Purpose: To investigate the toxicity, survival and patterns of failure in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: Retrospec...Purpose: To investigate the toxicity, survival and patterns of failure in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: Retrospective chart review of 68 total patients: 46 academic and 22 community center. Endpoints: Grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis, Grade ≥ 2 esophagitis, local, regional and distant failure, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: For the academic center patients, median follow-up was 19.2 months. Esophagitis: 0% Grade 3, 35% Grade 2, no significant difference between dose bins: <70 Gy vs. 70 Gy, 25% vs. 45% (p = 0.22), <66 Gy vs. 66 - 70 Gy, 28% vs. 39% (p = 0.53). Lung dose metrics and PTV size were not associated with Grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis. Esophageal V35, V50, and mean dose but not PTV size was associated with Grade 2 esophagitis. 1 year local, regional and distant failure = 6.5%, 6.5%, and 30.4%. No endpoint differences were seen between dose bins, though patients with smaller PTVs treated with 70 Gy did demonstrate improved OS (ns) when compared to those treated with <70 Gy. Community Center: Median follow-up 6.2 months with 15% Grade 2 esophagitis, no Grade 3 esophagitis. Two patients (9%) experienced Grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis. Conclusions: IMRT chemoradiation was well tolerated in a population with advanced NSCLC both in the academic and community settings. Severe pneumonitis rates were low and comparable to other series using IMRT and chemotherapy. Esophagitis was mild and associated with V35, V50 and mean dose. No significant benefit was seen for higher doses regarding survival, local, regional or distant control despite that higher dose bins had smaller tumors. Though not statistically significant, we did find a trend toward worse OS for <70 Gy when the PTV was less than the median PTV.展开更多
Objective:Penile cancer is a rare malignancy in most developed countries,but may represent a significant oncologic challenge in certain African,Asian,and South American regions.Various treatment approaches have been d...Objective:Penile cancer is a rare malignancy in most developed countries,but may represent a significant oncologic challenge in certain African,Asian,and South American regions.Various treatment approaches have been described in penile cancer,including radio-therapy.This review aimed to provide a synopsis of radiotherapy use in penile cancer management and the associated toxicities.In addition,we aimed to discuss palliative radiation for metastases to the penis and provide a brief overview of how tumor biology may assist with treatment decision-making.Methods:Peer-reviewed manuscripts related to the treatment of penile cancer with radio-therapy were evaluated by a PubMed search(1960-2021)in order to assess its role in the definitive and adjuvant settings.Selected manuscripts were also evaluated for descriptions of radiation-related toxicity.Results:Though surgical resection of the primary is an excellent option for tumor control,select patients may be treated with organ-sparing radiotherapy by either external beam radiation or brachytherapy.Data from randomized controlled trials comparing radiotherapy and surgery are lacking,and thus management is frequently determined by institutional practice patterns and available expertise.Similarly,this lack of clinical trial data leads to divergence in opinion regarding lymph node management.This is further complicated in that many cited studies evaluating lymph node radiotherapy used non-modern radiotherapy delivery techniques.Groin toxicity from either surgery or radiotherapy remains a challenging problem and further risk assessment is needed to guide intensification with multi-modal therapy.Intrinsic differences in tumor biology,based on human papillomavirus infection,may help aid future prognostic and predictive models in patient risk stratification or treatment approach.Conclusion:Penile cancer is a rare disease with limited clinical trial data driving the majority of treatment decisions.As a result,the goal of management is to effectively treat the disease while balan展开更多
文摘Purpose: To investigate the toxicity, survival and patterns of failure in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: Retrospective chart review of 68 total patients: 46 academic and 22 community center. Endpoints: Grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis, Grade ≥ 2 esophagitis, local, regional and distant failure, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: For the academic center patients, median follow-up was 19.2 months. Esophagitis: 0% Grade 3, 35% Grade 2, no significant difference between dose bins: <70 Gy vs. 70 Gy, 25% vs. 45% (p = 0.22), <66 Gy vs. 66 - 70 Gy, 28% vs. 39% (p = 0.53). Lung dose metrics and PTV size were not associated with Grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis. Esophageal V35, V50, and mean dose but not PTV size was associated with Grade 2 esophagitis. 1 year local, regional and distant failure = 6.5%, 6.5%, and 30.4%. No endpoint differences were seen between dose bins, though patients with smaller PTVs treated with 70 Gy did demonstrate improved OS (ns) when compared to those treated with <70 Gy. Community Center: Median follow-up 6.2 months with 15% Grade 2 esophagitis, no Grade 3 esophagitis. Two patients (9%) experienced Grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis. Conclusions: IMRT chemoradiation was well tolerated in a population with advanced NSCLC both in the academic and community settings. Severe pneumonitis rates were low and comparable to other series using IMRT and chemotherapy. Esophagitis was mild and associated with V35, V50 and mean dose. No significant benefit was seen for higher doses regarding survival, local, regional or distant control despite that higher dose bins had smaller tumors. Though not statistically significant, we did find a trend toward worse OS for <70 Gy when the PTV was less than the median PTV.
文摘Objective:Penile cancer is a rare malignancy in most developed countries,but may represent a significant oncologic challenge in certain African,Asian,and South American regions.Various treatment approaches have been described in penile cancer,including radio-therapy.This review aimed to provide a synopsis of radiotherapy use in penile cancer management and the associated toxicities.In addition,we aimed to discuss palliative radiation for metastases to the penis and provide a brief overview of how tumor biology may assist with treatment decision-making.Methods:Peer-reviewed manuscripts related to the treatment of penile cancer with radio-therapy were evaluated by a PubMed search(1960-2021)in order to assess its role in the definitive and adjuvant settings.Selected manuscripts were also evaluated for descriptions of radiation-related toxicity.Results:Though surgical resection of the primary is an excellent option for tumor control,select patients may be treated with organ-sparing radiotherapy by either external beam radiation or brachytherapy.Data from randomized controlled trials comparing radiotherapy and surgery are lacking,and thus management is frequently determined by institutional practice patterns and available expertise.Similarly,this lack of clinical trial data leads to divergence in opinion regarding lymph node management.This is further complicated in that many cited studies evaluating lymph node radiotherapy used non-modern radiotherapy delivery techniques.Groin toxicity from either surgery or radiotherapy remains a challenging problem and further risk assessment is needed to guide intensification with multi-modal therapy.Intrinsic differences in tumor biology,based on human papillomavirus infection,may help aid future prognostic and predictive models in patient risk stratification or treatment approach.Conclusion:Penile cancer is a rare disease with limited clinical trial data driving the majority of treatment decisions.As a result,the goal of management is to effectively treat the disease while balan
