目的了解永久性结肠造口患者伤残接受度、社会支持及应对方式的现状,并分析伤残接受度与社会支持及应对方式的相关性。方法采用伤残接受度量表(Acceptance of Disabiliy Scale,AODS)、社会支持评定量表(Social Support Rating Scale,SS...目的了解永久性结肠造口患者伤残接受度、社会支持及应对方式的现状,并分析伤残接受度与社会支持及应对方式的相关性。方法采用伤残接受度量表(Acceptance of Disabiliy Scale,AODS)、社会支持评定量表(Social Support Rating Scale,SSRS)、简易应对方式问卷(Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire,SCSQ)、自制的一般资料调查表,对108例永久性结肠造口患者进行调查。结果永久性结肠造口患者伤残接受度总分为(80.22±9.66)分,总体处于中等水平;永久性结肠造口患者伤残接受度总分与社会支持得分、积极应对得分呈正相关,与消极应对得分呈负相关(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论永久性结肠造口患者的伤残接受度有待提升,医护人员应针对现有的社会支持系统,探索有效的干预措施,帮助患者采取积极应对的方式,提高其生活质量。展开更多
Dynamics of soil nematode communities amended with agrochemicals and bio control preparations were investigated in a soybean field. The results showed that the frequency of plant non parasitic nematodes were obviously...Dynamics of soil nematode communities amended with agrochemicals and bio control preparations were investigated in a soybean field. The results showed that the frequency of plant non parasitic nematodes were obviously higher in soil amended with bio control preparations (Doufeng 1) than with urea and herbicide, however, that of plant parasitic nematodes exhibited an inverse trend.展开更多
文摘目的了解永久性结肠造口患者伤残接受度、社会支持及应对方式的现状,并分析伤残接受度与社会支持及应对方式的相关性。方法采用伤残接受度量表(Acceptance of Disabiliy Scale,AODS)、社会支持评定量表(Social Support Rating Scale,SSRS)、简易应对方式问卷(Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire,SCSQ)、自制的一般资料调查表,对108例永久性结肠造口患者进行调查。结果永久性结肠造口患者伤残接受度总分为(80.22±9.66)分,总体处于中等水平;永久性结肠造口患者伤残接受度总分与社会支持得分、积极应对得分呈正相关,与消极应对得分呈负相关(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论永久性结肠造口患者的伤残接受度有待提升,医护人员应针对现有的社会支持系统,探索有效的干预措施,帮助患者采取积极应对的方式,提高其生活质量。
文摘Dynamics of soil nematode communities amended with agrochemicals and bio control preparations were investigated in a soybean field. The results showed that the frequency of plant non parasitic nematodes were obviously higher in soil amended with bio control preparations (Doufeng 1) than with urea and herbicide, however, that of plant parasitic nematodes exhibited an inverse trend.
