目的:本研究以某大型三甲医院的心肺康复科为背景,选择了520例确诊的慢性心肺疾病患者,依据随机分组原则,分为干预组和对照组,各组260例。干预组接受为期12周心肺康复护理,而对照组则遵循标准护理程序。方法:通过对两组患者的肺功能测试...目的:本研究以某大型三甲医院的心肺康复科为背景,选择了520例确诊的慢性心肺疾病患者,依据随机分组原则,分为干预组和对照组,各组260例。干预组接受为期12周心肺康复护理,而对照组则遵循标准护理程序。方法:通过对两组患者的肺功能测试(如FEV1和FVC)、6分钟步行能力以及生活质量评价等多维度指标进行严格的数据采集与对比分析。结果:实验组在各项关键指标上均显示出显著的进步,护理干预并未引发明显的不良反应。结论:心肺康复护理作为一项创新的治疗手段,在慢性心肺疾病的管理中展现出了显著的疗效提升和生活质量改善优势。临床应用前景广阔,值得深入研究和推广。Objective: Based on the cardiorespiratory rehabilitation department of a large tertiary hospital, this study selected 520 confirmed patients with chronic heart and lung disease. According to the principle of random grouping, they were divided into an intervention group and a control group, with 260 cases in each group. The intervention group received 12 weeks of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation care, while the control group followed standard nursing procedures. Method: Strict data collection and comparative analysis were conducted on multidimensional indicators such as lung function testing (such as FEV1 and FVC), 6-minute walking ability, and quality of life evaluation between two groups of patients. Result: The experimental group showed significant progress in all key indicators, and nursing interventions did not cause significant adverse reactions. Conclusion: Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation nursing, as an innovative treatment method, has shown significant advantages in improving therapeutic efficacy and quality of life in the management of chronic heart and lung diseases. Its clinical application prospects are broad and worthy of in-depth research and promotion.展开更多
文摘目的:本研究以某大型三甲医院的心肺康复科为背景,选择了520例确诊的慢性心肺疾病患者,依据随机分组原则,分为干预组和对照组,各组260例。干预组接受为期12周心肺康复护理,而对照组则遵循标准护理程序。方法:通过对两组患者的肺功能测试(如FEV1和FVC)、6分钟步行能力以及生活质量评价等多维度指标进行严格的数据采集与对比分析。结果:实验组在各项关键指标上均显示出显著的进步,护理干预并未引发明显的不良反应。结论:心肺康复护理作为一项创新的治疗手段,在慢性心肺疾病的管理中展现出了显著的疗效提升和生活质量改善优势。临床应用前景广阔,值得深入研究和推广。Objective: Based on the cardiorespiratory rehabilitation department of a large tertiary hospital, this study selected 520 confirmed patients with chronic heart and lung disease. According to the principle of random grouping, they were divided into an intervention group and a control group, with 260 cases in each group. The intervention group received 12 weeks of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation care, while the control group followed standard nursing procedures. Method: Strict data collection and comparative analysis were conducted on multidimensional indicators such as lung function testing (such as FEV1 and FVC), 6-minute walking ability, and quality of life evaluation between two groups of patients. Result: The experimental group showed significant progress in all key indicators, and nursing interventions did not cause significant adverse reactions. Conclusion: Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation nursing, as an innovative treatment method, has shown significant advantages in improving therapeutic efficacy and quality of life in the management of chronic heart and lung diseases. Its clinical application prospects are broad and worthy of in-depth research and promotion.
