回顾性心电门控冠状动脉CTA图像质量与辐射剂量的差异,为低剂量个性化冠脉CTA扫描方案的制订提供参考依据。方法:将临床疑诊冠心病而行冠状动脉CTA检查的104例患者随机分为2组,分别行100 k V前瞻性(A组)与回顾性心电门控(B组)扫描;所有患者心律平稳,心率≤65次/min,体质量指数<25 kg/m2。记录2组的辐射剂量,计算噪声、SNR及对比噪声比(CNR),并对图像进行主观评分。结果:A组和B组有效辐射剂量分别为(1.63±0.26)m Sv和(4.90±0.93)m Sv。A组的辐射剂量较B组降低66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组与B组的噪声差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组的SNR及CNR低于B组(P<0.05)。2组冠脉图像质量的主观评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与回顾性心电门控相比,100 k V前瞻性冠状动脉CTA在有效降低辐射剂量的同时,可以获得满意的图像质量。
文摘The role of 16-slice spiral CT was selective X-ray coronary angiography （SCA） who were suspected of having coronary heart evaluated in the diagnosis of coronary stenosis, with serving as the reference standard. Sixty-five patients disease, without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass-grafting, were investigated using 16-slice CT. Eight patients with pre-scan heart rate of more than 80 beats/min were given β-blockers. After the retrospectively ECG-gated axial imaging reconstruction, volume redering （VR）, multi-planar reconstruction （MPR）, curved MPR and maximum intensity projection （MIP） were used to reconstruct. Every segment of coronary artery with a diameter ≥1.5 mm was assessed, and the presence on CT with a stenosis exceeding 50 % diameter reduction was compared with that on SCA. The reasons which lead to some segments unevaluable were analysed. Compared with SCA, 93 % coronary segments and 94 % main branches were evaluable. Residual cardiac motion artifacts, severe calcification and poor opacification made 58 %, 28 % and 14 % of the remaining 60 segments unevaluable respectively. Without routine administration of β-blockers, good coronary imaging quality can be acquired using 16-slice spiral CT. It is a reliable noninvasive method for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.
